Full Games List
Featured Games
New Games
Reviews
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Images Feedback Summary
Game Design Highlights
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engines
Engine Bulletins
What is Makerscore?
Past Events
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Post History
Chat
New to RMN?
Full Store List
RMN Music Pack (free)
[GAME OVER] SPY VS. MAFIA
Posts
TangledLion
618
TangledLion
View playlists
Closeauthor=pianotm
There are 13 players. There are 6 votes. As the voting stands currently, a total of 11 votes are needed for hammer.
Not saying it makes Hammer, it's just that the tally is inaccurate.
pianotm
There are 13 players. There are 8 votes. As the voting stands currently, a total of 11 votes are needed for hammer. Isrieri didn't cancel his previous vote, and corrected for TangledLion.
Thank you!
*sigh*
I made the apology and canceled my vote on LockeZ because I HAD nothing to go on. Like, the reason I made that initial vote to begin with was because day 1 has nothing to go on to begin with + meta reasons. Then I kind of self-reflected when I saw Libby's post on how meta-accusations are potentially harmful and Isrieri's post regarding Kloe's innocence and I decided to drop my vote so I can force myself to pay more attention.
For the "scum list," as Yellow Magic calls it, that wasn't a scum-list. I actually didn't adamantly say anyone was scum, moreso I gave my thoughts as to who I am sure isn't scum and who I can't get a read on. It's a failed attempt at reading people for the most part, but to be fair, it's not like I'm good at reading people in general and I've only been in two other Mafia games, both of which I had a relatively short life in. So I have yet to really develop a consistent playstyle?
Then again, it seems like "make myself look scummy at every turn" seems to be a consistent thing of mine... And it doesn't work out as people are, once again, bandwagoning for my lynch.
I made the apology and canceled my vote on LockeZ because I HAD nothing to go on. Like, the reason I made that initial vote to begin with was because day 1 has nothing to go on to begin with + meta reasons. Then I kind of self-reflected when I saw Libby's post on how meta-accusations are potentially harmful and Isrieri's post regarding Kloe's innocence and I decided to drop my vote so I can force myself to pay more attention.
For the "scum list," as Yellow Magic calls it, that wasn't a scum-list. I actually didn't adamantly say anyone was scum, moreso I gave my thoughts as to who I am sure isn't scum and who I can't get a read on. It's a failed attempt at reading people for the most part, but to be fair, it's not like I'm good at reading people in general and I've only been in two other Mafia games, both of which I had a relatively short life in. So I have yet to really develop a consistent playstyle?
Then again, it seems like "make myself look scummy at every turn" seems to be a consistent thing of mine... And it doesn't work out as people are, once again, bandwagoning for my lynch.
Ratty I am going to copy and paste your 'scum list' (actually more like nothing list) for posterity:
Out of 13 people mentioned in this post, you only had any sort of insight on the first couple.
why on Earth did you even need to mention the last eight if you couldn't get a read on them?
You are literally the only person so far apparently compelled to comment on everyone - why is that?
author=Ratty524
So far:
fearful reads as town to me, but my reason might be a bit too meta. His posting style is barely different from his regular posts on the forums, so I'm inclined to take his word.
I'm leaning towards town with Kloe based on Isrieri's reasoning, though I'm still keeping watch. What made me suspicious of her to begin with is
oddRabbit... Part of me STRONGLY wants to say town but I don't know. The confusing logic of his alibi could either be painfully honest or some kind of fake-out... Actually no, this really feels like a non-scum oddRabbit to me.
LockeZ could be either.
Gourde hasn't contributed anything useful enough.
Liberty hasn't either, but being that she's an Aussie and needs sleep I kind of understand why she would make such a post.
Isrieri started off with a joke post but other than that I have no read on him.
Yellow Magic started off with a mocking spam then makes random lynch call to LockeZ. I feel like this would be scummy if I didn't know that Yellow Magic almost always plays like this every game, so welp I don't know.
NeverSilent gives me no reading.
Neither does TungermanU but he's posted more by comparision.
The only post psy-wombats made was a suggestion to lynch the random lynchers.
and Joyless' first post was in response to something else entirely.
tldr this is a giant "I don't frickin' know who anyone is" post.
Out of 13 people mentioned in this post, you only had any sort of insight on the first couple.
why on Earth did you even need to mention the last eight if you couldn't get a read on them?
You are literally the only person so far apparently compelled to comment on everyone - why is that?
Um, okay. by the way, I noticed that your part re: Kloe is incomplete:
Seems pretty strange no? You definitely spent at least a couple minutes writing this response and then you don't even finish the part about Kloe - arguably the most important part at that.
fearful reads as town to me, but my reason might be a bit too meta. His posting style is barely different from his regular posts on the forums, so I'm inclined to take his word.
I'm leaning towards town with Kloe based on Isrieri's reasoning, though I'm still keeping watch. What made me suspicious of her to begin with is
oddRabbit... Part of me STRONGLY wants to say town but I don't know. The confusing logic of his alibi could either be painfully honest or some kind of fake-out... Actually no, this really feels like a non-scum oddRabbit to me.
Seems pretty strange no? You definitely spent at least a couple minutes writing this response and then you don't even finish the part about Kloe - arguably the most important part at that.
I actually do this type of thing a lot, by the way.
When I'm working on a long post, and I come to a point in the post that requires me to actually think a bit, I usually jump ahead and start writing the rest of the post, and try to fill in the gaps later.
The question in you case would be: Why would you have to think hard about why you found Kloe suspicious?
I can think of only one answer: You were trying to fabricate something.
#lynch Ratty524
When I'm working on a long post, and I come to a point in the post that requires me to actually think a bit, I usually jump ahead and start writing the rest of the post, and try to fill in the gaps later.
The question in you case would be: Why would you have to think hard about why you found Kloe suspicious?
I can think of only one answer: You were trying to fabricate something.
#lynch Ratty524
That's actually a pretty good point YM.
It may just be he accedentally deleted a chunk, which I have done in the past, but your theory is more likely and means we have ever so slightly more than a stab in the dark.
It may just be he accedentally deleted a chunk, which I have done in the past, but your theory is more likely and means we have ever so slightly more than a stab in the dark.
The lynching of ratty is coming off as scummy to me considering how early it is. I'm definitely going to take a good look at who voted for him if he's lynched.
Um... isn't majority like half plus one? So in this case, 7, not 11? Or am I thinking of something else?
Oh wow... I'm incompetent. I probably forgot to fill that part in.
To answer your question. It was these posts:
So given the choice to lynch two people who call out dumb random lynches, she chooses to spare LockeZ because he's "useful" and lynch me. The defense towards LockeZ came off as too unusual to be a coincidence, in my eyes.
Also this:
Almost solidifying her favor of LockeZ. I really gave me the sense that the two were working together in some fashion. Then I saw this post:
And I was convinced to back down. Still, I just have a baseless hunch that something is off with her based on the previous quotes I mentioned.
To answer your question. It was these posts:
author=Kloe
Well, I gueeeeess we could, but then we'd lose LockeZ and he could be really useful!
I say we lynch Ratty by your logic but then that makes me who you'd lynch so... I'm gonna not say who we should lynch for now.
So given the choice to lynch two people who call out dumb random lynches, she chooses to spare LockeZ because he's "useful" and lynch me. The defense towards LockeZ came off as too unusual to be a coincidence, in my eyes.
Also this:
author=Kloe
Well if we start randomly lynching, more often than not, LockeZ would die, that's just how life works.
Almost solidifying her favor of LockeZ. I really gave me the sense that the two were working together in some fashion. Then I saw this post:
author=Isrieri
It's no more than that she's acting similar to how she did last game. Her reactionary outcries against immediate lynches is normally a bit suspect but think about it: Why would she want to shout down lynches right as soon as the day starts? I sure don't know.
And I was convinced to back down. Still, I just have a baseless hunch that something is off with her based on the previous quotes I mentioned.
Oh and to respond to Yellow's other question, it's because I take a damn long while to backtrack to the pages of this thread to find the right quotes I need to reference.
TangledLion
618
author=Yellow Magic
I actually do this type of thing a lot, by the way.
When I'm working on a long post, and I come to a point in the post that requires me to actually think a bit, I usually jump ahead and start writing the rest of the post, and try to fill in the gaps later.
The question in you case would be: Why would you have to think hard about why you found Kloe suspicious?
I can think of only one answer: You were trying to fabricate something.
#lynch Ratty524
Nice Detective work, I did not notice that! Now I feel a Bit more confident in my vote...
Liberty
Um... isn't majority like half plus one? So in this case, 7, not 11? Or am I thinking of something else?
Oh, yes, if he gets 7 votes, definitely. In fact, the way votes are, if he gets just one more vote, it's hammer. At the time, it was 11 provided he didn't get any more votes on him.
Votes are as follows:
2 oddRabbit: TungerManU, LockeZ
5 Ratty524:TangledLion, NeverSilent, Kloe, oddRabbit, TangledLion, Yellow Magic
1 LockeZ:Ratty524, Yellow Magic
1 TangledLion: Isrieri
Oh wait, Yellow Magic's cancellation and switch to Ratty means Ratty needs 2 more votes for hammer.
2 oddRabbit: TungerManU, LockeZ
5 Ratty524:
1 LockeZ:
1 TangledLion: Isrieri
Oh wait, Yellow Magic's cancellation and switch to Ratty means Ratty needs 2 more votes for hammer.
Oh fuck it.
Things aren't always BLACK and WHITE
There's always a list to choose from, and the chooser on the third day will be BLACK
We have code names for a reason, and this is not a secure line.
The ORANGES will give out more data each day.
Also WHITE surpremcy.
#lynch TangledLion
Things aren't always BLACK and WHITE
There's always a list to choose from, and the chooser on the third day will be BLACK
We have code names for a reason, and this is not a secure line.
The ORANGES will give out more data each day.
Also WHITE surpremcy.
#lynch TangledLion
TangledLion
618
author=Ratty524
Oh fuck it.
Things aren't always BLACK and WHITE
There's always a list to choose from, and the chooser on the third day will be BLACK
We have code names for a reason, and this is not a secure line.
The ORANGES will give out more data each day.
Also WHITE surpremcy.
#lynch TangledLion
Well, Thanks for outing yourself as Mafia You Derp, Yes I AM The Double Agent, Not that is matters, Green Can't Kill me on his own...
