Full Games List
Featured Games
New Games
Reviews
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Images Feedback Summary
Game Design Highlights
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engines
Engine Bulletins
What is Makerscore?
Past Events
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Post History
Chat
New to RMN?
Full Store List
RMN Music Pack (free)
VILLAINOUS EVENT?
Posts
Liberty
View playlists
CloseBeautiful Escape: Dungeoneer.
The villain was the player. There was no villain that was not the player bar one and even that person was a villain. You'd have to play to understand.
The villain was the player. There was no villain that was not the player bar one and even that person was a villain. You'd have to play to understand.
Kaliesto
583
Follow how Nightblade handled his legacy series. It's really that simple. He gives attention to BOTH sides instead of being completely one-sided. If you can do both sides then you got a really good story on your hands.
A very good example would also be the following as it was rare for RPGs to do what they did:
Xenogears
Xenosaga series.
They focused on both sides of the conflict. It does not have to be some godly story as long you got something in mind to put down on paper, but the characters goals/conflicts/emotions have to be believable or else the story comes off the rails.
It's something I did notice sometimes in RMN games. The villains starts off ok, but then it all falls apart due to lack of attention/detail/lack of personal scenes/their point of view/sometimes just plain out dumb. This also applies to heroes as well that I've seen.
I also found it interesting that it was the first time in a RMN game that I got to briefly control a villain in Demon Legacy during story plot points. I think this makes a game more interesting. I think most RMN devs should try some sort of balancing act between hero, and villain segments.
A very good example would also be the following as it was rare for RPGs to do what they did:
Xenogears
Xenosaga series.
They focused on both sides of the conflict. It does not have to be some godly story as long you got something in mind to put down on paper, but the characters goals/conflicts/emotions have to be believable or else the story comes off the rails.
It's something I did notice sometimes in RMN games. The villains starts off ok, but then it all falls apart due to lack of attention/detail/lack of personal scenes/their point of view/sometimes just plain out dumb. This also applies to heroes as well that I've seen.
I also found it interesting that it was the first time in a RMN game that I got to briefly control a villain in Demon Legacy during story plot points. I think this makes a game more interesting. I think most RMN devs should try some sort of balancing act between hero, and villain segments.
NebelSoft
33
author=Kaliesto
Follow how Nightblade handled his legacy series. It's really that simple. He gives attention to BOTH sides instead of being completely one-sided. If you can do both sides then you got a really good story on your hands.
A very good example would also be the following as it was rare for RPGs to do what they did:
Xenogears
Xenosaga series.
Furthermore, in Breath of Fire 4 you even get to solo-play as the "Villain" Fou-Lu a few times. He's a really nice guy actually - just (while you play) a lot of shit happens to him because of several greedy/ nasty people, that f*cks him up so bad... (I don't want to spoiler for those who haven't played it yet.. but I cried manly teary) XD I so understand him...
