AMERICAN EXCEPTIONALISM: I DRANK THE KOOL-AID. DID YOU?
Posts
author=McDohl link=topic=2433.msg43632#msg43632 date=1226671696Look, the last thing our forum needs is a fear of personal attacks for posting in a serious discussion topic. "What a maroon! You're nothing more than an intellectual jeuvenile!" is not a proper response. Your second post, where you go to effort of explaining yourself, is quite excellent.author=kentona link=topic=2433.msg43577#msg43577 date=1226630598author=McDohl link=topic=2433.msg43573#msg43573 date=1226629833
Oh how cute. Now you've actually explained your position and was able to be demeaning and arrogant at the same time! Awwwww.
(And the obvious implication of your first dismissive reply was that first year PS students are know-nothing intellectual jeuveniles. That was pretty ad hominem.)
The cry of "ZOMG ad hominemmmzzzz!!!!!1111" only works if the statements are a fallacy. First year PS students are, in fact, know-nothing intellectual juveniles. It's their first year. They are, by definition, juvenile!
I know, because I've been one! There's only so much shit you learn when you take PS101, and most of it is a truncated, collapsible form of "okay, here's America and GO!" where students are completely left hanging and jump to the same inane, ridiculous conclusions that anti-establishment is the way to go.
I don't want the RMN forums to become a toxic environment.
As probably the only conferred historian posting in this thread, all I have to say is this:
Every nation now and forever believes themselves to be exceptional in some way or another. This is part of the nature of nationalism. The case for American Exceptionalim as a kinder/gentler brand of imperial discourse is tenuous at best, and is probably judged by the morals of our time similar to how past empires were judged by the morals of theirs.
Every nation now and forever believes themselves to be exceptional in some way or another. This is part of the nature of nationalism. The case for American Exceptionalim as a kinder/gentler brand of imperial discourse is tenuous at best, and is probably judged by the morals of our time similar to how past empires were judged by the morals of theirs.
For the record I've got my BA in Sociology with a focus in social theory, and am fairly well travelled. I'm not an ignorant first year student, nor a bitter Canadian. I'm one who's against what I consider elitist nationalism, and would like to know how people who seem very intelligent and well informed about a wide variety of issues believe that it's a viable way to think, because I can't comprehend it, and would like to understand the way of thinking.
author=kentona link=topic=2433.msg43638#msg43638 date=1226674040
I don't want the RMN forums to become a toxic environment.
You've read way too much into one line of text, and you are completely overreacting.
author=Canuck link=topic=2433.msg43647#msg43647 date=1226680567
For the record I've got my BA in Sociology with a focus in social theory, and am fairly well travelled. I'm not an ignorant first year student, nor a bitter Canadian. I'm one who's against what I consider elitist nationalism, and would like to know how people who seem very intelligent and well informed about a wide variety of issues believe that it's a viable way to think, because I can't comprehend it, and would like to understand the way of thinking.
Because being elite is not a bad thing.
Blind nationalism is deadly. Elitism is not.
Let me clarify that I consider our cultural/technological achievements as our exceptionalism, not our empire. The last eight years have been a failed attempt at a neo-conservative philosophy toward foreign policy and use of our military. That said, I think things will get a lot better as far as that goes. I hope so anyway. (Our new president better not let us down)
As probably the only conferred historian posting in this thread, all I have to say is this:
Blitzen, would you kindly clarify your exact meaning of the bolded words there?
And this thread is NOT going the same way as the abortion thread went?
Personally, I believe we Americans shouldn't police the world anymore. We should take care of our own a lot better than we are currently doing, and stop worrying so much about what country is likely to attack us at every turn. As unlikely a hope as it is, i'd like to see more of our jobs come back home to us, where we need em'.
We're an awesome country. We can be even better, however. I don't use words like "BEST" or "FLAG" or "PATRIOTIC" because such words lead to mindless arrogant nationalism, which is never constructive.
Personally, I believe we Americans shouldn't police the world anymore. We should take care of our own a lot better than we are currently doing, and stop worrying so much about what country is likely to attack us at every turn. As unlikely a hope as it is, i'd like to see more of our jobs come back home to us, where we need em'.
We're an awesome country. We can be even better, however. I don't use words like "BEST" or "FLAG" or "PATRIOTIC" because such words lead to mindless arrogant nationalism, which is never constructive.
We? Asalieri you know you're basically ze germanz now anyway right. :P
Anyway, this thread really, really is going the same way the abortion thread went.
Oh, incidentally, I never meant to sound overly nationalistic when I said that I used to think America was the "best" country in the world. I only meant relativistically speaking. More accurately, I historically have felt that America was the LEAST SHITTY country in the world to live in. Now, not so much.
Anyway, this thread really, really is going the same way the abortion thread went.
Oh, incidentally, I never meant to sound overly nationalistic when I said that I used to think America was the "best" country in the world. I only meant relativistically speaking. More accurately, I historically have felt that America was the LEAST SHITTY country in the world to live in. Now, not so much.
Ah live here, that don't mean ah'm LOVIN' IT, Max!
It's a livin'. Whaddaya expect, with all our jobs going overseas?
Trust me, the US is still one of the best places to live in the world (provided you have a job, don't live in any of the bad neighborhoods and don't watch anything on TV that might make you wanna keep a loaded gun nearby) I miss my friends and the food the most.
I wouldn't mind parting with the flags-grafted-to-the-insides-of-their-eyelids south, however.
It's a livin'. Whaddaya expect, with all our jobs going overseas?
Trust me, the US is still one of the best places to live in the world (provided you have a job, don't live in any of the bad neighborhoods and don't watch anything on TV that might make you wanna keep a loaded gun nearby) I miss my friends and the food the most.
I wouldn't mind parting with the flags-grafted-to-the-insides-of-their-eyelids south, however.
Sadly, Asalieri, it's not the United States flag the southerners have in their hearts. :(
Blitzen thinks that because he has a four year degree in history that he is a professional historian and therefore the only source of knowledge of the subject. I've have a few arguments with him previously on similar topics. :)
By that logic, McDohl is also a professional political strategist and cultural expert on all things Japan.
I have a tendency to dislike when someone starts their argument off with "I'm an expert", as if that alone automatically justifies all your opinions.
Someone should probably warn me for this as I am now derailing the topic. Sorry folks, and sorry Blizen -- I still think you're an awesome little canuckian.
author=Max McGee link=topic=2433.msg43681#msg43681 date=1226689461As probably the only conferred historian posting in this thread, all I have to say is this:
Blitzen, would you kindly clarify your exact meaning of the bolded words there?
Blitzen thinks that because he has a four year degree in history that he is a professional historian and therefore the only source of knowledge of the subject. I've have a few arguments with him previously on similar topics. :)
By that logic, McDohl is also a professional political strategist and cultural expert on all things Japan.
I have a tendency to dislike when someone starts their argument off with "I'm an expert", as if that alone automatically justifies all your opinions.
Someone should probably warn me for this as I am now derailing the topic. Sorry folks, and sorry Blizen -- I still think you're an awesome little canuckian.
I'm really not sure of the relation between superpower (which America is) and best country. I don't see a link. The USSR wasn't the second best country during the cold war.
I'm also not sure of this idea of America policing the world. What conflict did America lead the way in that wasn't done purely to benefit themselves? Or are we including NATO and UN peacekeeping missions? When did America police the world above other countries?
I like this discussion and think it's pretty civil. I'm really curious about Harmonic and Holbert's opinion's especially, but only because I really liked their responses. I'm sure others have equally interesting opinions.
I'm also not sure of this idea of America policing the world. What conflict did America lead the way in that wasn't done purely to benefit themselves? Or are we including NATO and UN peacekeeping missions? When did America police the world above other countries?
I like this discussion and think it's pretty civil. I'm really curious about Harmonic and Holbert's opinion's especially, but only because I really liked their responses. I'm sure others have equally interesting opinions.
To clarify a few of my previous points, mostly to Canuck...
I don't think the United States has some sort of mystic aura about it that leads me to believe it is special. I don't believe we have a divine right. It is just a mere coincidence that I happened to be born in what is currently the world's only superpower that also happens to be an advanced western democracy. I know America still has some maturing to do socially, but with every passing generation progress is made on that front.
I consider America the "best" country but that does not mean I consider other western-style democracies terrible. In fact, I find countries like Sweden and Switzerland to be superb -- but how important are they outside of their own sphere? America doesn't do anything great, but we do a lot of things well. I know that western Europe and Canada have passed us on things like law, social policy, human rights, etc, but not by much and the basis for their gains all have deep roots to America. Many high profile European judges and lawyers studied here and our own court systems were once well respected, though that image has been battered as we have regressed due to the rise of conservatism over the last forty years. Such a movement would be extremely easy to replicate in other countries as well, as even Canada and Britain are slowly shifting back to the right. Do not take this for granted.
And no, despite kentona's musings, the Conservative Party of Canada is not more liberal than the Democratic Party of the United States. It's a catchy saying, though. Do not confuse thinly veiled ideology with actual policy. About the only difference between the Canadian Conservatives and the American Republicans is that the Canadians do not justify their positions with religious rhetoric (though some do). I suppose that might make a difference to kentona, but the end result is the same.
American higher education is an odd mix; we have a combination of cheap or essentially free (unless your parents are well off or if you are going to an out-of-state location) public colleges and exorbently expensive private colleges. It's hard to understand; some of the top universities here are public yet even they are only a fraction of the cost of some of the worst private universities. Our medical system is a bit of a travesty cost-wise, but almost the entirety of our poor and elderly are covered through the state Medicare/Medicaid/SCHIP programs. The ones that really feel it are the middle class who get practically no state help and rely on their employers. We have a functioning welfare system for poor families and the elderly as well, though I fear there are many young people, mothers in particular, that seem perpetually stuck in it.
As for peacekeeping missions abroad that American was involved with that had no direct benefit for them, I would mention our campaign in Yugoslavia in 1999 to prevent the further genocide of the Albanians by the Serbs. There is also the (small) peacekeeping contingent Reagan sent to Beirut during a civil war in Lebanon that ended in tragedy. It's really hard to cite efforts in which the U.S. would not somehow benefit due to how much we have at stake in the world. Isolationism is impossible for us now, nor should we look to it even if given the chance.
I am pretty sure the raw power of our military has dissuaded more wars than it has started, and we carry that terrible burden so the rest of the western world can sleep relatively easy at night. China is still peaceful for a reason. Though Pax Americana may be waning, it has served as a stabilizing force for sometime.
As for the World War II debate, the war on the eastern front had Germany pressuring Russia for most of the early war effort (though never quite successful). I don't know why you keep using the Battle of Britain as your ace in this -- if Britain was so safe afterwards, America would not have needed to supply them with nearly 30% of their military expenditures over the next several years. Britain military was nearly bankrupt and the threat to them was still very real, and Britain continued to drain resources long after that particular battle ended. Do not confuse Britain's "limit break" with a permanent German defeat in the region. This is kind of irrelevant to the topic, however.
I love my country, despite its flaws. It has nothing to do with it being a superpower (though it certainly doesn't hurt -- I would have hated growing up in Congo). I don't consider it elitism to think that my country is the best (though you may not agree with that, certainly you can understand why I might think it true), because I don't have mean spirits about it. I certainly don't look down on other countries. Well, most of them anyways. I did, however, threaten to move to Canada if Bush was re-elected in 2004. I am glad that was an idle threat since I don't think I could live there for climate reasons. I lived a couple of hours from the border now and it is COLD. But have you never rooted for a home town sports team? It's the same concept, but on a much bigger scale. I will also tell you Iowa is the best state in the United States (harmonic will agree, and everyone else will disagree.) I think your thoughts of nationalism and patriotism are skewed by your ideology. You're a pretty leftist guy. But you don't speak for everyone (nor do I). Why you rate American nationalism with China's and Japan's (read: scary) strikes me as odd, especially when you have countries in the EU that express just as much nationalism, if not more, like France. I know Canada has no shortage of nationalists.
Just ask Blitzen, and he will sing you a song about maple syrup and zippers.
Perhaps the nationalism of pseudo-socialist countries is not quite as terrifying to you as you share that worldview?
Since apparently you have to qualify your posts with some sort of intellectual pedigree, my major is political science with an emphasis in international relations.
I don't think the United States has some sort of mystic aura about it that leads me to believe it is special. I don't believe we have a divine right. It is just a mere coincidence that I happened to be born in what is currently the world's only superpower that also happens to be an advanced western democracy. I know America still has some maturing to do socially, but with every passing generation progress is made on that front.
I consider America the "best" country but that does not mean I consider other western-style democracies terrible. In fact, I find countries like Sweden and Switzerland to be superb -- but how important are they outside of their own sphere? America doesn't do anything great, but we do a lot of things well. I know that western Europe and Canada have passed us on things like law, social policy, human rights, etc, but not by much and the basis for their gains all have deep roots to America. Many high profile European judges and lawyers studied here and our own court systems were once well respected, though that image has been battered as we have regressed due to the rise of conservatism over the last forty years. Such a movement would be extremely easy to replicate in other countries as well, as even Canada and Britain are slowly shifting back to the right. Do not take this for granted.
And no, despite kentona's musings, the Conservative Party of Canada is not more liberal than the Democratic Party of the United States. It's a catchy saying, though. Do not confuse thinly veiled ideology with actual policy. About the only difference between the Canadian Conservatives and the American Republicans is that the Canadians do not justify their positions with religious rhetoric (though some do). I suppose that might make a difference to kentona, but the end result is the same.
American higher education is an odd mix; we have a combination of cheap or essentially free (unless your parents are well off or if you are going to an out-of-state location) public colleges and exorbently expensive private colleges. It's hard to understand; some of the top universities here are public yet even they are only a fraction of the cost of some of the worst private universities. Our medical system is a bit of a travesty cost-wise, but almost the entirety of our poor and elderly are covered through the state Medicare/Medicaid/SCHIP programs. The ones that really feel it are the middle class who get practically no state help and rely on their employers. We have a functioning welfare system for poor families and the elderly as well, though I fear there are many young people, mothers in particular, that seem perpetually stuck in it.
As for peacekeeping missions abroad that American was involved with that had no direct benefit for them, I would mention our campaign in Yugoslavia in 1999 to prevent the further genocide of the Albanians by the Serbs. There is also the (small) peacekeeping contingent Reagan sent to Beirut during a civil war in Lebanon that ended in tragedy. It's really hard to cite efforts in which the U.S. would not somehow benefit due to how much we have at stake in the world. Isolationism is impossible for us now, nor should we look to it even if given the chance.
I am pretty sure the raw power of our military has dissuaded more wars than it has started, and we carry that terrible burden so the rest of the western world can sleep relatively easy at night. China is still peaceful for a reason. Though Pax Americana may be waning, it has served as a stabilizing force for sometime.
As for the World War II debate, the war on the eastern front had Germany pressuring Russia for most of the early war effort (though never quite successful). I don't know why you keep using the Battle of Britain as your ace in this -- if Britain was so safe afterwards, America would not have needed to supply them with nearly 30% of their military expenditures over the next several years. Britain military was nearly bankrupt and the threat to them was still very real, and Britain continued to drain resources long after that particular battle ended. Do not confuse Britain's "limit break" with a permanent German defeat in the region. This is kind of irrelevant to the topic, however.
I love my country, despite its flaws. It has nothing to do with it being a superpower (though it certainly doesn't hurt -- I would have hated growing up in Congo). I don't consider it elitism to think that my country is the best (though you may not agree with that, certainly you can understand why I might think it true), because I don't have mean spirits about it. I certainly don't look down on other countries. Well, most of them anyways. I did, however, threaten to move to Canada if Bush was re-elected in 2004. I am glad that was an idle threat since I don't think I could live there for climate reasons. I lived a couple of hours from the border now and it is COLD. But have you never rooted for a home town sports team? It's the same concept, but on a much bigger scale. I will also tell you Iowa is the best state in the United States (harmonic will agree, and everyone else will disagree.) I think your thoughts of nationalism and patriotism are skewed by your ideology. You're a pretty leftist guy. But you don't speak for everyone (nor do I). Why you rate American nationalism with China's and Japan's (read: scary) strikes me as odd, especially when you have countries in the EU that express just as much nationalism, if not more, like France. I know Canada has no shortage of nationalists.
Just ask Blitzen, and he will sing you a song about maple syrup and zippers.
Perhaps the nationalism of pseudo-socialist countries is not quite as terrifying to you as you share that worldview?
Since apparently you have to qualify your posts with some sort of intellectual pedigree, my major is political science with an emphasis in international relations.
The only reason I qualified my post was because I was accused of being a first year poli-sci major, and I wanted to state that I have some credibility so belittling me as opposed to replying to what I'm saying isn't appreciated.
I think about what you wrote and reply in the future. It was a good read.
I think about what you wrote and reply in the future. It was a good read.
Why you rate American nationalism with China's and Japan's (read: scary) strikes me as odd, especially when you have countries in the EU that express just as much nationalism, if not more, like France.
I think you cannot say that. :P I'm not saying that because I'm french (I could be "defending" my country etc. but that's not the point), but because you surely know France by what media show about it. And there is nothing worse than media manipulation. We all here have a deformed vision of other countries.
Well, I've read quickly the topic and I would say that too many people here are taking shortcuts, they have a simply vision of our world. "We helped them..." "We did that" etc. It was not you nor me fighting in these wars. Personnally I'm an anti-nationalist and even, anti-patriotist. We're all human beings (okay okay I know "peace and love" it's old-fashioned); I could have be born (erf I'm sure this sentence is not correct xD) in China, in Africa... It's a chance for us, living in powerful countries, to have the possibility to help people not as lucky as us. And it is a duty too. Just think about universal determinism...
Too bad I don't have the words to express all the things I think about. ><
author=Canuck link=topic=2433.msg44031#msg44031 date=1226743309
The only reason I qualified my post was because I was accused of being a first year poli-sci major, and I wanted to state that I have some credibility so belittling me as opposed to replying to what I'm saying isn't appreciated.
I think about what you wrote and reply in the future. It was a good read.
Sorry, that was another subtle dig at our conferred historian, Blitzen, not you!
author=Ody link=topic=2433.msg44042#msg44042 date=1226753129
I think you cannot say that. :P I'm not saying that because I'm french (I could be "defending" my country etc. but that's not the point), but because you surely know France by what media show about it. And there is nothing worse than media manipulation. We all here have a deformed vision of other countries.
Sure I can say that. While French nationalism is indeed a media stereotype, well, stereotypes exist for a reason -- there is usually some truth to it. Why else would your fellow anti-nationalist frenchmen be up in arms about Sarkozy's new "Ministry of Immigration, Integration, National Identity, and Co-Development", which they have dubbed the "Ministry of Nationalism"? Does the media manipulate french blogs that constantly complain about it as well? Does the media expel french muslim girls from schools because they are wearing an islamic veil? Does the media go to drastic (and often humorous) lengths to prevent the french language from being "bastardized" by foreign loan-words?
That darn media, always reporting on stuff that actually happens.
author=Holbert link=topic=2433.msg44016#msg44016 date=1226736919
I will also tell you Iowa is the best state in the United States (harmonic will agree, and everyone else will disagree.)
This. Although I would include the whole upper midwest, though, since it's all the same cultural group. I have repeatedly seen examples of Iowans acting nobly or humbly when others do not. The way we react to natural disasters is the easiest example. Instead of a Katrina-like "federal government has to solve all my problems in life" mentality, we tend to just come together on a grass roots level and help each other out. This year was a nasty year for natural disasters. An entire town was leveled by a tornado, and we had major flooding all over the state. There is never a shortage of volunteers to help sandbag, or donate.
Also, unless you live in some of the dilapidated rural towns, or the bad parts of Des Moines, Waterloo, or Davenport, there is no better place to raise a family.
The bad part is that we have an incompetent state legislature, and the Des Moines school board is the most ugly, bureaucratic, sprawling morass of corruption and idiocy on the planet.
author=harmonic link=topic=2433.msg44065#msg44065 date=1226764140
This. Although I would include the whole upper midwest, though, since it's all the same cultural group. I have repeatedly seen examples of Iowans acting nobly or humbly when others do not. The way we react to natural disasters is the easiest example. Instead of a Katrina-like "federal government has to solve all my problems in life" mentality, we tend to just come together on a grass roots level and help each other out. This year was a nasty year for natural disasters. An entire town was leveled by a tornado, and we had major flooding all over the state. There is never a shortage of volunteers to help sandbag, or donate.
I would contend that you would find people like this, more or less, across the United States. People often, in the face of tragedy, step up to the plate; and it's not limited to one region.
ZOMG PARSONEL AD HOMENEMZ ATATTCK!!!!11111oneone





















