DRAGON FIN SOUP - TACTICAL ROGUELIKE RPG

It's so HD it's retro!

(Why did you post the exact same thing here twice?)

Anyways, you guys should probably make a game page for all of this as this type of thing is against the site’s rules in regards to advertising on the forums. The game itself looks pretty nice, but it’s not really my cup of tea. But I’m sure other people might be interested in this on here if you make a game page for it!

Just go to Submissions and then Submit Game. Couldn't be any easier. :)

author=Addit
Anyways, you guys should probably make a game page for all of this as this type of thing is against the site’s rules in regards to advertising on the forums. The game itself looks pretty nice, but it’s not really my cup of tea. But I’m sure other people might be interested in this on here if you make a game page for it!

Just go to Submissions and then Submit Game. Couldn't be any easier. :)

I was wondering if that's actually okay, because of all the platforms this is supposed to be on. I suppose it could be listed under "Other" or "Custom", but...

I dunno. I guess it wouldn't hurt to try to submit this as a gamepage?

The game looks pretty, and the title would net you an easy victory on Iron Chef.

Considering it was the last post in the thread? Within a day? No, it's not silly. If someone had posted after the last post, then fine. If it'd been a few days, then fine again. But that isn't the case and so it stands.

author=Liberty
Considering it was the last post in the thread? Within a day? No, it's not silly. If someone had posted after the last post, then fine. If it'd been a few days, then fine again. But that isn't the case and so it stands.

Yes, it is silly. What compelling argument do you have against relevant, non-abusive multi-posting? Where is the harm? Here is the harm in forbidding multi-posting: Users are not informed that new information has been added to a thread.

The games art style is similar to old SNES in its look but the art quality is at HD level.

This doesn't really make any sense. SNES game "art style" is pixel art, but even some games had different styles. None of which can be called "SNES". Using the word SNES is more of a buzz word to trick old gamers into linking their old feelings of SNES to your game.

One of the few legitimate games that can claim that is 3D Dot Game Heroes.

This looks more like a Pixar movie.

Deep Tactical Combat - Combat features multiple tactical elements such as directional damage, various ranged attacks, melee, magic, DOT and AOA. The damage model features blunt, piercing and slashing damage types as well as elemental damage, projectile damage and defense. You can perform Backstabs, sneak around and so on. Over 15 equipment slots and dual-wielding feature offer interesting choices of gear combinations.

That sounds like pretty basic combat to me. Watching the video also makes it look very standard. Doesn't mean it's bad or unfun, but again using a buzz word "deep combat".

For example one of the features we would love to add is Morgiana

If you really wanted to add her, you would. Instead of holding her hostage until you get more money. It's so lame to see people limit their games like that. One of the negative impacts kickstarter is having. Seeing that kind of thing instantly sours the devs and the game, imo.

Does forum access only come from buying the game? That's a new one to me.

The graphics look cool and it's a decent concept. Some of the animations look a little stiff, like Red Robin running through the forest in the video and some of the attacks. But the monster animations look great. Looks like you made a lot of money, grats.