LIZARDMAN_PRINCESS'S PROFILE

author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
in addition, i had a joke here that got deleted and have upgraded lizardman princess to ultimate confirmed town mk. II in my 5 page excel spreadsheet.

author=LockeZ

author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
lockez is just posting about the setup, avoiding talking about players, and feigning ignorance over stuff no one could have possibly missed (actually impossible.) im going to post a giant case since i see no momentum.

This should be obvious, but I missed the list of Lavos's powers because it was inside of a hide tag for some reason. I don't feel like missing something that was intentionally hidden from my view is "literally impossible."

So if you want a scum read from me right now, it's probably going to be Cavedog actually. Earlier I couldn't decide if he was acting super towny or completely garbage. But none of his one-sentence posts are actually going anywhere and a lot of them bother me because they seem designed to throw suspicion on people while avoiding explanations.

For example, he quoted a demonlord5000 post and said that "demonlord's posts from here-forward don't look too great" but didn't give any explanation as to why he felt that was true, and didn't quote or describe any of demonlord's later posts. That vote against Fomar was definitely questionable, because Fomar had said that he believed the town power roles were equivalent to core CT characters, and that's something scum would pick up on if that's information they had too (though at this point I don't know if it's actually true or not). So maybe demonlord saw that and thought Fomar was likely to have a power role. But after going through the rest of demonlord's posts after that, I can't really find anything else that looks bad. So Cavedog's comment there looks weird and bad to me, like he's trying to make something out to be bigger than it really is. And frankly the only reason I even noticed that other stuff about demonlord's vote is because Cavedog pointed out that post... but Cavedog didn't say any of that stuff. I think Cavedog was just hoping someone else would point it out, so he wouldn't have to take credit for throwing shade on demonlord when he turns out to actually be town. Which is why I think it's more likely to be a meaningless error, and I think demonlord is innocent and Cavedog is much scum.

Another point: the bit about me not seeing the list of Lavos's powers is classic misdirection. I don't feel like pretending to do that would even make sense for scum. What would their goal be exactly? To hope that literally every single other player also missed it? Cave doesn't care whether it makes sense or not though, it's just something he can point at and say "Look, he did this thing that isn't normal, GET HIM" and hope that at least one person falls for it and starts thinking more suspiciously of me. Or that it at least distracts us from actually scumhunting for another few hours.

He also keeps out throwing out stupid bullshit posts like "my joke got deleted. anyway voting my friend is a scumtell" and "i'm looking at the meme content in muffle's posts, and let me say: i'm convinced. confirmed town always protect" which seem to me to be factory-designed to make him look like he wasn't being serious with his votes against me, so he can avoid suspicion later when I flip town. He is banking on the fact that people don't expect him to take the game seriously, in order to avoid taking responsibility for his actions, while trying to lead people against the most dangerous town player he can. Half the players have role claimed, and everyone seems to agree that psy is town, so he can either attack me, cap_h, or someone who doesn't typically contribute to town's case (muffle/lizard/demonlord). Apparently he's picked me.

Also, if it seems like I'm reading too much into his posts, that's because this read on Cavedog is longer than everything Cavedog has said in the entire game. He is just making random one-sentence jabs and hoping your own brain will fill in the reasoning with whatever you want it to be. He isn't actually contributing anything.

author=Muffle
Lizard yes, vote for people you think are suspicious. It's just common for people to vote and then say WHY they voted in the same post, your reason was in different posts and the vote was after the reason, so it seemed like that wasn't your reason. It was miscommunication than anything else, you're good.

Also tip, voting right off the bat without conversating when there's plenty of time might seem suspicious or aggressive scum. Most of us say, "Hey I think this person is suspicious cuz of this." and then conversate to see if we can get more information on it and a train going. That's why a few of us were like, "Wait, you're already voting? Without talking with us first?..??""

Also conversate/ing is not a word? There's a red squiggly under it...

Before Cave even has to post their thing on LockeZ, I'm down for the vote. I already said it and Cave put it in better words, LockeZ is my most favored lynch today. I'm pretty comfortable with it. I'm worried about hammer and my math skills so I'll wait for LockeZ (and anyone else) to say what they want about this.