Full Games List
Featured Games
New Games
Reviews
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Images Feedback Summary
Game Design Highlights
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engines
Engine Bulletins
What is Makerscore?
Past Events
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Post History
Chat
New to RMN?
Full Store List
RMN Music Pack (free)
RMNVERSE BATTLEDOME SURVIVOR - GAME THREAD
Posts
ivoryjones
75
ivoryjones
View playlists
CloseSarah
We are actually, we are just waiting for Jeroen flip out town so we can say "in yo face!" to him day 2
We are actually, we are just waiting for Jeroen flip out town so we can say "in yo face!" to him day 2
Well if you know which one of the bunch isn't RUDE, do you mind telling me? Is it Kat?
Well if you know which one of the bunch isn't RUDE, do you mind telling me? Is it Kat?
Well this would be your best defense if we manage to actually kill Jaroen on day 1 and find out he's RUDE. I almost wrote scum, haha.
It's true that it wouldn't give us anything if he was innocent, but he went through enough effort to claim someone is innocent. Why would anyone do that in this game? Do you have an explanation for that?
I haven't been going around saying someone is innocent. I haven't been protecting anyone. In example instance if both me and Jeroen would be SCUM, killing me would leave you with even less iformation than it would leave you with killing Jeroen.
So, I don't see other reason why you'd be picking me, instead the fact I'm biggest threat to your grouping.
author=Liberty
Enna SykeI'm not against lynching Jaroen, I just feel that Happy is a better target due to his pointing out that he KNOWS who is supposedly RUDE. And I know that one of those he pointed out as knowing to be such is a full out lie.
Well if you know which one of the bunch isn't RUDE, do you mind telling me? Is it Kat?
That, and for all we know Jaroen and Happy could be a RUDE team determined to throw out false leads and sacrifice one in order to target the many. Or that Happy could be a RUDE using Jaroen's claims to his team's benefit if it clears certain other members of his team.
Well this would be your best defense if we manage to actually kill Jaroen on day 1 and find out he's RUDE. I almost wrote scum, haha.
Of course, that doesn't discount both being innocent and doing what they feel is best, but I don't think that we should eliminate Jaroen just for the sake of hoping he's RUDE. If he is RUDE he's sure to have thrown suspicion on at least a few of his comrades anyway, so as to look like they aren't a team. If he's an innocent he may be completely wrong in his guesses. It doesn't give us shit.
It's true that it wouldn't give us anything if he was innocent, but he went through enough effort to claim someone is innocent. Why would anyone do that in this game? Do you have an explanation for that?
I haven't been going around saying someone is innocent. I haven't been protecting anyone. In example instance if both me and Jeroen would be SCUM, killing me would leave you with even less iformation than it would leave you with killing Jeroen.
So, I don't see other reason why you'd be picking me, instead the fact I'm biggest threat to your grouping.
And good effort Liberty, but you've already lost. You can try to have the mob take me out on day 1 and have them find out I'm one of the gladiators, but you do realize who they will be targeting then?
Even if I survive on round two, you've lost. As who why I will elaborate when I have time. Now I need to go to work!
Even if I survive on round two, you've lost. As who why I will elaborate when I have time. Now I need to go to work!
Bella Raptor
Liberty is playing more like she usually does and it's comforting. She's putting her neck out there so much for Jeroen it would be suicide if she's mafia and she seems to desire a win.
Anyway, it seems like lynching Jeroen is good in many scenarios regardless.
Liberty is playing more like she usually does and it's comforting. She's putting her neck out there so much for Jeroen it would be suicide if she's mafia and she seems to desire a win.
Anyway, it seems like lynching Jeroen is good in many scenarios regardless.
Enna Syke
Oh hi there, Happy. Yes, the person I'm sure is innocent is myself. Now don't get me wrong, you guys can't be sure of that due to the nature of the game, but I know I'm innocent and that is what has set me off most because you claim to KNOW that the four you say are RUDE, but I know that is not true.
This is why I'm adamant about calling you out. You lied, pure and simple. You're the best bet for RUDE agent at the moment as far as I'm concerned, so I'm sticking to my guns on this.
As for what you say about having them target me day 2 if you're proven innocent via lynch day 1? Let them. If you're proven innocent by lynch today, then I'll gladly accept a lynch on day 2.
Why? Because I know I'm innocent and you are acting scum. You keep drawing people away from the fact that you said you know 4 people are scum. How do you know? You can't.
And no, lynching Jaroen doesn't work. I've already explained this. Even if he were scum he could be trying to distance himself from seeming scum and being linked to them by casting suspicion on them. Even if he's innocent, he has had a whole one day with no real evidence at all to come up with these guesses. We can't put weight into that. There's nothing to back up that what he says is right.
author=LibertyEnna Syke
#cancel
#Attack Happy
You say I was a sure thing as a RUDE agent, that you know for sure that I, wildwes, Jaroen_Sol and Kat are they. You are wrong and spreading lies. We cannot live with someone who is actually going out of their way to kill off at least one innocent (I am quite sure of myself, thank you very much).
Now I don't know if this is Happy just spreading lies because he is a RUDE member or for whatever reason he has, but the fact remains that that kind of behaviour won't help us root out the RUDE.
Thank you to those who helped me. I may not think of you all as innocents even after this, but you've definitely gained more trust than others.
Oh hi there, Happy. Yes, the person I'm sure is innocent is myself. Now don't get me wrong, you guys can't be sure of that due to the nature of the game, but I know I'm innocent and that is what has set me off most because you claim to KNOW that the four you say are RUDE, but I know that is not true.
This is why I'm adamant about calling you out. You lied, pure and simple. You're the best bet for RUDE agent at the moment as far as I'm concerned, so I'm sticking to my guns on this.
As for what you say about having them target me day 2 if you're proven innocent via lynch day 1? Let them. If you're proven innocent by lynch today, then I'll gladly accept a lynch on day 2.
Why? Because I know I'm innocent and you are acting scum. You keep drawing people away from the fact that you said you know 4 people are scum. How do you know? You can't.
And no, lynching Jaroen doesn't work. I've already explained this. Even if he were scum he could be trying to distance himself from seeming scum and being linked to them by casting suspicion on them. Even if he's innocent, he has had a whole one day with no real evidence at all to come up with these guesses. We can't put weight into that. There's nothing to back up that what he says is right.
Enna Syke
Quote from http://rpgmaker.net/forums/topics/13514/?post=473420#post473420
Enna Syke
#cancel
#Attack Happy
You say I was a sure thing as a RUDE agent, that you know for sure that I, wildwes, Jaroen_Sol and Kat are they. You are wrong and spreading lies. We cannot live with someone who is actually going out of their way to kill off at least one innocent (I am quite sure of myself, thank you very much).
Now I don't know if this is Happy just spreading lies because he is a RUDE member or for whatever reason he has, but the fact remains that that kind of behaviour won't help us root out the RUDE.
Thank you to those who helped me. I may not think of you all as innocents even after this, but you've definitely gained more trust than others.
Oh hi there, Happy. Yes, the person I'm sure is innocent is myself. Now don't get me wrong, you guys can't be sure of that due to the nature of the game, but I know I'm innocent and that is what has set me off most because you claim to KNOW that the four you say are RUDE, but I know that is not true.
This is why I'm adamant about calling you out. You lied, pure and simple. You're the best bet for RUDE agent at the moment as far as I'm concerned, so I'm sticking to my guns on this.
As for what you say about having them target me day 2 if you're proven innocent via lynch day 1? Let them. If you're proven innocent by lynch today, then I'll gladly accept a lynch on day 2.
Why? Because I know I'm innocent and you are acting scum. You keep drawing people away from the fact that you said you know 4 people are scum. How do you know? You can't.
And no, lynching Jaroen doesn't work. I've already explained this. Even if he were scum he could be trying to distance himself from seeming scum and being linked to them by casting suspicion on them. Even if he's innocent, he has had a whole one day with no real evidence at all to come up with these guesses. We can't put weight into that. There's nothing to back up that what he says is right.
Fucking Quote/Hide Tags. Ignore the previous post pls. >.<;
Quote from http://rpgmaker.net/forums/topics/13514/?post=473420#post473420
Enna Syke
#cancel
#Attack Happy
You say I was a sure thing as a RUDE agent, that you know for sure that I, wildwes, Jaroen_Sol and Kat are they. You are wrong and spreading lies. We cannot live with someone who is actually going out of their way to kill off at least one innocent (I am quite sure of myself, thank you very much).
Now I don't know if this is Happy just spreading lies because he is a RUDE member or for whatever reason he has, but the fact remains that that kind of behaviour won't help us root out the RUDE.
Thank you to those who helped me. I may not think of you all as innocents even after this, but you've definitely gained more trust than others.
Oh hi there, Happy. Yes, the person I'm sure is innocent is myself. Now don't get me wrong, you guys can't be sure of that due to the nature of the game, but I know I'm innocent and that is what has set me off most because you claim to KNOW that the four you say are RUDE, but I know that is not true.
This is why I'm adamant about calling you out. You lied, pure and simple. You're the best bet for RUDE agent at the moment as far as I'm concerned, so I'm sticking to my guns on this.
As for what you say about having them target me day 2 if you're proven innocent via lynch day 1? Let them. If you're proven innocent by lynch today, then I'll gladly accept a lynch on day 2.
Why? Because I know I'm innocent and you are acting scum. You keep drawing people away from the fact that you said you know 4 people are scum. How do you know? You can't.
And no, lynching Jaroen doesn't work. I've already explained this. Even if he were scum he could be trying to distance himself from seeming scum and being linked to them by casting suspicion on them. Even if he's innocent, he has had a whole one day with no real evidence at all to come up with these guesses. We can't put weight into that. There's nothing to back up that what he says is right.
Fucking Quote/Hide Tags. Ignore the previous post pls. >.<;
Enna Syke
Have you played Mafia before? Scum teams tend to pretend to be suspicious of each other during play at least once, especially at the start of a game. That way they have 'proof' that they're 'not teaming' with others from the very start. It's a pretty standard way of playing the game, dear. Anyone who's ever been Mafia/scum has done it before. I refuse to believe that you don't know this.
You're the biggest one who has a chance of actually being RUDE. That's why I'm picking you. I know you lied about knowing who the RUDE are. I know that for sure. You've not backtracked as far as I've read, so that means you still claim that I and the others are RUDE.
If this is so, why are you trying to talk me - someone you're sure is RUDE - into lynching someone who, according to you, is my ally? If you know Jaroen is RUDE, why are you entertaining the thought that he's innocent and that we'll get information from him? You don't make sense.
author=Happy
It's true that it wouldn't give us anything if he was innocent, but he went through enough effort to claim someone is innocent. Why would anyone do that in this game? Do you have an explanation for that?
I haven't been going around saying someone is innocent. I haven't been protecting anyone. In example instance if both me and Jeroen would be SCUM, killing me would leave you with even less iformation than it would leave you with killing Jeroen.
So, I don't see other reason why you'd be picking me, instead the fact I'm biggest threat to your grouping.
Have you played Mafia before? Scum teams tend to pretend to be suspicious of each other during play at least once, especially at the start of a game. That way they have 'proof' that they're 'not teaming' with others from the very start. It's a pretty standard way of playing the game, dear. Anyone who's ever been Mafia/scum has done it before. I refuse to believe that you don't know this.
You're the biggest one who has a chance of actually being RUDE. That's why I'm picking you. I know you lied about knowing who the RUDE are. I know that for sure. You've not backtracked as far as I've read, so that means you still claim that I and the others are RUDE.
If this is so, why are you trying to talk me - someone you're sure is RUDE - into lynching someone who, according to you, is my ally? If you know Jaroen is RUDE, why are you entertaining the thought that he's innocent and that we'll get information from him? You don't make sense.
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
Kickit
I wonder if Happy has a power that lets him see who's RUDE
or if he's just overconfident and full of attitude
I wonder if Happy has a power that lets him see who's RUDE
or if he's just overconfident and full of attitude
Enna Syke
With Cavedog and Dudes being GMs of this game, I doubt there's such a power, especially a day ability that allows you to check every person or even more than one person. That would be a super OP ability. It would have to have a super huge drawback to use it.
The only way someone would know who was and wasn't RUDE on the first day would be to actually be a RUDE agent.
With Cavedog and Dudes being GMs of this game, I doubt there's such a power, especially a day ability that allows you to check every person or even more than one person. That would be a super OP ability. It would have to have a super huge drawback to use it.
The only way someone would know who was and wasn't RUDE on the first day would be to actually be a RUDE agent.
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
author=Happy
It's true that it wouldn't give us anything if he was innocent, but he went through enough effort to claim someone is innocent. Why would anyone do that in this game? Do you have an explanation for that?
Maybe because I legitimally don't believe she is a RUDE agent? Maybe because she seems to be one of the few people here with their head on tight? Scumbags wouldn't say anyond's innocent on day 1, no, but I'm not a scumbag. Your tunnel vision is quite bad, maybe you should see a doctor about it. Either you're a townie who thinks, oh, I'm sorry, KNOWS he's the best player ever but simply isn't, or a scumbag. Liberty has me convinced it's the second one.
#Cancel
#Lynch Happy
I'm still getting town vibes from Gourd, and I'm glad he's starting to think Libby is town too, because I seriously can't be the only one who's sure of her innocence.
The Dawg
God DAMMIT, guys.
Okay, here's my, uh, input on the matter:
About Lisa (you know, the very Happy individual) KNOWING the four RUDE agents: I'm gonna take a wild guess and assume he's just, uh, making deductions, man.
And with regards to Ms. Enna Syke, there are a few posts I'd like to bring up:
Now, uh, correct me if I'm wrong, but this seems to me to be the kind of post that says, "Yeah, so this guy is a total scumbag but he may not be a RUDE agent so don't blame me if attacking him goes to shit!" Now, on the other hand, I've noticed Lisa hasn't made any sort of, uh, disclaimer, leading me to believe that he's just very passionate about having deduced (or, uh, "deduced") who the RUDE agents are, you know?
Yeah, see, now, uh, here's the thing: Why would our friend Lisa here pull this here stunt on, uh, Day 1? It's pretty damn risky and wouldn't, you know, really get him anywhere in the end.
Therefore, at this point in time, I'm, uh, more inclined to side with Lisa than Enna.
But, for what it's worth, I'm gonna have to agree that attacking Jeroen wouldn't solve anything. Opinions are just opinions, man.
God DAMMIT, guys.
Okay, here's my, uh, input on the matter:
About Lisa (you know, the very Happy individual) KNOWING the four RUDE agents: I'm gonna take a wild guess and assume he's just, uh, making deductions, man.
And with regards to Ms. Enna Syke, there are a few posts I'd like to bring up:
author=Liberty
Now I don't know if this is Happy just spreading lies because he is a RUDE member or for whatever reason he has, but the fact remains that that kind of behaviour won't help us root out the RUDE.
Now, uh, correct me if I'm wrong, but this seems to me to be the kind of post that says, "Yeah, so this guy is a total scumbag but he may not be a RUDE agent so don't blame me if attacking him goes to shit!" Now, on the other hand, I've noticed Lisa hasn't made any sort of, uh, disclaimer, leading me to believe that he's just very passionate about having deduced (or, uh, "deduced") who the RUDE agents are, you know?
author=Liberty
Meanwhile we have a certain someone who professed to know exactly who is scum. If you kill one of the people he mentioned off you will find that he is lying. I'm almost tempted to tell you to kill me just so you can all aim for him tomorrow because I tell you right now - I am not RUDE and he FLAT OUT LIED about knowing who the RUDE agents are.
Yeah, see, now, uh, here's the thing: Why would our friend Lisa here pull this here stunt on, uh, Day 1? It's pretty damn risky and wouldn't, you know, really get him anywhere in the end.
Therefore, at this point in time, I'm, uh, more inclined to side with Lisa than Enna.
But, for what it's worth, I'm gonna have to agree that attacking Jeroen wouldn't solve anything. Opinions are just opinions, man.
The Dawg
As for you I think, you're all, uh, a bit idiotic for not considering, Ganaan's, uh, still around. Don't you think we should, you know, fix that?
As for you I think, you're all, uh, a bit idiotic for not considering, Ganaan's, uh, still around. Don't you think we should, you know, fix that?
Enna Syke
Normally I'd have wrote it off as Happy trying to make correct guesses, but the way he worded it and the timing was too perfect, imo. He literally said he knew I was RUDE when people had to choose whether or not to help me. If he'd managed to convince them against me, we'd be down a gladiator today and an extra tonight. Two down on the first day is not how we'll win this thing.
Frankly I might be wrong about him being RUDE. If I am, hang me. There's no way you could trust me after something like that - understandable -, but as far as I'm concerned, he's the one acting the scummiest - the one that I think is most likely to be RUDE. Hey, I could be wrong, but I'm willing to take that chance because frankly, he's not helping even if he were innocent (which I highly doubt).
Attack Jeroen to get information, he says. No, that won't help at all. Jeroen's guesses are just that, guesses. He can't have gathered enough material to know anything for sure.
These four people are scum, he says. No, not true. How could he know? He could be guessing but why say he knows for sure? Why not say he thinks we are or that it's his opinion that we may be? Instead he flat out states that we are and that he knows it. Not true. At. All.
As stated, the only way he could know for sure was if he were RUDE himself and RUDE would not point out all of their own team - perhaps one to keep them safe if he is flipped, but not all of them.
All his suggestions don't make sense. He's aiming for something and I don't think it's in our best interest to listen to him. If he's innocent he needs to stand up and say that he doesn't know for sure that those people are RUDEs. But he hasn't, because he's hoping you'll all roll the way he wants.
Sorry, but I won't roll that way and if I can help it, I won't let others do so without having his shadiness pointed out.
Normally I'd have wrote it off as Happy trying to make correct guesses, but the way he worded it and the timing was too perfect, imo. He literally said he knew I was RUDE when people had to choose whether or not to help me. If he'd managed to convince them against me, we'd be down a gladiator today and an extra tonight. Two down on the first day is not how we'll win this thing.
Frankly I might be wrong about him being RUDE. If I am, hang me. There's no way you could trust me after something like that - understandable -, but as far as I'm concerned, he's the one acting the scummiest - the one that I think is most likely to be RUDE. Hey, I could be wrong, but I'm willing to take that chance because frankly, he's not helping even if he were innocent (which I highly doubt).
Attack Jeroen to get information, he says. No, that won't help at all. Jeroen's guesses are just that, guesses. He can't have gathered enough material to know anything for sure.
These four people are scum, he says. No, not true. How could he know? He could be guessing but why say he knows for sure? Why not say he thinks we are or that it's his opinion that we may be? Instead he flat out states that we are and that he knows it. Not true. At. All.
As stated, the only way he could know for sure was if he were RUDE himself and RUDE would not point out all of their own team - perhaps one to keep them safe if he is flipped, but not all of them.
All his suggestions don't make sense. He's aiming for something and I don't think it's in our best interest to listen to him. If he's innocent he needs to stand up and say that he doesn't know for sure that those people are RUDEs. But he hasn't, because he's hoping you'll all roll the way he wants.
Sorry, but I won't roll that way and if I can help it, I won't let others do so without having his shadiness pointed out.
ivoryjones
75
Sarah
This. To anyone deliberately roleplaying too much to avoid getting a clear read from people. That goes to you too YM. Not to say I'm stopping people from roleplaying, but clearly you can retain your personality and roleplay at the same time right?
Also, anyone noticed that AquaXranoX loves popping up and disappearing for absolutely no reason at all?
I don't mind switching my vote on Jeroen to get the game rolling, but I won't be entirely satisfied since I'd prefer Kat over him getting lynched. Honestly though, he doesn't seem to be making any defenses atm (probably still asleep?)
@Liberty
What was your take on Jeroen again? I seemed to have missed it.
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
someone asked me this via pm so
no you don't have to roleplay. you can post like a normal human being.
This. To anyone deliberately roleplaying too much to avoid getting a clear read from people. That goes to you too YM. Not to say I'm stopping people from roleplaying, but clearly you can retain your personality and roleplay at the same time right?
Also, anyone noticed that AquaXranoX loves popping up and disappearing for absolutely no reason at all?
I don't mind switching my vote on Jeroen to get the game rolling, but I won't be entirely satisfied since I'd prefer Kat over him getting lynched. Honestly though, he doesn't seem to be making any defenses atm (probably still asleep?)
@Liberty
What was your take on Jeroen again? I seemed to have missed it.
ivoryjones
75
Sarah
People who are not afraid for others to get a clear read from them definitely wouldn't feel the need to roleplay. From uh, prior experience, Liberty seemed to like roleplays(?) but she isn't doing that right now, so I'm leaning towards town of her ftm.
Basically, anyone who roleplayed are suspicious and deserves to get lynched..!! (we dont want anyone who makes our scumradar fuzzy do we)
People who are not afraid for others to get a clear read from them definitely wouldn't feel the need to roleplay. From uh, prior experience, Liberty seemed to like roleplays(?) but she isn't doing that right now, so I'm leaning towards town of her ftm.
Basically, anyone who roleplayed are suspicious and deserves to get lynched..!! (we dont want anyone who makes our scumradar fuzzy do we)
Enna Syke
My lean towards Jeroen is that I don't trust him... but I trust others a lot less. He could be a RUDE trying to point towards innocents as suspicious, or he could be innocent just playing it straight. He's had plenty of experience on both sides of the fence in previous games and I'm not getting a scum read from him at this time so I'm leaning more towards him being innocent.
I don't really trust anyone at the moment. High on my suspicion list is Gourd, Kat and Happy.
Also, no role playing from me this time around. I'm not feeling my character so I'm just playing straight.
My lean towards Jeroen is that I don't trust him... but I trust others a lot less. He could be a RUDE trying to point towards innocents as suspicious, or he could be innocent just playing it straight. He's had plenty of experience on both sides of the fence in previous games and I'm not getting a scum read from him at this time so I'm leaning more towards him being innocent.
I don't really trust anyone at the moment. High on my suspicion list is Gourd, Kat and Happy.
Also, no role playing from me this time around. I'm not feeling my character so I'm just playing straight.
