Full Games List
Featured Games
New Games
Reviews
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Images Feedback Summary
Game Design Highlights
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engines
Engine Bulletins
What is Makerscore?
Past Events
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Post History
Chat
New to RMN?
Full Store List
RMN Music Pack (free)
REVIEW DENIED TWICE, DON'T KNOW HOW TO IMPROVE IT
Posts
Pages:
1
Fflo
View playlists
CloseHello,
I've posted last week a review for a SMBX game. Even by looking at the Tips on reviewing games (Game Design Highlights), the review got denied with a notice saying Please see our review standards.
2 days ago, I've edited the review accordingly to On reviewing and standards. I've submitted it again and it got denied for the same reason as above.
I'd like to know if there's a reviewing model or example I could apply to my review.
Or at least, can anyone from the Staff tell me what exactly didn't suit on my review ?
I've posted last week a review for a SMBX game. Even by looking at the Tips on reviewing games (Game Design Highlights), the review got denied with a notice saying Please see our review standards.
2 days ago, I've edited the review accordingly to On reviewing and standards. I've submitted it again and it got denied for the same reason as above.
I'd like to know if there's a reviewing model or example I could apply to my review.
Or at least, can anyone from the Staff tell me what exactly didn't suit on my review ?
There are a few articles on reviewing, I will edit them in in a moment.
And some basic outline and little indepth stuff by solus the heir - which is probably what should help you the most.
! http://rpgmaker.net/articles/783/ ! <- criteria and guidelines, check where your weakness may be. There are also more articles linked.
http://rpgmaker.net/articles/249/
How to get more words going by yours libby
http://rpgmaker.net/articles/1003/
Possible problems:
- Bad presentation (typos, bad formation, no introduction/summary or ending paragraph)
- Points without context (no examples, no descriptions, no reasoning as to why you think it is a certain way)
- Subjective stance (not trying to be objective, attack creator or pander creator)
- covering too little of the game
Feel free to pm me the draft! I don't mind looking over it at all. I could give you some hints and advice on what might be missing.
Good luck!
And some basic outline and little indepth stuff by solus the heir - which is probably what should help you the most.
! http://rpgmaker.net/articles/783/ ! <- criteria and guidelines, check where your weakness may be. There are also more articles linked.
http://rpgmaker.net/articles/249/
How to get more words going by yours libby
http://rpgmaker.net/articles/1003/
Possible problems:
- Bad presentation (typos, bad formation, no introduction/summary or ending paragraph)
- Points without context (no examples, no descriptions, no reasoning as to why you think it is a certain way)
- Subjective stance (not trying to be objective, attack creator or pander creator)
- covering too little of the game
Feel free to pm me the draft! I don't mind looking over it at all. I could give you some hints and advice on what might be missing.
Good luck!
Primary Reasons:
It needs to have enough words.
It needs to be spelled correctly.
It needs good grammar.
Secondary Reasons:
Review structure.
Important points aren't backed up with evidence.
Yeah, I just checked it. It's very very short - you really need to add more details. Check out my article on that. Kylaila already linked it.
There's also halibabica's article on it
http://rpgmaker.net/articles/594/
and if you are feeling particularly desperate, there's my article
http://rpgmaker.net/articles/246/
http://rpgmaker.net/articles/594/
and if you are feeling particularly desperate, there's my article
http://rpgmaker.net/articles/246/
Pages:
1
