• Add Review
  • Subscribe
  • Nominate
  • Submit Media
  • RSS
THE CONTEST ENTRY VERSION COMPLETED BEFORE THE DEADLINE IS VERSION 1.4! Any version after that is not for the contest. I'm keeping the contest version up for you to see what it was like then(I was unhappy with how I didn't revise the writing when I changed the number of levels)!

The contest entry aims for an hour length. Future, more enhanced versions will have more levels. But for the contest, this first version will feature ONE memory the player must complete. It'll have four stages for visiting, as you try to find the conspiracy and solve this patient's problem.

COMPLETE: Current Version: 1.5
(Check download page for a version without RTP)

Perspective stars Amelia, the player, who discovers her attribute: memory. Guided by a therapist, she'll figure out how to use this ability in helpful ways for the patients. Evelyn Catarina, the lead therapist in the office, and her assistant Mr Pharell hope for an even greater benefit: finding information on a multi-country conspiracy!

The player will enter the patient's memory where they must follow clues. How do you obtain clues? By spectating the memory and watching where people go, hearing what they say. Based on your observations, you'll follow each lead to be in the right spot at the right time, and discover the mystery behind the memory! You can only be in one place at one time and when you discover something, you may have to just go back to an earlier part of the memory to follow the lead. Jump from stage to stage in the memory, each lasting a few minutes long.

The game experience will be very different for everyone! You can choose to find clues however you like. Follow this one person through the whole stage. Run around aimlessly to happen across something luckily. Choose a room and stay the entire stage. Do what you want to figure it out. Do the stages in any order! In the end, you'll need to have each piece of the mystery to prove the answer to it! (Although using your deduction skills is the preferred strategy)

Resource credits to:
Celiana for the tileset
Kread for an Event Update script
N.A.S.T.Y. Text Pop Over Events -Nelderson, tomoaky, and IceDragon
Gab Window - Yanfly
RMN Music Pack for the Soundtrack
MACK for use of the character generator

Other than my work, which includes level design, narrative design, writing, and all things gameplay, Seiromem mapped the level. And then thanks are due for my testers!
Veronica Bennie(Younger Sister)
John Bennie(Younger Brother, AKA: Seiromem)
Adam Rice
Andrew Clifford
Sone Berrios

Latest Blog

Act 2 resuming development, new system for clues, and Itch.io

First off, I've put the game up on itch.io! Perspective is ultimately going to be free of course, but I put it up there in case some might be generous enough to donate. It would help immensely and be very appreciated. Here's the link. I might plan some kind of reward for those who donate, maybe extras. Hmmmm...

Resuming Development
On to other news! I've gotten back to this project, and I'm getting back to working on the mapping of my four levels. I was going to wait until all four were mapped and show them as progress, but it's taking longer then I'd hoped. One is done, but I need to move on to the next ones. Other than mapping, I've got some character graphics to edit, but I also recently have a change coming with act 2 in terms of clues.

New Evented Conditions for Clues
I always knew using regions would be the way to go(since I'm just an eventer), but had not figured out how to use them in VXACE. I knew them in vx but for some reason didn't find them in ACE. But I looked back into it and found it to be a great way to make sure the player is standing near the clue in order for it to appear. I can also track to make sure they have seen hints to where to find a clue before they can find said clue. This will be an interesting tool to make sure players aren't randomly happening upon these clues, and I can force them to deduce where they should find the clues instead. However, I'll be careful with this, especially with what I just mentioned: making sure they have seen hints first. This would be confusing to a player who already knows about the clue and just wants to find it. So I can only add this condition in certain circumstances. Act 1's level won't be changed much, but these next act 2 levels will!

I still don't have a way to allow fast forwarding and rewinding. That's a little too intense for my skills. That would be a feature in a remake, when I can work with a programmer to set that up. But ah well. That's what's new with Perspective! Again, if you like my work and can donate a dollar in support, I'll be very thankful!


Pages: first 1234 next last
When you say "they", do you mean me? Hah, I have been working on a continuation of this game actually, continuing the story. That answers your "why haven't they made more games like this", but I'm interested to know what version you played? Sounds like you played the revised version of act 1. If you did, and your comments directed at the storytelling are true, then WOW! Thank you very much! I'm surprised to hear, in the midst of working on two projects and college work, that my revisions helped greatly. All of those things you said were definitely goals of mine with my revision. I added a lot of those conversations, fleshed it out. However, I'm limited in animations and skill with art and programming, so I totally agree with you on the disappointment occasionally in following certain characters, the fast forward and rewind mechanics. They would all wrap up the rest of this game into a whole, perfected design.

Without an artist or programmer, I am at a loss for these features, however. This is everything I can manage so far alone as a designer/writer, but I am making fixes. I'll jot down those issues you found, thank you! They will come in the next iteration. As for the frustration and understanding issues: I can see how it's very difficult to teach the player how the levels are structured. I'll hopefully be able to note all these misunderstandings and change the tutorial messages to make sure they include details like that.

Just a little progress mention: we are working on mapping for the four levels in act 2(it's taking a long time because Seiromem isn't actually working on them, and I might need to start.), but I plan on reducing the acts to 3 or 4 instead of 5. I agree, this concept has a lot of potential, which is why I planned 5 acts(5 total waves of content). But to improve the story and make sure it's complete faster, I'll be doing a rewrite of the later acts. Back to your thoughts on the story now that I think of it: It's great to know the first act's writing is up where I want it to be before moving on to the next act. I'm very happy you like the writing, as that's the part I was worried about after the contest version.

Oh, one more thing. About the characters of the level: I casted the new levels, making sure each had a role, and would ALL be necessary and fulfilling to watch. They'll have their own sub-plots, some side-quest mysteries, and you'll be able to really see how the world in Perspective(and my whole attribute universe) works.

To conclude, thank you! That was a good block of feedback, I really needed that actually, to help push the game along. I'm working on an RPG right now primarily, but hopefully this game speeds up in development.
Self-proclaimed Puzzle Snob
I just finished this game and I gotta say it was great. The game is a journey into a person's mind. Following people, just listening to their conversations, is addicting. I found the mechanic to be innovative and I'd like to see it in other games as well, for example a city where you can follow anyone and find out about their day, to solve a mystery. There's a ton of potential in this concept, which makes me think, "Why haven't they made more games like this before?" Even listening to a guy and a girl talk about books they're reading was cool. Seeing how all the pieces of the mystery fit together is great, and each character was important and unique so you get to know them each one by one, even if you don't know their names but just their roles and personality.

My strategy was to find out where each character started off in the day, and then follow them and see what they did. One thing I found sad is that I wasn't sure which order the events happened until later, because they seemed to be in a jumbled order on the map. This was due to the non-linear placement of the nodes in the mansion. I figured out which order they were in the end, but I think I found the events in the wrong order.

But that aside, there's tons of scenes of simultaneous content, and the way you make it all fit together in realtime is exceptional. It's all very rewarding. If I have a minor complaint, it's only that some characters would do nothing at all, and when I'd follow them, it'd be a disappointment to learn they were not important in that scene. But thinking about the alternatives, there probably aren't many. One would be to display the thoughts of the characters in brackets, but then again, I don't think that's effective storytelling - showing what people think rather than showing their motivations through what they say instead.

The ability to fastforward or rewind would be a cool addition to the game. For example, having a key bound to moving the clock backwards 15 seconds or something. There are a couple of quirks, like when you press pause, the "lounge music" plays but the background music still goes on, which makes them overlap each other. Also, sometimes when you use "D" to return from a night scene, it will remove the "night time overlay" and make it display with regular light instead. I think inside maps should be brightly lit at all times, but only when you go outside it should be dark.

The game outstayed its welcome during the latter portion, especially when you've got pretty much everything figured out and you're just wandering around trying to find the last bit you missed. I made the mistake of thinking that there was only "one" object to be found in each memory, then it would unlock the next memory, but I had an erroneous understanding of the game's mechanics.

I also got frustrated when I realized all I had to do to finish the game was to interact with those two crystals. I thought it might automatically be able to detect that I found all the clues without having to interact with the crystals, which I never did, because I just assumed you had to keep that information in your mind.

Nevertheless, overall the game is a well-told story with innovative mechanics and I enjoyed it. More games like this that push the envelope are appreciated. Looking forward to whatever other games you make. Cheers!
Ah, I see! In any case, good luck with the game, it looks great!
I do think you did a good job of conveying the information you wanted to tell, so no worries about that! One more thing: I gathered all the collectibles, which should've gotten me some sort of lore bonus, right? I couldn't find it! D:

Right. What you played is the beta, so it wouldn't have mattered to you at this time, but what's changed is if you go to the save crystal, any crystal, you "Check Achievements", and instead you get an achievement for getting the collectibles rather than lore.

I plan to have achievements reward you with... something starting act 2, but for now, they are just markers saying "Hey, you did it!"

As for lore bonuses, I plan on having some new way to give them to you, through journals or book entries or whatever things, and I need a place to keep those. For now though, there's no lore bonuses or achievement rewards yet.
I do think you did a good job of conveying the information you wanted to tell, so no worries about that! One more thing: I gathered all the collectibles, which should've gotten me some sort of lore bonus, right? I couldn't find it! D:
Hmmm, okay. I didn't know how the font would do for anybody else, so it's good to know it might be hard to read for some. I need to look into fonts more, and I had a lot of trouble with that when I was. My sister said she liked the font so I was like FINALLY, and put it in. Hah, my mistake.

I'm glad to hear from someone who played the extended version's demo before the contest entry. Act 1 is plenty different and more refined now compared to that one.

As for the lore about attributes, I'm sorry if you were a little more confused than you'd like, but there is something I intended. Act 1 is intended to be mainly the lore introduction as well as gameplay introduction. There were lore crystal unlockables before that talked about spirits and orbs, but random lore isn't a good reward and people usually don't want to read that. The intro also had too much exposition about the nature of attributes. So instead, I'm gonna let the game tell you through playing it.

If this world is to be believable, the attributes should mostly be common knowledge. So the best way for you to understand is to let the world tell you. Of course, it's not your fault because act 1 is short. Act 2 is larger, and will help build more understanding. I can't do much more with act 1 without overloading it with too much information. So! We'll let act 2 do it's work.

Now that you've played act 1 though, see it as this:
The gameplay mechanic uses Amelia's memory attribute, so there's an example of an attribute at play. The plot of the level is mainly about power that an attribute can give, at least that's what it will mean in the grand scheme of the storyline. So the majority is definitely introducing what attributes give to people. The conspiracy introduces the spirit and orb thing quickly, but obviously act 2 will focus on that stuff more.
Hey there! I just finished the demo. The extended version was the first time I've played. I really enjoyed the gameplay, trailing everyone and seeing all the pieces fall together.
I have to say, the font really isn't doing the game any favors, I'm sorry. It's a bit too tricky to read (Also a laptop user here) and it makes it kind of hard to keep track on everything that's going on, especially considering some of the cutscene stuff is kind of hard to take in without a proper lore introduction (attributes? Spirits? Orbs? Eh?). I got the hang of most of it in the end anyway, so there's that though! I'll be looking forward to the finished game in any case!
Oh, you put it in full screen? Oh my, I don't know what it looks like in full screen with new font. The message system isn't new, it was used for when you pick up clues before. I used it in the tutorial this time around, and I'm glad to hear it works a lot better.

As for the skipping of text, that's understandable. You already know what happens, hah. But the dialogue is very different in the intro this time around, did you notice the new scene changes? Not just dialogue, but there's more movement in the intro. That might be the differences you noticed. The exposition is removed from the tutorial, it's strictly the quick tutorial now, nothing more.

It's tough to judge act 1 with already playing the level before and knowing where everything is, I understand. Glad you're noticing the significant changes, however. As for act 2, start a new game and skip to act 2. The default is you didn't save Emily yourself, but you can see the new act intro without a graphic problem with the version you first had. If you want, you can download the new version and transfer your save. See if that works, hit two birds with one stone!
I have to admit I can't 100% remember how the old version played out, but I'll try my best to compare.

Firstly I skipped some (well, more than some) text as I already played Act I and the font in full-screen is really difficult to read on my laptop. It might be easier if the screen is further away from me, but on a laptop the letters look a like a jumbled, curvy mess. If others like it that's cool though. :)

I did notice some differences in the intro? It's better than before. I didn't have any issue picking up the item in the snow this time. Also did you remove some exposition? I didn't feel overwhelmed by unnecessary info this time (but maybe that's because I already played it).

About the collectibles, I might be really stupid because I didn't see them appear in the achievements window? But I didn't really focus on those so I might've missed something.

I like that the stripper (:P) now moves around in the basement with the "annoyed" emoticon. That's cute. Better than her staring at the wall.

This time I knew which guest it was (it was so obvious for me this time, haha) so I got the good ending. I liked it!

Did you add a new message system? The one that shows up at the top-left sometimes and is also used when you find a collectible? I loved that, was a lot more stream-lined. Amelia's clues were still good, but I already knew where to go for everything so I can't really judge that bit.

I haven't played Act 2 yet because I stopped as soon as I realized there was a charset bug. I want to play it properly. :P
I'll look into the passability and that hint circle. The font is new, and I've gotten good comments about it. No problems reading it so far, but you can't understand it? Hmmmm, alright, I can keep looking for fonts if it's too hard to read. Either way, that's 3 like it, 1 don't so far.

(XD you called her a stripper)

the charset is missing? right in the very beginning of act 2, or?

Edit: Just solved the passability, and the stage 4 clues seem to be the old clue twinkle, rather than the circle. I don't know why they changed back, but I'm gonna change them again. Thanks for that!

Lastly, the transition from act 1 to 2 seems to have that character set problem. I see what's missing and I'm fixing it now! Amelia was 0 opacity if leaving act 1 to go to act 2, and if you jump in from the title this problem doesn't happen. I'm replacing the beta with this fixed version, before anyone else gets their hands on it. Thanks for that test! You found some bugs really quick for me :P.

(I'll fix that grammar mistake too, but that's not done in the quick 0.2 beta I just put out. Damn, I editted this message about 5 times :P)

Lastly, lastly, how was the new intro? Do you think those level additions will help the experience? Would you want to hear more Amelia input during the level? How was the transition story-wise? Finally, how was the intro to act 2?
In the Extended Version, I can walk on the table with the candle below Amelia before she's taken.

Also oh my God did you change fonts? I can barely read the message system text. x___x

*continues playing*

I can walk on boxes in the basement where the stripper is hiding.

The "hint" circle there shows up as a twinkle instead. Not sure if that's on purpose.

In Act II is Amelia's charset missing? I only see Evalyn (sp?). Also there's a case of then > should be thAn. :)
Thanks for playing the game! I'm hoping to get a fast-forward button scripted to solve the waiting problem. However having good writing helps things stay interesting. It's come to a consensus that the intro needed work. I focused on that a lot with the revamped version.

The extended edition is coming along pretty well, and I think the new intro is gonna be better this time around. I appreciate the constructive response, thanks!
Just finished the game - only took me an hour or so. To be honest, I ended up skipping the intro dialogue because there was too much of it >.>; (Sorry)

The gameplay was really fun, though. I loved how everyone had a set move route, dialogue, and so on even if they weren't related to the crime. It adds more immersion and piques one's interest that way. However, it's pretty time consuming to stalk everyone so the game really tests your patience, too. Therefore, the game isn't for everyone if you're the impatient kind.

Overall, I liked the game.
may want to cut down on that act 2 lol 4 patients?that's just asking to go on a permanent hiatus! : D
w/o having a team to help you anyway
if each one is remotely as detailed as the act 1 memory
id not expect it to be finished honestly :3

could start with like 1-2 then add additional patients with updates :3
just don't bite off more then you can chew!
your amazing at game making but people have limits :3

upon replaying the start while a part of me felt his explanation once you went back in to that snow area could of been shorter
a player can just skip it and figure it out on there own
so its not a big deal
id +1 keeping as it is.

Believe it or not, 4 patients in act 2 isn't as hard as it sounds. Everything is just time-consuming, but I'm getting faster and faster. My process for making a level is getting better. As long as I keep my cool and patience it'll get done, and heck, I kind of foresee getting a couple others to help. We'll see when I head back to college. But either way, this is definitely getting done. More levels! More mysteries! I've already got the main plans for the characters and mapping of each memory ready. I'm just working on improving act 1 right now.

As for the intro, it still definitely calls for some improvements to how the tutorial teaches you how to play and add some characterization too.
We do not condone harassing other members by PM.
By submitting media, a media tab will appear so whenever someone comes to this page, they can check it out right from here! Of course you don't have to.

And by the way, in response to your youtube comment, it won't just be 3 acts... but 5 acts... :D
I would have more makerscore If I did things.

Click the button, use the youtube thing, and you're golden.
We do not condone harassing other members by PM.
id love too my furry owl friend but between them being denied to taking days on end to be accepted im sketchy about it :3
I would have more makerscore If I did things.
Now submit it as a media item for makerscore more people to see!
We do not condone harassing other members by PM.
changed my mind,i wont consider it a speed run
it was in my initial thoughts simply because how much faster i beat it the second time around :3

3P in 37:18(if i just skipped the text would of been under 30 mins :3)
Pages: first 1234 next last