New account registration is temporarily disabled.

ROBERT E. HOWARD

Posts

Pages: 1
The following post is a tradition for me to bring up.

Robert E. Howard, the man responsible for the Sword and Sorcery genre, is by far one of my favorite short story writers. For those who don't know of REH, he wrote Conan the Barbarian, Solomon Kane, King Kull, Bran Mak Morn, a bunch of westerns, boxing and detective fiction. If I recall, he wrote about 300 stories and most of them are entertaining as hell IMO.

Now maybe RMN can prove me wrong, but it's been my experience that most people (under the age of 35) who claim to like adventure/fantasy/fiction have no clue who Howard is. Yet, you mention one of Howard's contemporaries, Tolkien, and people are marching down-down to goblin town and the shire! I just find it kinda absurd that nearly all the people I've talked to who've seen the Conan movies (which are great Ahnuld flicks, but TERRIBLE Conan adaptations) didn't even know Conan existed as a series of short stories and novels! I'm not talking about they hadn't read them, they never even HEARD of them. I know it's pretty common for a book based movie to have its roots go unnoticed, but with a pop-culture figure like Conan, one would imagine knowledge of the original craftsman and his stories would also be common knowledge. Maybe I'm the exception, as I was hooked on them at an early age, drawn in at first by Sprague de Camp's reprints with the Frazetta (who kicks ass) cover art from my Dad's collection. As a result, I was pretty much launched into liking RPGs and Hack n' Slashes of the NES gen.

Anyway, as it's probably obvious by now, I'm a big fan of the Howard's work and felt like making a topic to discuss and spread word to other people. If you like action, adventure, enemies being cleaved asunder and sultry women being seduced, I'd highly recommend Conan. Solomon Kane for those who can do without the scantily clad women and would rather prefer a puritan era gun toting, rapier wielding vanquisher of evil.

Hell, I could go on mentioning the impact R.E.H. had on a shitload of the fantasy we all rock today, but I think I've ranted for long enough.

GO!
I just think Conan is a bit like Tarzan and... I don't know... Sherlock Holmes. So ingrained in popular culture that people just don't care where they originally came from.

And since it's all in that lovely pulp 30s era. (With all that other awesomeness like Lovecraft and John Carter of Mars and... Well Tarzan and Flash Gordon I guess)

I guess there's also a bit of the whole thing that Conan have evolved beyond Howard. Tolkien never did that. But Conan has had stories by other authors, comic books, movies the lot. While Tolkien have mostly been very... small. So that with Conan we associate Conan while with Lord of the Rings we associate Tolkien.

The creation outlasted the creator. Early Conan is public domain now isn't it? I've only ever read Conan in its really sucky translation by Äventyrsspel from some time in the 80s.
I know who Robert E. Howard is, and I know who Conan the Barbarian is, and I know he comes from a bunch of short stories and novels that Howard wrote, but unfortunately I haven't read any of them. Maybe I should, one of these days.

On the other hand, I have read some of Fafhrd and the Grey Mouser, by Fritz Lieber. That I did like, so I think I'd probably enjoy Conan, as well.
I have some respect for the original Conan universe because apparently it's actually a pretty interesting setting. However I really don't feel any motivation to read the novels ever.
It's cool to see people show interest and knowledge of REH.

Shinan: Yeah, you bring up some good points. It's as if popular literary and media icons had always existed. Also, in the UK and Australia I know REH's work has fallen into public domain, however elsewhere I'm unsure of and people fight over it's status constantly. I would recommend you try picking up a small paperback in it's original language if you wish since you can read and write in English very well. Hell sometimes I forget that you're from Finland, no harm meant by that! (I actually prefer Finlandia vodka over many Russian counterparts, I know sshhhh...don't let them hear that)

Orochi: Nice! Some recommendations of stories are: Red Nails, Rogues in the House and Tower of the Elephant. Maybe I'll try reading some of the Lieber books you mentioned as well.

Brandon: Yeah, the setting is pretty cool, it's devoid of any high fantasy creatures and wackiness lending it the name low-fantasy or sword and sorcery. Yet, it's filled with human guile, magic and strange beasts.
author=TMAC link=topic=1095.msg16203#msg16203 date=1210629982
Brandon: Yeah, the setting is pretty cool, it's devoid of any high fantasy creatures and wackiness lending it the name low-fantasy or sword and sorcery. Yet, it's filled with human guile, magic and strange beasts.


Well subtlety is very effective. If you have a world that isn't filled with monsters, the prospect of one monster is actually pretty terrifying! And let's be realistic seriously if dragons existed in any quantity greater than one they would rule the world.
Pages: 1