Full Games List
Featured Games
Reviews
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Engines
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engine Bulletins
Links
What is Makerscore?
Store
RMN Music Pack
Event History
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Post History
Status History
The Latest
RMN TV
#rpgmaker.net IRC
New to RMN?
RMN v4.5 (and beyond) Feature Idea List
EXECUTIVE DECISION 19.1.6 (C) III - BCB
Posts
Pages:
1
rcholbert
CloseNovember 8th, 2007
To our netizens,
This decision/signing statement may also be known as BCB - Bad Content Ban. It is an addition to kentona's game and review submission rules, found at http://www.rpgmaker.net/forums/index.php?topic=322.0
The aforementioned game policy, while much more effective than our previous policy (if only because we didn't have one), had one glaring fault: as long as you met the basic criteria, we would approve your content, no exceptions.Ladies and gentlemen, that day is over.
Effective immediately, we will only approve content that we deem worthy. We reserve the right to reject your submitted content on the basis that it sucks. Only content that is believed to be of a certain level of quality will be approved by our moderation team, else they face the wrath of my future ex-wife.
What does this mean for the average user? Well, nothing really. This is not meant to be a form of censorship and we're not going to actively looking for reasons to deny your content. The vast majority of our users here generate decent enough discussion and submit good enough work. However, it does mean we will refuse to be a breeding ground for spastic noob submissions. Chances are if you're new to the rpgmaker scene, your first few submissions will be denied until you catch up to speed.
However, there won't be any "lol no" comments. We'll specify what is wrong and give you the opportunity to correct it.
Sincerely,
Robert Holbert I, The Conquerer
First and Much Beloved Emperor,
RPG Maker Network
To our netizens,
This decision/signing statement may also be known as BCB - Bad Content Ban. It is an addition to kentona's game and review submission rules, found at http://www.rpgmaker.net/forums/index.php?topic=322.0
The aforementioned game policy, while much more effective than our previous policy (if only because we didn't have one), had one glaring fault: as long as you met the basic criteria, we would approve your content, no exceptions.
Effective immediately, we will only approve content that we deem worthy. We reserve the right to reject your submitted content on the basis that it sucks. Only content that is believed to be of a certain level of quality will be approved by our moderation team, else they face the wrath of my future ex-wife.
What does this mean for the average user? Well, nothing really. This is not meant to be a form of censorship and we're not going to actively looking for reasons to deny your content. The vast majority of our users here generate decent enough discussion and submit good enough work. However, it does mean we will refuse to be a breeding ground for spastic noob submissions. Chances are if you're new to the rpgmaker scene, your first few submissions will be denied until you catch up to speed.
However, there won't be any "lol no" comments. We'll specify what is wrong and give you the opportunity to correct it.
Sincerely,
Robert Holbert I, The Conquerer
First and Much Beloved Emperor,
RPG Maker Network
brandonabley
1504
author=kentona link=topic=377.msg7655#msg7655 date=1200585135
With the arrival of Liberty, I suppose we can now remove the strikethrough on 'Ladies'.
What about me? I've been here the whole time.
holb, you denied my well-written lesbian pirate love story article and gave me the first RMN warn before this rule was put into place! There was no sex, it wasn't badly written and one of the article categories specifically states that it can have pirate writings. :< :< :<
I feel so abused. OPRESSION!
I feel so abused. OPRESSION!
myersguy
292
Lol, Holbocracy, awesome. I also believe that RMN was somewhat in need of this policy, and the lack of it was what allowed people like shadow corporation (not to singl them ojut too much, but really, come on) to post so many low quality, half finished games. Again though, it wasn't only Shadow Corporation that was doing such things, there were others too.
demondestiny
979
author=Craze link=topic=377.msg8550#msg8550 date=1202157700
holb, you denied my well-written lesbian pirate love story article and gave me the first RMN warn before this rule was put into place! There was no sex, it wasn't badly written and one of the article categories specifically states that it can have pirate writings. :< :< :<
I feel so abused. OPRESSION!
Holb. How could you. This was a clearly well written article.
Lol, Holbocracy, awesome. I also believe that RMN was somewhat in need of this policy, and the lack of it was what allowed people like shadow corporation (not to singl them ojut too much, but really, come on) to post so many low quality, half finished games. Again though, it wasn't only Shadow Corporation that was doing such things, there were others too.
I believe he only finished like 1 game. I haven't found any others yet thet are similar to shadowcorporation.
I would just like to say, in follow-up, that the articles page clearly stated that "stories about pirates" were totally A-okay.
Damn you and your Holbocracy, holberticus!
Damn you and your Holbocracy, holberticus!
I understand about "pruning stuff that 'sucks'", though please don't prune any topics about projects that use old graphics but have things like Original Music and a well thought-out story.
Pages:
1
