TUOMO_L'S PROFILE

author=Red_Nova
If it gets nominated, it'll be up for a public vote.

That said, I'm sorry to say your game can't be nominated. A) It needs a download submitted, and B) it doesn't look like commercial games can be nominated for Misaos in the first place, even with a public download.

I wish it were different, but that's how the site is set up.

B) it doesn't look like commercial games can be nominated for Misaos in the first place, even with a public download.

Why not? I did submit the game here and I made it in 2017. I did have a button link to download it too but Liberty wanted me to remove it.

Besides, in that case Save Your Mother would have qualified for Misaos anyway. (Since I technically released it again this year and it was a free game here long time ago in 2012 before I totally redid it from ground up and released it as commercial)

This whole thing's confusing.

author=kory_toombs
I'm still looking for some best RTP contenders here. Last year we only got one nomination.

I'm genuinely curious about what qualifies to be added to this category? Because it's not really clear if it means a best game made with only RTP or if it means best made use of a RTP resource, even if it's in something that has no other RTP at all?

author=JosephSeraph
you should avoid using the Cardcaptor Sakura magic circle, as it's CLAMP's intellectual property hah

That's not CardCaptor Sakura, it's by Yanfly. I'm fairly sure that's based off a real magical circle that's actually open source, I mean you can't exactly copyright old wiccan magical circles.

Like, I will change it if I must but does something like magical circle really even fall under IP's protection?? It's not exactly like Magic Circles are so easily distinguishable and recognizable like Batman symbols or such.

really, it's opening up the editor and formatting your image so it fits where you're putting it. saves stress, people's bandwidth and your game looks prettier and people can actually see and evaluate it. (regardless of whether it's this site's fault or not)

Yeah, but if I share it on RPG Maker Web, Facebook, IndieDB, My website, Steam or any other platform the autofit works properly. The problem is on RPG Maker net site only.

author=LockeZ
Oh yeah, I assumed there would be more characters in the real game. Obviously it looks idiotic with only 4 party members, but nobody would let you choose your party in a game with only 4 party members, that would be pointless. I'm giving you the benefit of the doubt on that one that it'll look fine in-game.

You're not actually choosing party, you're choosing who to play as. You only select one character and then each character gets their own storyline and own unique followers for each. The game changes based on the character you select hence they are rated by difficulty not by their names at bottom such as beginner, average, advanced and very advanced in that how hard their gimmicks are and how involved the process of learning their tricks and trades are.

That's kinda the problem of making assumptions that I am making players select whole party, because like you said Locke, it'd be really reduntant to select party of 4 from 4 choices. At the moment, there's 3 playable characters but this is the 4th character I'm currently working on, the vampire will be completely different from the rest of the girls.

It didn't fly over my head. Again, this issue is only on this website and it's also on game pages and such too. You have to right click image and press "view image" to see it as intended.



How does the characters select screen look with 4th character? I am still trying to find a good distance they should be from each other, so that they're not too close or too far.

author=Frogge
Probably because yours was too big and his helps people see the full thing more easily.

I'd say the map is quite bland. Also, it may just be a personal preference but I really hate 1 tile wide passages in my dungeons.

That's the resolution it's in my game. The forums in here don't autofit to larger resolutions properly.