STATUS

Would you rather be famous for making horrid games, or unnoticed for making amazing games?

Posts

Pages: 1
Arandomgamemaker
1629
10/29/2013 01:50 AM
Yup, one of those questions. I would want to be unnoticed, because that way I wouldn't be EA or Activision.
TheNecromancer
3160
10/29/2013 03:34 AM
Which ever one gets me laid.

So neither.
FangStiltzskin
308
10/29/2013 03:39 AM
As long as I create freely whatever I want, I honestly wouldn't care.

However, I will say that I rather be making things that I want to be happy with, ergo the former situation will probably cause me torment in that regard.
Liberty
RTP Princess
24266
10/29/2013 12:00 PM
The last, because at least I could be proud of my creations, even if no-one else knows of them.
GreatRedSpirit
ski-ba-bop-ba-dop-bop
6514
10/29/2013 03:32 PM
Definitely #2. At least my friends and I could play my awesome games even if the Internet doesn't.
kentona
Bunnyhug
21027
10/29/2013 03:35 PM
I choose fame.
Addit
6394
10/29/2013 05:41 PM
I couldn’t handle any of the publicity, so I choose the second option.
Marrend
Guardian of the Description Thread
21781
10/30/2013 02:12 PM
author=Addit
I couldn’t handle any of the publicity, so I choose the second option.


Probably this for me.
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
10/30/2013 07:44 PM
I don't care about fame. I don't even care about players. The reason I make games is because games are worth making. They have an inherent value, like honesty or freedom or buffalo sauce, that's worth fighting for even if people hate you for it.

I would gladly go to war to protect game development!
Pages: 1