WHY FIRST GRADE TO 12TH IS COMPLETELY USELESS, INCLUDING PARTS OF COLLEGE ..

Chaos being the natural order
Nope. Balance is the natural order. All systems eventually return to equilibrium, though the ride can certainly be chaotic, which can be misinterpreted as a natural order in itself.

To an extent, it may still serve the people, but it will begin to feed upon the people and resources in order to sustain itself.
Only partially correct.
I mentioned to DarklordKeinor that governments become full of gluttons and nepotists because that's where those types of people gravitate to. The most organized of them are Oligarchs. Since the goal of oligarchy is always to protect the oligarchy (maintain & accumulate power), their goal eventually gets expressed in the actions of government.
Back to the main point, it's not the existence of government that's at fault for "feeding upon" to "sustain itself", but the actions of a select group of avaricious people. And ironically, it's the expansion of government that puts checks and balances on the ability of these people to parasitize society.

WE MUST CRITICIZE THE PEOPLE WHO ESTABLISH THE GOVERNMENT
Wrong again.
The apparatus of government is a work-in-progress for mankind like any technological advancement. Representative democracy is pretty good, certainly better than monarchy, but not the best. I'm sure there are better systems we can't even envision because they haven't been invented yet.
So why would you criticize the people who institute new and more effective systems of administration? You might as well criticize scientists for advancing science.

They have a vote, but once their chosen representatives are in place, other forces immediately go to work on them.
Too naive. This is the simple argument of someone who believes exercising their democratic right means ticking a box every 4 years.
You can stand on a corner and hand out pamphlets or hold a sign, you can get in touch your representative, you can organize a walkout or strike, you can even do drastic things like a hunger strike. You can do all these things without being arrested for opposing the state.

Then when the people rebel, they are the ones that history remembers as the villains. It even happened in our own American Revolution! We Americans are the only ones in the world who think Paul Revere was a hero and not a traitor. The sentiment is so prolific that written history is constantly trying to vindicate Benedict Arnold as being a man loyal to the rightful government.
I don't even know where you got this one from.
Popular culture's heroic portrayal of "rebel" is so pervasive that anybody branded as such by the media immediately receives unconditional sympathy. It's why the recent Libyan civil war was able to receive foreign intervention from us uninvolved westerners, and why the Syrian civil war was such a hard fought battle to prevent us from directly intervening.

And Benedict Arnold? That name is literally a synonym for traitor. I've seen people say to one another "you're a Benedict Arnold" because of some betrayal or broken promise.
So I have no idea whose going around trying to vindicate him.

It still gives more than it takes
Actually, if we're talking about the US government, it gives far more (to banks/corporations) then it takes (from citizens). It's kind of the whole reason for the growing class struggle building around us, and why you and I are having this conversation.

Since 1920, our government is increasingly more authoritarian.
Nope.
After WW2, the late 40s, America experienced a sudden swing towards mass populism, the ideological opposite of authoritarianism. It moved so far away from a government oriented towards protecting the elite that it did something unprecedented in all of human history : The middle class became the dominant demographic numerically. America would then go on to obliterate fascism as a viable ideology (like libertarianism is today), hold off communism, develop nuclear energy, and land on the moon.

If by "inreasingly authoritarian" you mean FDR nationalized a bunch of industrial and commercial sectors, well, that's just your opinion.

Finally, as for trust in government: many people believe that our government can be absolutely trusted.
You're just saying this to set up the rest of your paragraph when you know it blatantly isn't true. Shame on you.

Such people do not include the likes of Thomas Jefferson, Bennjamin Franklin, George Washington, John Hancock
More misinterpretation and misunderstanding on your part.
During the time of the US Constitution's creation and afterward, there were two factions. The Federalists and the Anti-Federalists who, as their name implies, were for and against a strong central government over the union.
Jefferson was an Anti-Federalist goofball who almost lost the country during the war of 1812. Fair enough.
But Benjamin Franklin and John Hancock were federalists, and George Washington was a federalist supporter though not officially a part of the party. Even if they knew that governments eventually become filled with greedy and corrupt officials, they still endorsed strengthening government at the federal level. Why, is what you should be asking yourself here.

Many people believe that our government is the best government
Well, it ain't bad. It's the best we've got now, in 2014.

Don't forget that this was the exact sentiment in Germany in the 1930s. What happened? The people gave up their rights to weapons...and what happened next was the second greatest atrocity in history
God, I hate when people make this correlation.
The jews were herded into camps because they didn't fight at all. You don't need guns to resist. Organization > Guns. An unarmed man with a plan can easily take out an armed man without one. If the nazis are coming, ambush them from the closet with a fireaxe or pair of kitchen knives. If every single day a nazi soldier investigated potential jewish hideouts could have been his last, the holocaust wouldn't have been nearly as devastating.
Even if America revoked the 2nd amendment tonight, and all guns instantly vanished tomorrow morning, it wouldn't do big scary government any good. Organization > Guns. The sit-down strike is far, far more effective at dis-empowering the ruling class and revolution than any armed uprising could ever amount to.

Nazi Germany was very popular. A large chunk of the American population supported Hitler during the 1930s.
"A large chunk" didn't support fascism anymore than "a large chunk" supports libertarianism today. The rhetoric of the time disguised the objectionable parts of fascism, and because leading members of the ruling class supported it (primarily for the union busting aspect), as well as the newspapers they controlled, fascism could be talked about at the dinner table.
In other words, fascism was only really supported by leading bankers and industrialists of the time, as well as a few peasant minions who blindly follow the ideology without asking it the big questions.

If you think our government isn't capable of something like this, consider this: HB 645, which passed a few weeks ago, gives our military the authority to corral citizens into approved holding areas in the event of emergency, and it also gives the president the power to declare martial law and emergency powers without the approval of congress or regional governors. FEMA has been digging mass graves across the nation, (I live near one of these facilities), and I have a friend at Woodlawn Cemetery who tells me that the government is trying to requisition all available cemetery space across the country. The use of predator drones in countries we are not at war with has increased, and these countries complain, but they don't challenge the U. S.'s right. Now, the FAA has lifted restrictions to allow the use of drones over American soil (though they still aren't granted access to national airspace...which means they can't fly higher than rooftops.). We have the government's assurance that they aren't ready to start using predator drones here. In 2012, Habeas Corpus was repealed from our laws along with Posse Comitatus (the law that prevents the military from acting as a police force on American soil), and the military was given the authority to indefinitely detain civilians on American soil and to remove them from American soil.
Yeah, I know all about it.
But I chalk it up to oligarchical paranoia.
The ruling class knows shit is coming to a head, so they're laying a bunch of groundwork in the hopes that it'll help them survive. It won't. They can't actually use all this neat stuff because of three things we have : Cellphones, wifi, and the internet. The type of localized media blackout you could do just a few years ago is impossible now, and the only way you can trigger a nation-wide emergency in a country the size of America is by detonating a nuclear weapon on home soil. But a false flag of that magnitude will destroy them immediately if it backfires, so they'll probably never take the gambit.
So don't worry about the FEMA stuff.

The downward spiral of our nation began when we started to think the ideas of our Founding Fathers were outmoded and obsolete.
Sorry. Nobody of any reasonable intellect thinks this.
You see the occasional media pundit stick his/her neck out and say something to that effect, but the sentiment hasn't gone any further than the right-wing reactionary TV and radio programs.



whew. I'm done.

1. No Tenure / No Pension. A Congressman collects a salary while in office
and receives no pay when they are out of office.

2. Congress (past, present & future) participates in Social Security. All
funds in the Congressional retirement fund move to the Social Security
system immediately. All future funds flow into the Social Security system,
and Congress participates with the American people. It may not be used for
any other purpose.

3. Congress can purchase their own retirement plan, just as all Americans
do.

4. Congress will no longer vote themselves a pay raise. Congressional pay
will rise by the lower of CPI or 3%.

5. Congress loses their current health care system and participates in the
same health care system as the American people.

6. Congress must equally abide by all laws they impose on the American
people.

7. All contracts with past and present Congressmen are void effective 1/1/13.
The American people did not make this contract with Congressmen. Congressmen
made all these contracts for themselves. Serving in Congress is an honor,
not a career. The Founding Fathers envisioned citizen legislators, so ours
should serve their term's), then go home and back to work.