LET'S DISCUSS: GENDER EQUALITY, IN GAMING AND IN LIFE
Posts
Okay... *takes a deep breath* "HEY CURLY! YOU'RE DOING IT WRONG, IDIOT!"
*clears throat*
I can't begin to tell you how offended I am of this picture. *twitch* I may be the quiet housewife, but I believe other women have the right to be just as strong as anyone else out there... and have the same gaming tastes!
When I was in first grade, we had an NES. It was all I did, except build model airplanes, but that's for a different story. My cousins made fun of me, all of them boys to make matters worse, because I couldn't play Mario or Megaman very well. I didn't have the reflexes to jump at the right time. My dad bought The Legend of Zelda, and I found my niche. Puzzle solving, dungeon exploring, HEY! finally the world of video gaming made sense, and I felt good at it. Soon after, my dad bought Final Fantasy, and it was a hit with me, too. Platformers were never my thing, but no one else handled an RPG or adventure like me. The boys thought FF was too slow and didn't ingage them enough. When we got a Sega Genesis, my dad had to buy a game for me specifically because Sonic wasn't going to cut it - so we picked out Shining Force. (I did play Sonic 2 because I liked Tails and the furthest I got was Oil Ocean Act 2. I don't even know how far I was into the game...) As the systems evolved, it was still the standard fare. They had to get me a game that was either overhead adventure or RPG. Now well into my 20s and holding a baby, I'm still playing mostly RPGs and monster raising games, and the occasional whatever else might be there (like Samurai Showdown).
What does this stem from? Thinking that girls can't play the same game as guys? Thinking that all girls are the quiet preppy demure types? Do those girls up in that picture even LOOK like the girls you do find playing games anyway? Give me your opinions, both girls and guys. I want to know if I'm going crazy, or is "game crazy" just trying to pick a fight?
...Just because my reflexes suck doesn't mean I should be patronized. And I'll have two daughters that'll beat the crap out of anyone in a fighter, as they have Asa to train them...
As for me: Where's my frying pan? I'm about to beat some Advertising Executive's ass. He'll smell like brused and blistered pancakes when I'm done with him.
I have a lot to say on this topic (but it's like 4 AM so it won't be now), but having two sisters, I can tell you that one reason why girls seem to have bad reflexes at videogames is because they think too damn much (I don't mean this in a demeaning way despite the tone). I notice that when girls play games like Megaman, Sonic, etc every action seems to be preceded by "SHOULD I JUMP NOW OR SHOULD I WAIT HMM WHAT SHOULD I DO" instead of just actually jumping/shooting/whatever. By the time the girl decides what action to take she's already dead due to being shot up/the platform disappearing under her.
Games like that are designed for 'action now, think later, decide never, just do', you know, just twitch reflexes without thinking about it, and I've noticed that many girls just don't seem very good at it. If more people (guys and girls alike) would take a 'Just do it' attitude to games like Megaman, Sonic, etc instead of treating every situation in the game as a life altering decision, I can guarantee you'd beat some of those previously unbeatable games!
Games like that are designed for 'action now, think later, decide never, just do', you know, just twitch reflexes without thinking about it, and I've noticed that many girls just don't seem very good at it. If more people (guys and girls alike) would take a 'Just do it' attitude to games like Megaman, Sonic, etc instead of treating every situation in the game as a life altering decision, I can guarantee you'd beat some of those previously unbeatable games!
I am also not so good with the reflexes. Not only do I suck butts at reflex-oriented videogames, but I'm also (plz don't laugh) a LARPer with the worst combat paralysis imaginable. If anything sudden happens and I'm supposed to perform instantly, I freeze up, probably for the reasons that Feld listed (I think too goddamn much :P).
On the other hand, I'm a fairly good driver, and I managed to reduce the severity of an accident when someone turned out in front of me (he did not stop at his stop sign and I didn't have one) by acting quickly. I wasn't always a good driver, though, but I guess the necessity of acting fast in an automobile sort of forced me to get better.
Not only am I rubbish at reaction-based games, but I'm also fairly bad at being observant. I can barely find anything I need to; in Oblivion, for example, I have the roughest time.
But I'd like to say I'm alright at puzzles. Sometimes I can figure things out pretty fast. Also, unrelatedly, I'm really really good at DOA Extreme Beach Volleyball (don't ask).
Here's my take on that thar advert, though: The marketing execs are not dumb. They do not believe that girls only play KITTIEZ and LET'S BE A SUPERSTAR OMIGOSH U GUYZ!!1 But they know that girls like you and I were, Suzu, the little nerds who hung around in basements and got every system when it came out... they know we're already sold.
They are not trying to get "us." They are trying to get "them."
Why advertise to someone who's already buying from you? The kind of girls pictured there DON'T play games, and what they're saying is "if you like cheerleading and playing barbie, you'll love our games!" because they want to expand their audience.
It's like how they released Mary Jane Adventures to catch the girly-girls, when all the real comic book readers had been buying Spiderman for ages.
This is a good topic. I LIKE IT VERY MUCH.
On the other hand, I'm a fairly good driver, and I managed to reduce the severity of an accident when someone turned out in front of me (he did not stop at his stop sign and I didn't have one) by acting quickly. I wasn't always a good driver, though, but I guess the necessity of acting fast in an automobile sort of forced me to get better.
Not only am I rubbish at reaction-based games, but I'm also fairly bad at being observant. I can barely find anything I need to; in Oblivion, for example, I have the roughest time.
But I'd like to say I'm alright at puzzles. Sometimes I can figure things out pretty fast. Also, unrelatedly, I'm really really good at DOA Extreme Beach Volleyball (don't ask).
Here's my take on that thar advert, though: The marketing execs are not dumb. They do not believe that girls only play KITTIEZ and LET'S BE A SUPERSTAR OMIGOSH U GUYZ!!1 But they know that girls like you and I were, Suzu, the little nerds who hung around in basements and got every system when it came out... they know we're already sold.
They are not trying to get "us." They are trying to get "them."
Why advertise to someone who's already buying from you? The kind of girls pictured there DON'T play games, and what they're saying is "if you like cheerleading and playing barbie, you'll love our games!" because they want to expand their audience.
It's like how they released Mary Jane Adventures to catch the girly-girls, when all the real comic book readers had been buying Spiderman for ages.
This is a good topic. I LIKE IT VERY MUCH.
The only reason I'm better than my kid sister at games is because its one of my main hobbys. However, when I was in the Spyro crazy back on PlayStation, and we were all living together (School etc) she picked up Spyro 2 and owned it. I just had to watch. If she spent the same amount of time, or any time rather, with games then she'd be king of the ring for sure.
So I don't believe anyone who believes girls are worse than boys in any respect, especially in gaming. There's just an overwhelming number of lonely guys with nothing to do.
So I don't believe anyone who believes girls are worse than boys in any respect, especially in gaming. There's just an overwhelming number of lonely guys with nothing to do.
@Feld: I did okay in Sonic only because I liked the characters. Mario gave me no real motivation to play, either... I wanted to play because I lived in a house full of men. I wanted to be included. My dad noticed my frustration and we soon found out that I did better with things that didn't need timed jumps over holes. Yeah, Zelda had the timing with the sword and dodging blows, but the rush of a side-view platformer still makes me mad in all sorts of ways. I don't think it's gender based. It can't be completetly gender based.
My mother hated gaming (and still does), and hated it even more when my dad took the time to teach me to play Zelda, Final Fantasy, etc.
My mother hated gaming (and still does), and hated it even more when my dad took the time to teach me to play Zelda, Final Fantasy, etc.
No, it's not solidly gender based, but if gender has anything to do with it, I can almost guarantee that my 'theory' is almost partially correct. I've never done any sort of conclusive experiment on it, but it's something I've noticed with almost every girl I've ever seen play a platformer.
Of course, this is not a bad thing! Usually it turns out that girls are better at RPGs.
Of course, this is not a bad thing! Usually it turns out that girls are better at RPGs.
It was said somewhere. But it's all about casual gamers. The ad in question isn't directed at gamers. It's directed at that huge majority which are "girly girls". And yes, they DO exist.
It's the same where they target a bunch of games (like Need for Speed or Madden) mainly for boys. The casual boy audience that is. The boys that think it's cool with American Football or fast cars.
The only real problem I see is the lacking quality in some of the "targeted" games. Kid's games suffer from the same problem. They make a subpar game that the nongamer audience will play, because they don't know better.
To be honest what kind of semi-gamer girl wouldn't play a good Sex and the City game? It's a sad fact that most games targeted at girls suck so badly (Except perhaps the Sims, though you could argue it isn't exactly targeted you're not kidding anyone.).
Alright. So personal experience and all that crap. I have two younger sisters. They game. They aren't huge gaming nerds but being around me rubs off onto anyone. My older sister plays a fair amount of games. She still tends to shy away from the "overly guy" games and jumps with glee at any release of the Sims or Harvest Moon. She has a pink DS. Of course she also plays the games that essentially are for everyone. And she always beats me in Track & Field in Barcelona for the NES. She's strangely awesome at that.
The younger of the two sisters is still sort of young and I don't know exactly what she plays. But she does have a lot of Pony and Horse-themed games. She's no stranger to kicking butt in sucky games based on stuff she likes (I'm referring to Eragon). And obviously she loves the Sims. And Runescape, for some strange reason I cannot fathom (but that's one of the other girly gamer things. They seem to be drawn to MMOs)
Of course these are only two examples but they fit pretty nicely into the "girly gamer" stereotype.
So this was a long post essentially saying that the difference between hardcore and casual is a lot larger than the whole gender thing. (Hardcore gamers of any kind play the things they like/are good. Casual gamers of any kind play the games they are offered)
It's the same where they target a bunch of games (like Need for Speed or Madden) mainly for boys. The casual boy audience that is. The boys that think it's cool with American Football or fast cars.
The only real problem I see is the lacking quality in some of the "targeted" games. Kid's games suffer from the same problem. They make a subpar game that the nongamer audience will play, because they don't know better.
To be honest what kind of semi-gamer girl wouldn't play a good Sex and the City game? It's a sad fact that most games targeted at girls suck so badly (Except perhaps the Sims, though you could argue it isn't exactly targeted you're not kidding anyone.).
Do those girls up in that picture even LOOK like the girls you do find playing games anyway?Yes, they look exactly like the girls that would play the games advertised.
Alright. So personal experience and all that crap. I have two younger sisters. They game. They aren't huge gaming nerds but being around me rubs off onto anyone. My older sister plays a fair amount of games. She still tends to shy away from the "overly guy" games and jumps with glee at any release of the Sims or Harvest Moon. She has a pink DS. Of course she also plays the games that essentially are for everyone. And she always beats me in Track & Field in Barcelona for the NES. She's strangely awesome at that.
The younger of the two sisters is still sort of young and I don't know exactly what she plays. But she does have a lot of Pony and Horse-themed games. She's no stranger to kicking butt in sucky games based on stuff she likes (I'm referring to Eragon). And obviously she loves the Sims. And Runescape, for some strange reason I cannot fathom (but that's one of the other girly gamer things. They seem to be drawn to MMOs)
Of course these are only two examples but they fit pretty nicely into the "girly gamer" stereotype.
So this was a long post essentially saying that the difference between hardcore and casual is a lot larger than the whole gender thing. (Hardcore gamers of any kind play the things they like/are good. Casual gamers of any kind play the games they are offered)
In my experience, with reflex-based games like FPSs or guitar hero type games, females are either completely unable to manage the controls, or they're the best players I know who kick everyone's ass. (The best halo 2/3 player in college was female and it made all us boys SO mad and insecure) Seems like the "average" guy can pretty much figure out any game, though.
But yes, games are not marketed to females. Some games have retarded examples of needless sexism, such as Warhammer Online's refusal to allow female tank archetypes on the evil side because theyre not "iconic." I'm all for hot chicks in games, but I still think it's totally unnecessary to cut out that option for players, male or female. World of Warcraft has female orcs, tauren, trolls, etc... not exactly the prettiest things but hey, lots of people still play them.
But yes, games are not marketed to females. Some games have retarded examples of needless sexism, such as Warhammer Online's refusal to allow female tank archetypes on the evil side because theyre not "iconic." I'm all for hot chicks in games, but I still think it's totally unnecessary to cut out that option for players, male or female. World of Warcraft has female orcs, tauren, trolls, etc... not exactly the prettiest things but hey, lots of people still play them.
author=Feldschlacht IV link=topic=2520.msg46235#msg46235 date=1227286306Woahh I disagree with this.
No, it's not solidly gender based, but if gender has anything to do with it, I can almost guarantee that my 'theory' is almost partially correct. I've never done any sort of conclusive experiment on it, but it's something I've noticed with almost every girl I've ever seen play a platformer.
Of course, this is not a bad thing! Usually it turns out that girls are better at RPGs.
The reason those females are not good at platformers is because they never played those games in the first place. I can guarantee you the exact same thing would happen with a guy if he played a game he wasn't familiar with (just like I bet most of us here suck at sports and racing games).
Also, I don't get this. I find girls to be just as good as guys in gaming. It all depends on your experience with games and how much time you invest in them. It has absolutely nothing to do with gender. Shinan and Dudesoft made some very good points. I also don't see how that picture could offend anyone when they're obviously just trying to cater to the casual female gamer. This seems to be a discussion between lifestyles and the type of person you are rather than your gender.
That picture caused me to vomit a little, in my mouth. Yes, a picture featuring three attractive girls, cheerleader types, somehow caused me to feel sick.
I think that really says all I have to say about this topic.
Also: girls are really, really good at guitar hero. Especially topless guitar hero.
I think that really says all I have to say about this topic.
Also: girls are really, really good at guitar hero. Especially topless guitar hero.
Woahh I disagree with this.
The reason those females are not good at platformers is because they never played those games in the first place. I can guarantee you the exact same thing would happen with a guy if he played a game he wasn't familiar with (just like I bet most of us here suck at sports and racing games).
Really? Interesting! I mean, I'm only basing this on my experience. I've had girls just flat out tell me the reason why they're not good at those types of games is because they 'think too much' instead of actually just acting out on their twitch reflexes. Of course it's linked to experience, and one gender isn't intrisically better than the other at video games, but considering there is a physiological and cultural effect on how one genders thought processes and pattern of thinking turn out, I don't think it's too much of a stretch to believe that one gender may be naturally, even if slightly 'better or worse' than the other at a certain type of game.
I mean, it's unfair to counter a point such as mind with 'everyone can be as good as the other'. I mean, of course! But is it a stretch to figure that assuming there is a psychological difference between the genders (which there most certainly is), at least some of it would transfer into the gaming world? That's not to say that anyone is limited of course.
author=Max McGee link=topic=2520.msg46249#msg46249 date=1227294037
Also: girls are really, really good at guitar hero. Especially topless guitar hero.
:o
Also, I was the one who first said that that advert was catering to 'casual' gamers, though I didn't put it in exactly that term. : P
Also, while it is true that girls aren't good at games because they haven't played much of them, how do you explain me and Suzu who have a more difficult time with, say, Mario, than most people?
I think there are fundamental differences in the way men and women's minds work. Neither is superior, we just think differently. For example, men are better at thinking spacially (which sometimes makes them better at parking). Women are better at multi-tasking (to make us better at taking care of families from an evolutionary standpoint). This isn't to say that women can't park and that men can't raise families... but there have been enough studies done that I believe firmly that the way in which we think is different.
author=aprilschild link=topic=2520.msg46255#msg46255 date=1227295670
I think there are fundamental differences in the way men and women's minds work. Neither is superior, we just think differently. For example, men are better at thinking spacially (which sometimes makes them better at parking). Women are better at multi-tasking (to make us better at taking care of families from an evolutionary standpoint). This isn't to say that women can't park and that men can't raise families... but there have been enough studies done that I believe firmly that the way in which we think is different.
That is the point I want to bring. I´ve read at least 3 books which somehow tell about differences between average men and women ("Men are from Mars, women are from Venus", "Why do men make sex and women make love?", "Equal Rites" from Discworld series) and that those differences in both mind and body are natural and bilogical rather than coming from social conditioning.
Let´s point that essentially all humans are female at their base, however when DNA says male, certain quantities of masculine hormone are released to turn the body and mind into male ones. However those quantities are not programmed by computer so sometimes a girl baby end up receiving a bit of masculine hormone or a baby boy might receive less masculine hormone than needed to change his body and mind completely.
Those generate girls with manly traits and boys with girly traits.
Now, those traits were "designed" by nature when humans were primitive as other animals and back then, men just had to provide food and woman had to care for the cave and bear children.
This natural division gave men awesome spatial perception and abstration to outmatch the prey and to avoid being prey by bigger predators, also a lot of sheer physical power to disable the prey in fight and handle instruments to fight.
Women got a mind prefected for multi tasking, to watch over all the kids plus be on alert for dangers which also gave her a great peripheric vision to scope everything arouns her at short distances so her kids wouldn´t go out of her view easily. Also better hearing and a sort of sixth sense.
Note that despite the default hormones distribution, practice can enhance habilities anyway, just that an average girl or boy will have those characteristics set as described above, this proved by science.
So getting back to our time...
A regular guy would have good reflexes, would navegate easily using maps, calculate speed and path of projectlies easily as well as time to jump on platforms and distance over holes. Males may be better at chasing a single target, girls would be awesome at fighting multiple enemies.
A regular girl would be more patient to handle character upgrades, take care of monsters, be immersed into a story while thinking about a puzzle and equipment sets all at the same time. Would have an easer time locating objects/secret doors on the screen. Girls are also more social so that explains MMOs, for boys MMOs are good for competition, for girls it is companionship.
I think I am generally fitting for the male concepts: I can calculate shot paths and seepds relatively okay, I suck at multi tasking, I am awesome on finding myself on maps (my friend and I used to do a joke in FF6 where he moved the airship ramdomly and said a name of a city and I had X seconds to find said city... I always won :P). My less manly point lies in slow reflexes .
Now playing games with my ex gf brought some insights: In Gundam Omni vs Zaft, where you have a semi FPS view and may fight multiple anemies I usually had a nice time use transforming mechs to fly and snipe enemies from afar, but I was easily owned by multiple targets because I can only focus on one at time unless I force myself to change lock from time to time. She on the other hand got lot easily in stages, but it was rare to see her being shot in the back by unexpected enemies. n fact she used to play RPGs with me close only so I could guide her when she got lost, unless it was a plain top view rpg, then camera was fixed and north was always up.
I think the worst offender there is Ener-G Dance Squad. God, it's like they took the six WORST games they could possibly think of that were infesting the bargain bin, and decided to pimp them out to the little girl demographic in hopes of generating sales.
Seriously, it's messed up to suggest that girls can't possibly appreciate the greatness of the "good" games, and are only good enough to play the bad games the boys won't even touch. I don't know who is buying "Ener-G Dance Squad", but I suggest we all go firebomb that person's house for encouraging game companies to make those crappy games.
I don't adhere to the stereotype that girl gamers are somehow inferior in any way, although don't take this the wrong way, dear wife, but I kick your ASS at any fighting game... except for Super Smash Bros. You have me beat there.
Seriously, it's messed up to suggest that girls can't possibly appreciate the greatness of the "good" games, and are only good enough to play the bad games the boys won't even touch. I don't know who is buying "Ener-G Dance Squad", but I suggest we all go firebomb that person's house for encouraging game companies to make those crappy games.
I don't adhere to the stereotype that girl gamers are somehow inferior in any way, although don't take this the wrong way, dear wife, but I kick your ASS at any fighting game... except for Super Smash Bros. You have me beat there.
That last bit on Asa´s post reminded me that on fighting games I always owned my ex gf, aside from Naruto Ultimate Ninja which I had trouble hitting special attacks while she would hit me with specials anytime she tried :O
The only thing I have to say about gender equality is what I overheard a priest once say when he was approached by a man and asked for help in some relationship troubles. "Women are not meant to be understood, they are meant to be loved. The same vice-versa."
And ultimately I don't see a point in trying to understand something that may not even be meant (or possible) to understand in the first place.
And ultimately I don't see a point in trying to understand something that may not even be meant (or possible) to understand in the first place.
That is an incredibly misogynistic view, Orig. What you're saying is you aren't willing to put forth the effort of understanding them simply on grounds that they are the opposite sex.
In your view then, it's ok for that ad to portray girls as vapid, brainless gamers?
In your view then, it's ok for that ad to portray girls as vapid, brainless gamers?
The best way for mutual understanding between geners is conversation (bet Asa and Suzu talk a lot for example) sure it won´t give you 100% information full time on the opposite gender, but will help you keep track of main values and how to interact better.
Aside from Equal Rites, the books I mentioned in my other post were written by couples and grounded on what many ppl from both geners had to say, most of the time when I coment things from some of those books with a woman, they agree at least partially to that, or admit that they are exceptions to a rule.
If fact, there are aspects of other males which I can´t understand actually, like in Men are from Mars and Women from Venus tthey say that men like to watch sports when stressed with a problem to feel as if they were solving another problem by suggesting things to the couch (even if the cough is not near then to listen). To me it is absurd, when I am stressed with a problem and I need to solve something else I must really have something effective like actually playing sports, videogames or participating in contests... just watching never fulfils me. But it works for many friends of mine.
Aside from Equal Rites, the books I mentioned in my other post were written by couples and grounded on what many ppl from both geners had to say, most of the time when I coment things from some of those books with a woman, they agree at least partially to that, or admit that they are exceptions to a rule.
If fact, there are aspects of other males which I can´t understand actually, like in Men are from Mars and Women from Venus tthey say that men like to watch sports when stressed with a problem to feel as if they were solving another problem by suggesting things to the couch (even if the cough is not near then to listen). To me it is absurd, when I am stressed with a problem and I need to solve something else I must really have something effective like actually playing sports, videogames or participating in contests... just watching never fulfils me. But it works for many friends of mine.
But I like Mario! And Sonic. And I just bought Alex the Kidd, Wonder Boy and some fighter game on Sega. And own everyone in the house on them! ^.^
Of course I prefer RPGs because I'm a reader and like the story/character interaction, but that don't mean I can't kick my brothers' (4 of 'em) arses in Smash Bro's or Mario Cart. I can and I will.
I think it's really more a matter of person experience and like/dislike/ If you don't like a game then you're not gonna try too hard at it now, are you? If you don't play games like that often you aren't gonna be too good at them when playing against those who've played them for years.
Don't get me wrong, though. Feld may have a point - there just isn't proper evidence to verify or deny.
As to the image? I don't like it that much. Personally I wouldn't play those games and most of the women/girls I know wouldn't touch 'em either. Take my little sister - she's into Spyro, sports, racing, Sims and music games. If we had Guitar Hero, she'd probably own it. And she's pretty girly.
Of course I prefer RPGs because I'm a reader and like the story/character interaction, but that don't mean I can't kick my brothers' (4 of 'em) arses in Smash Bro's or Mario Cart. I can and I will.
I think it's really more a matter of person experience and like/dislike/ If you don't like a game then you're not gonna try too hard at it now, are you? If you don't play games like that often you aren't gonna be too good at them when playing against those who've played them for years.
Don't get me wrong, though. Feld may have a point - there just isn't proper evidence to verify or deny.
As to the image? I don't like it that much. Personally I wouldn't play those games and most of the women/girls I know wouldn't touch 'em either. Take my little sister - she's into Spyro, sports, racing, Sims and music games. If we had Guitar Hero, she'd probably own it. And she's pretty girly.
author=Asalieri link=topic=2520.msg46294#msg46294 date=1227313502
That is an incredibly misogynistic view, Orig. What you're saying is you aren't willing to put forth the effort of understanding them simply on grounds that they are the opposite sex.
In your view then, it's ok for that ad to portray girls as vapid, brainless gamers?
Weird that you say I have a female-hating view when my entire point was to love them regardless of your comprehension of them. Hell, love anyone regardless of your comprehension of them. I'm not putting forth the effort to understand women - no, understand anyone else in general - not because I'm in anyway misogynistic or prejudice, but because you can't. Sure, you can learn to better interact and know each other a little more, but one person will never reach the point where they fully understand someone else.
And as for the ad: it's an ad. It's biased and sexist and stupid and stereotypical and WE ALL KNOW IT IS, and so it shouldn't mean anything to anyone of broader intellect. (Us, for example.) Girls aren't all vapid, brainless gamers, neither are all guys. And don't we know this? We know a girl might be better at Mario Kart than a guy. A guy might be better at Super Smash Bros than a girl. Girly girls can be hardcore gamers and manly men can read Nicholas Sparks novels. Does this have anything to do with their gender? No, of course not. So what're we arguing about? We are singular, all females aren't the same and all males aren't the same. We've all got our own pros and cons. We're all perfectly fucked up in our own ways. At least that's my opinion, and I can get into a philosophical rant on how it's okay to disagree, but I'll spare you that.