Description

The submission period for the contest is now over, but the discussion has just begun!

Forum thread here.

The results are in:

Gold - Azalathemad
Silver - Aegix_Drakan
Bronze - NeverSilent

Congratulations to them and to everyone who took part in the contest!





This is a Community episode a contest and an experiment in game design prompted by Sviel's suggestion among the many thought-provoking comments to that article. If you don't take part in the contest for fun, fame and prizes, do it for SCIENCE.

The individual goal of the contest is to design a RPG battle system and showcase it in one or a few battles, while avoiding the usual clutter of mechanisms that is a staple of the genre, with the help of some guidelines given below.

The collective goal is to search together for the essential principles of the RPG battle - the skeleton of decisions that gives them their flavor and depth.

This is more challenging than a normal contest because it rewards creative and analytical thinking rather than just good craftsmanship. On the other hand, I believe the results could greatly improve the future games produced by the community - both in terms of unexplored strategic potential, and of streamlining battle design to make game-wide balancing (which is one of the worst problems in RPGs) considerably easier.



The three elements listed below are the fundamental aspects of RPG battling. (Explanatory figures and details hidden in spoiler tags.)

They are often obscured by overly complex systems and tons of genre conventions. The purpose of this contest to see what happens when you lay them bare. I am convinced that tons of strategic possibilities have been overlooked so far, simply because they were hard to perceive under the layers of fluff.


1) All RPG systems have a common ground: damage per turn, with the goal of killing before you are killed.

Of course, in this mock-up battle with only Attacks, 1) the hero dies first, and 2) the player is bored to tears. So we must add skills and stuff. (Randomness creates variation that you have no control over, so I won't mention it here).


2) All skills/spells/buffs/items are ways of dealing or receiving that damage faster or slower, more continuously or in bursts. They control the way that damage is concentrated or diluted over time, like pushing and pulling on a rubber band. (The basic, fully stretched state is "spamming attack" as above: not exciting but it gets you there eventually).



Problems:
- the picture above suggests that countless possibilities have never been used (there are many other ways to position and combine these arrows). The most frequent improvement is agility buffs or gaining/losing turns, i.e. ways to do more complicated actions by employing multiple skills at once. But there are lots of other ways to expand on it (see Tips & Inspirations below for ideas).

- usually, healing simply erases some of the enemy's actions in an irrecoverable way. You attack n times, I heal, you attack again, I heal => no net effect, boring. Hence the huge asymmetry in RPG battles: heroes can always heal, most enemies cannot, because there's nothing more infuriating than seeing the enemy heal and erase all your efforts.
It would be more interesting to rethink healing so that the effect of an action was never canceled, but for instance delayed, or spread over X turns, or converted into something else - still there in some form, ready to be reused by future skills.



3) MP, Limit Breaks, status conditions, multiple characters and classes are ways of allowing the player variable access to the skills over time. That's because strategy is not about the winning move, it's about progressively setting up the conditions which allow that move.



Problem: in RPGs you generally have extremely basic (un)locking conditions within the battle:
- "if I have a lot of MP, I can use all my powerful spells"
- "if this character dies/sleeps/is berserk, I lose access to their skills"
- (occasionally) "if I use a weak skill I will be able to use a stronger one next"

I think this is the aspect of RPGs that leaves the largest room for improvement by far. For a battle to have more strategy, every action you take should allow new moves and block other ones, potentially for the rest of the fight. What you can do at any given moment should be the logical product of your past actions and your enemy's, if possible in more evolved ways that a binary question like "out of mana?" or "silenced?".




This all boils down to a simple idea: if you want to encapsulate the feeling of combat, what you need is
- balance of power, represented by any gauge or number (and its evolution in time),
- seizing opportunities, represented by the diversity of available options and how you get or lose access to them.
Everything else is decorative, and there is much more freedom in how you could translate this into a system than what has ever been explored in any game so far.




- Rules with "must" are requirements.

- Rules with "should" can be transgressed at your own risk, if you think your interpretation is more clever than the original rule (feel free to contact me to talk about it).


1) Game:

- The game can be made using any software, but it must contain everything it requires to run on its own.

- You can reuse the Default Battle System in clever ways, use scripts, or make a custom system of any degree of sophistication. You won't be judged on the prettiness of the implementation, only on the strategic depth of the principles beneath.

- The entry can be a single or multiple battles long (but we will judge at most 4 or 5 battles, not 40). It should not contain any cutscene or exploration phase, unless they are entirely skippable.
=> You can make an entire game out of your system, just give the judges a way to play only the 1 to 5 battles you want to showcase.

- There can be as many or as few characters & enemies as you wish. The rules suggested here should make a 1-character 1-enemy duel as complex as a full-scale battle.

2) Skill design:

- The only gauge must be HP. You can work around this rule and make MP/AP/Limit Break equivalents using the rules below, but tons of extra points will be given to contestants who instead try to do something really new.

- There must be no randomness in the effect of an attack or skill. This contest is just an experiment in RPG tactics, so the player should be able to make elaborate plans without computing conditional probabilities in their head.

- Skills should be designed to reflect principle 2) in the Rationale section above as clearly as possible
i.e. skills are ways to change the repartition of damage over time. The effect of any skill in those terms should be very clear, to let players compare skills and conceive strategies more easily. For instance, instead of directly dealing damage, skills could change the number of times a character attacks in a turn (it's easier to compare "1 attack" with "3 attacks" than to have to chose between spells that inflict 70HP on one enemy or 10HP/turn for 4 turns on 2 enemies).


- For more points, every skill should bring something new to the table. No skill should be "the same but stronger". Each skill should provide a different way of manipulating the repartition of damage over time, that cannot be produced by using other skills.

3) Skill unlocking:

- There must be rules to determine when you can or cannot use a given skill. We are trying here not to default to a simple gauge like MP: expending mana/drinking ethers is a very binary way of implementing actions that (un)lock other actions. Ideally, every action could have:
* multiple effects in unlocking other actions (e.g. a feint opens up various attacks)
* multiple conditions for its own unlocking (e.g. an attack requires the right posture, the right distance, and the right weakness in the enemy's defense)
* multiple ways to fulfill these conditions

- As much as possible, the rules for locking/unlocking should not be special cases (e.g. Fire Sword unlocks Mega-Smash), but more general logical principles. Even better if they apply similarly to the enemies' skills!

- As much as possible, locking/unlocking should be long lasting, i.e. not only dependent on the current state of the characters, but also on past actions both by them and by their enemies.

Counter-example to these 3 points: Being "out of mana" is a locking effect that
- depends only on your current state (no matter how you reached it or what the enemy has been doing)
- affects all skills at the same time
- has no real trade-off: more mana always equals more good
- and can be canceled with a single action (drinking an Ether).
By contrast, in a typical strategy game, every time you move a piece, you are closing off some possibilities and opening new ones by combination with the positions of all other pieces, so every move along the way can play some role in your victory.


- You are free to invent the detail of these locking rules, but more points will be given if they are simple and intuitive.
Example: in board games, it's simple geometry that creates these rules (a piece/unit contributes to your tactics by blocking a line of sight, or flanking an enemy...). Here you could use some sort of spatial logic as well, or all sorts of different principles (see Tips & Inspirations below for examples).


- If you have multiple battles, there can be permanent effects transferred from one battle to the next.
i.e. "items" are skills following all the rules above, except their locking/unlocking effects are not limited to one battle (e.g. a consumable item simply locks itself permanently once used, but there could be more elaborate patterns).




General tips and suggestions:

- Anyone who has trouble with the rules can ask questions in a comment or PM. I can help with things such as checking that skills are not reducible to one another, if you want to do it the mathy way.

- "one goal=one action" is the antithesis of strategy. Every action should serve multiple goals and every goal require multiple actions. Real creativity appears when you start finding ways to control the breadth of actions at your and your enemy's disposal, trapping them into predictable moves while extending your own possibilities.

- you can draw some inspiration from CCGs like Magic the Gathering. They are in fact very close to the concepts exposed here for RPG battles: the "skill unlocking" revolves partly around drawing the cards from your deck, with special effects such as reshuffling the deck or drawing more often. Notice that most CCGs contain effects that allow to bring back cards that have already been used/discarded, which is a way of making even past actions relevant to your current tactical options.

- It could be great to have a visual aid for damage repartition/displacement over turns (perhaps a graph of damage over time, in the spirit of what I did in the Rationale section) or some other way to make the effect of any skill perfectly clear and analyzable by the player.

- A suggestion: skills could displace either the same quantity of damage (e.g. 1HP if you're going the small-numbers route), or all the damage dealt in the target turn(s) (including contributions from other skills). This will make elaborate tactics much easier to figure than having a lot of different quantities or percentages. The less math the player needs to do, the more they can make clever plans.

- How much damage is moved around by a skill should not depend on some intrinsic property of the character or the enemy (e.g. elemental weakness). We want strategies to be effective because of what the enemies have done, not because of what they are (i.e. strategy rather than a puzzle that can be solved once and for all). What will differentiate them is their inventory of skills and how they use them.

- You are allowed to "disguise" to some extent the mechanical aspects detailed above to make the game more appealing or closer in appearance to traditional RPGs, as long as damage-moving and locking rules are clearly stated in-game or in a design document included with the game.

Don't go too fancy though: the goal is to expose the skeleton of RPG battles, not bury it under fluff.


Some random starting ideas:

* Why not boil it down to a single HP bar and have each group try to push it in a different direction? (somewhat like Last Word)

* What if a single attack could kill, and the whole battle is a game of counters and feints to try to get that attack in before the enemy does? (Bushido Blade style)

* What if the "rubber band" of damage is elastic, and tends to come back to its natural state over time (so that both bursts of damage and healing progressively come undone)

* Why not use many more status conditions than usual, each one affecting some fraction of the skills (like Silence prevents Magic, but less generic), or even interacting with each other.

* For instance, why not call status conditions "stances" and use concepts from martial arts or fencing to create the skill unlocking logic? (depending on your distance, your weapon, your stance and the enemy's, you can use ground fighting, feints, throws, locks and so on)

* What if there were more categories than just allies and enemies with which to interact through the skills? (for instance neutral resources in the environment)

* For a simple extension of the DBS, you could have a number of different characters with a system for switching them in battle, then group skills that should be locked or unlocked together by giving them to the same character (or make them combos requiring multiple characters), then add conditions to access/summon that character.

* A limited component of TRPG-like motion is not forbidden (think The Reconstruction), although I'd like to see contestants tread newer ground as well.

* For multiple battles, how about having enemies who have the same brute force as you, but are programmed to have an increasingly broad range of tactical possibilities? Every encounter would actually serve the overall gameplay by teaching you how to deal with them in more and more elaborate settings, instead of being its own beast that loses all purpose once mastered.



Recommendations given in the comments section:
An episode of Retronauts literally just came out that discusses RPG battle systems.

http://www.retronauts.com/?p=846.





Anyone who wants to help me judge can let me know here or by PM, I will require their help depending on how many submissions we get. I will ask the judges to read this conversation if they haven't already, so as to have an idea of what we are looking for here.

Tentative criteria for judging:


Originality (20pts): How much does the system contribute to pushing the boundaries of the genre?

Example: Can you find ways to expand on the JRPG system that are not just adding one more gauge, or one more way to get a stat bonus?

Elegance (25pts): Is the system using as few ingredients as possible to achieve its goals in a precise way?

Example: Is each skill truly different from the others? Have you found a simpler way to achieve what usually requires 3 gauges, 10 stats and 100 different items?

Clarity (20pts): How well can the player understand the system, its strategic stakes, and the reason their actions succeed or fail?

Example: Are the effects of each action clearly labeled? Does the system avoid having the player do mental calculus to evaluate the result of their actions? Is the skill unlocking logic consistent and predictable?

Depth (25pts): How much does the system allow and reward elaborate plans, creativity and tactical intuition?

Example: Can we predict how our actions will guide the enemies' reactions, allowing us to manipulate them? Is the game more than pure HP/MP/Item attrition?

Bonus (10pts): Anything a judge finds especially worthy of praise.




I don't expect that making the game will take more than a couple of days at most; however for the sake of all people with a busy schedule, the contest will run from July 27 to August 27 23:59 EST. (however I won't mind if people get the time zone wrong)




The top 3 contestants will get to choose one of the following prizes:

(x1) Any game under 20 USD on Steam or the Humble store, because I might as well make it rain, FOR SCIENCE.

(x3) A (reasonable) drawing by yours truly. Preferably characters (fanart or original, any style), possibly simple environment shots or short multipanel gag in sketchy style. You can do whatever you want with it, use it as title screen or make a tattoo or sell it on eBay.

(x1) A cameo in my future game (hey, that works for Kickstarters. NB: I'm not really expecting anyone to pick this, but I'll give details if a winner is actually interested.)

Details

Achievements

Registration

You must be logged in to sign up for Fundamental RPGology.

Teams Members Entry
If Karin finds out, I'm screwed.
Bludgeon of Inspiration
I'm below those above me.
Why did the statement game ended?
All statements below and above this one just make this one look better. :D
Complexity =/= Strategy
Brotherhood of Evil Statements
If soulkeeper finds out, I'm confused.
Gourdy might not be lazy?
The below statement is false
This statement may have a disclaimer.
The above statement is true if this statement is false.
The above statement broke the chain.
Life is Turn-Based.
Simply complicated ;_;
Fighting to the death with Seiromem!
Oh yes, there will be blood...
If kentona or soulkeeper finds out, I'd be all "whatever."
Kentona still owes me a date.
I'll release my limit break on all of you!
You're fighting with borrowed power.
LET'S. DO. THIS???
Be Like Water My Friend
At least I'll get something out of this summer.
Ayane Fanclub
THESE ARE COMBATS THAT MATTER!
+10 to all enemy stats.
TungerManU
Can't hardly Science
Im not crazy... My mother had me tested!
PetzlaProductions

Posts

Fixed it....

...Now why is "focused" always getting priority, and why is he able to bait and press me repeatedly when those moves should be sealed?

.....screw it. I'll check it tomorrow. I'm to tired to even type properly right now.
.....WHY ARE SOME ATTACKS DOING 14 DAMAGE?! *clutches head*

Everything is supposed to do 1 or 2 damage, and some states increase damage taken by 1. Why am I getting double digits here?!

EDIT: ....Why. The hell. Is my Lunatic Protect script status that's supposed to decrease or increase damage by a set number (+1 or -1 usually), now increasing the damage by much much more? *grumble*
...Yeah. Somehow, telling the script to increase damage to the target by 1 increases damage by 13, and telling it to decrease damage by 1 decreases it by 2.

......What the hell is going on here? It was working fine earlier in the week... ;_;

.......And if I increase the +damage number, the damage increase is practically exponential. Whyyyyyy. ;_; I just want to add or subtract a single point of damage! And you were working before! Why do you do this to me, RPGmaker?

The script clearly says "increases or decreases damage by a set amount". Why is it no longer a set amount? *grumbles angrily*
Aegix, I wouldn't post so much so frequently. While it's good to give progress updates, careful not to give them so often, especially since this isn't your blog. It's also multiple posts in a row, with little time between them. Just a heads-up before you get in trouble ;).

I've been recently getting intense with my system as well though. Finally getting the overall set-up ready. I've got so much to work on outside of this contest, though. But after last night, it's safe to think I can definitely put an entry in!
author=outcry312
Aegix, I wouldn't post so much so frequently. While it's good to give progress updates, careful not to give them so often, especially since this isn't your blog. It's also multiple posts in a row, with little time between them. Just a heads-up before you get in trouble ;)

Haha yes Aegix while I enjoy knowing about people's progress, and I feel your pain when it comes to bugs, but if it's things on which we cannot really contribute a discussion, it's better not to fill pages of the common topic with it. It's already too bloated for its own good :P

You should make a gamepage for your project and post blogs there. Especially since you could then post script snippets and I'd try to have a look at it when I have the time, to try and tell you what's wrong.

outcry> glad you'll be able to make it ;)

Louis> Cool, I guess it's Essence Enforcer? It looks beautiful!

caparo and anyone with problems thinking about the AI: I really recommend taking a look at Design Patterns Revisited and perhaps especially

the page on State Machines

It's packed with far more information than you'll ever need, and you can skip the C code snippets altogether, but reading the main text up to Finite States Machine to the Rescue (included) can prove really helpful in thinking about how to make your AI, or even your game system.
Looks awesome. I really think this'll help make future games better. Love the team names by the way.
Well, I shouldn't make the AI too optimal. Some unpredictable imperfections should exist otherwise players would have no chance :P

Just need to balance the skills and it'll be complete!

**Edit: Done. And submitted.
I have a question. Now I plan on having both AI and Local Player VS. Player, but say I don't have time to do AI. Basically Player VS. Player would allow the player to control both teams. Would this be acceptable? Almost like playing chess against yourself, basically seeing which side would win if you played your best with both teams. Or you can have a second person play the other team anyway. That way I can still show off the system, just not have an AI. Would this be just as acceptable?

I'm going to try for an AI, but just in case it holds me back too far.
Hmm. It would be more pleasant to be able to test the system against an AI, but we're not judging your AI making abilities (except to the extent that AI rules can themselves be part of the mechanics), so... For me it would be acceptable, but I'd like to hear the other judges on that point.

caparo> Congrats on being the first to finish. Are you sure the submission went through? I can't seem to see it.
I'd probably not ignore it completely during the rating as it is part of the system (and as it originially was meant to have AI), and something others will have to have worked on longer. Nevertheless, I don't see a big problem with it in itself.

It's more important to finish the system than the AI. Still, good luck! Would be neat to finish that as well.

@caparo: congratz!
@Hasvers: I can see my uploaded files in the event locker (when I click on the manage button)

@Kylaila: Thanks!

The AI is fairly competent, but not optimal. At least that's my experience during testing (biased assessment of own product :P ).

**Edit: Is it not enough to submit it via the 'submit' button on the contest page?
Marrend
Guardian of the Description Thread
20131
I wouldn't worry too much, caparo. Your game/demo/system/whatever will appear when the event closes. Or, if you are absolutely dying for feedback, you can copy the link into a post. Like so.
I'm wondering, are all submitted items going to be open for public viewing? Because I'd like to look into the entries of the others too, when all this is done. I mean, who knows what I might learn from them?

Oh, and congrats Caparo!
Darn... I thought I was gonna be the first one XD
Thanks for the answers you three(especially you Merlandese ;D). I'm working on the design right now, specifically skillsets. After that I'll see if I can event the system(I certainly can), and I'll try for AI first, since player vs player is easier.
(Got all my issues fixed, seems like.)

I'm facing a design dilemma.

My system is based around the following principles:
1) Skills fall under two categories: Offense and Support, each with 8 skills.
2) When you use a skill, it becomes sealed.
3) When you use a skill, it unlocks one or two new skills.
4) Only two support and two offense skills unlock 2 new skills.

While this does lead to the player needing to use moves they might not ordinarily want to use in order to unlock some skills that they might find more useful...It sometimes feels like the unlocking comes too slowly, or that going for the more powerful moves takes too much effort.

I might need to completely rejigger my whole unlocking sequence... >_>

Man... caparo already submitted his entry.

I have to advance with my entry, or I'll never get finished in time!

P.S. : It's possible to download other contestants entries?
YAY!!! My entry is finished and submitted!!! It's in RM2k3

I managed to compress the stuff into 3 battles. Each battle attacks one of the rationales of the contest.

I also added a Boss Rush mode (someone here in this post said it, I thought it would be a good idea and included it also. I don't remember who was but thank you very much) and I expect the game to be available in its own page soon.

Some people made interesting, funny and creative contributions in some of my topics, so I included them also. Thank you very much guys and looking forward this constest. More updates later!
author=Treason89
YAY!!! My entry is finished and submitted!!! It's in RM2k3

I managed to compress the stuff into 3 battles. Each battle attacks one of the rationales of the contest.

I also added a Boss Rush mode (someone here in this post said it, I thought it would be a good idea and included it also. I don't remember who was but thank you very much) and I expect the game to be available in its own page soon.

Some people made interesting, funny and creative contributions in some of my topics, so I included them also. Thank you very much guys and looking forward this constest. More updates later!


You have got to be kidding me!
Hey, there's still two and a half weeks till the deadline! The time it takes you to get this done really depends on the system you're making. Some systems only need a few days of work to set-up.

Mine on the other hand is going to take a while.