2 reviews
  • Add Review
  • Subscribe
  • Nominate
  • Submit Media
  • RSS

Plox rewrite... for death or glory!



So, whilst being stuck at home with a contagious stomach bug, I had time, for once, to think through the overall plot and narrative of LoTL and how it was going to move forward, out of its demo stage, and into a full release.

Pacing:

Yes, LoTL does the exact opposite of Enelysion. The plot moves at such a blistering pace that many important details were left out, and I've toned down some aspects of the plot and leave it for later in the game. The first hour or so of the game should try to focus on TriAnna's growing bond with each other, since it sets the tone for several more scenes much later down the line.

Plot:

I've also changed the structure of the plot, since I understand that in its current incarnation, it is a bit difficult ( not to mention there are too many loopholes to correct ) to follow, since I threw in too many details, and when all of it is thrown together into a one-hour long demo, it can leave the player confused and scratching their heads.

So, first thing I did was reduce the age of the main cast and stripped down some of Tristy's military achievements and rather having her serve under her mentor, Bedivere. Her rank is also a Paladin now, rather than a Master Knight ( which is a promoted Paladin ).

The second thing I did was a subversion of the evil empire wants to rule the world cliche. Rather than Genoa ruling most of Eridanus for five-odd centuries or so, I rather centered the conflict on one duchy fighting for their own freedom versus another who supports the monarchy. Naturally, their conflict of interests would give way to civil unrest, and eventually, an all-out war.

And in the middle of this conflict, you have Tristian and Ianna.


Making them younger also enhances Ianna's innocence and prompts Tristian to grow more as a character.

As for Dante, I'd imagine Connaught would remain a neutral ally but they won't get ambushed by Avegin's men in the rewrite ( this is a perfect example of me becoming too engrossed with the actual dialogue of the game, rather than its over-arching plot >< ) and he is no longer a playable character. Maybe as a guest, but I don't see any reason for him to join forces with Tristian and co. without endangering his entire country. I want to give every playable unit in the game a concrete reason for joining, after all. He may have been important in the older versions of the game ( what with Disma and the Ebony Hand ) but now that that has been written out completely, I don't see any reason for muscle-mage to join Tristy. Rather we get Percival, Edmund, Bedivere, and later on, Darcy and Trabant.

As for the Dukes, Avegin is more extreme, seeing as he wants to tear down the monarchy altogether. Which means he still wants Ianna dead, regardless of circumstances and makes him one of Ianna's primary antagonists and makes Duke Edmund one of her strongest supporters.

Sir Edmund Bolingbroke of Caliburn. A Dragoon at your service. ^^

I hope this slight rewrite will make it a bit easier for you guys to understand now. In the meantime, I'm writing out the biographies for the playable characters so far.

Oh, and if you guys have any suggestions to improve the gameplay, let me hear it. =)

Posts

Pages: 1
nhubi
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
11099
How much younger are you going to make them? I mean one of the comments from the latest review is about Tristy's military career at such a young age and I understand you are removing some of those, but if the reason for making them younger is for Ianna to be seen as more innocent, that's an easy change without changing her age. She's simply been sheltered as Princess and heir from all the harsher realities, so her naivete and innocence isn't tied to nature, it's nurture.

Honestly even making Tristy a Paladin under a mentor doesn't really make that much of an impact if you are then going to reduce her age, it'll be the same issue, just at a less lofty position.

I'm going to miss Dante, but if he has no reason to be there, then he has to go.

Oh and it's Princess's - possessive, not collective.
unity
You're magical to me.
12540
I kind of liked their ages as they were, honestly. If you think it'll be better for the story, then I trust you, but I thought their situation already worked well with how it was before.
Red_Nova
Sir Redd of Novus: He who made Prayer of the Faithless that one time, and that was pretty dang rad! :D
9192
I don't have any strong feelings one way or another about the change of age. Like nhubi said, it's more about nurture vs. nature. A 16 year old thief who's been homeless for 5 years is more capable than a 30 year old man who's never held a weapon his entire life. If you think this age change will make a difference, then I'm cool with it.

I like the decision of lowering Tristian's rank, though. As a player, I like the idea of taking part in her development instead of stepping into the shoes of an already badass warrior. That's why I prefer to write younger MCs.

Interesting choice to remove Dante as a playable character, though I can understand the reasoning. I'm personally interested in seeing at least a glimpse of the supporting cast now. Looking forward to more!
author=nhubi
Oh and it's Princess's - possessive, not collective.


I've learnt that you can't have three conscecutive S in English, so it'd have to be Princess' and not Princess's but you do seem to know quite a bit more about English than me so now I'm slightly confused. xD

As for the rewrite, I've yet to play any of your games (sadly, I was gonna start with the mog one but it crashed) but I'm still planning to. Can't give much input on that though...
nhubi
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
11099
Yes Jo you can when it's a possessive. Let me put it this way, do you think the BBC would get it wrong, especially when they are talking about the newest edition to the Royal Family?

This is the way it works I was taught.

Princess - singular
Princess's - singular possessive
Princesses - plural
Princesses' - plural possessive
But Princess' is still an option, right? >.<
Because that's the way I was taught hahaha but being taught in brazil and being taught in australia are 2 completely different things...
nhubi
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
11099
Actually I was taught in the UK, it's where I was born and grew up. No, Princess' isn't right, a plural noun like Princesses, gets the possessive apostrophe without the additional 's' a singular noun like Princess doesn't. Think about how you pronounce it, you say all three 's's.

Words that end in S (whether single or double) tend to confuse simply because English language minds are taught to see that as a plural, the thing children are taught, if you want to make it plural just add an 's'. Dogs, Cats etc, they get into trouble when they hit sheep.

There is a 'rule' in standard English that there can't be three letters of any group in a row, not just s, and if they happen we add a hyphen like cross-section rather than crosssection and frill-less rather than frillless. But as always in English there are exceptions to the rule. Though in this case it actually isn't three of the same letter in a row, it's two of the letter, a punctuation mark and then another letter. It's the same as the hyphen.

Then again in Brazil are you taught English or American English?

Wow, I've really derailed this topic, sorry
Well, whatever little I was actually "taught" was from what I read in the highly inconsistent books I had to use during my experience as a teacher, for before so my real English teacher was Final Fantasy, so... ummm... >_> I don't even know.
I mean, the first book I taught was called American English, and ironically the school sold the course as a British English course, but the supplemental materials were very inconsistent and yeah there's no answer to that question hahah

I literally didn't even have training, they just took me to teach on my first week with no training and not even a coordinator or anything >_> >___>
nhubi
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
11099
Jo, you just qualified via the Cambridge English test, you're more than fine. Especially if FF was your teacher! Trust me, this stuff stumps native English speakers. Even I have to occasionally step myself through the singular->plural->possessive dance, and I was taught it officially.

Right, back to Tristy. I think I'm going to like Sir Edmund, I've always been rather fond of the Bolingbroke's.
As for the new character ages, Tristian is now 22, Ianna is 17, going on 18 ( it is tied more to the whole 'coming of age to rule' rather than Ianna's actual naievete; 23 was just a tad too old to take reign for me, though there have obviously been lots of real-life exceptions, but this is Tristy so-- ), and Perc is probably around 21 or so, making them some of my youngest characters ever.

The whole age reduction also allows me to play with a little more character development. By taking Tristian out of the whole 'experienced bad-ass knight and a veteran of at least one war scenario', she would be thrust into her first ever major war at such a young age, forcing her to re-analyse some things ( such as her chivalric take on the knight's moral code, her excessive pride and the 'romanticised' view on war ). But more of this will become known when I put up her biography, along with everyone else's. =)

Pages: 1