BEST GAME YOU PERSONALLY DON'T LIKE.
Posts
Chrono Trigger
Is Chrono Trigger the new Final Fantasy 7? Maybe it's cool to hate it, now that the DS re-release gave it some exposure. Prior to this thread, I've never read about anyone actually not liking it. I had always thought it was one of the only classic RPGs with truly universal appeal.
I don't like the Call of Duty series. I remember renting COD4 because there was so much hype around it . . . it kind of struck me as a current generation Doom clone in the truest sense. It felt so hollow and arcadey or something? But, it's the most popular shooter ever made, so I don't know what my problem is. I like the genre well enough.
What's great about your post is where you first allege (without actually saying it) that people who don't like Chrono Trigger are somehow "making it up" so that they seem edgy or cool or whatever, and then prove this with the fact that it got re-released on the DS, as if that somehow makes it more popular and talked about now. By "great" I meant stupid of course because your argument is something only a moron would come up with, since Chrono Trigger was discussed way more when it first came out and when people still actually played the game, meaning that people would have had more opportunities back then to contrive their hatred for the game. I also love how you didn't even respond to my post where I pretty definitively showed that Chrono Trigger is a sucky game.
The reason people criticize hideously overrated games like Chrono Trigger or FF7 long after their release is because sometimes it's hard to realize that a game sucks when a) you were 10 when the game was made and b) when everyone around you thinks that the game is the hottest shit since sliced bread.
in short, pwnpwnpwnpwn
The reason people criticize hideously overrated games like Chrono Trigger or FF7 long after their release is because sometimes it's hard to realize that a game sucks when a) you were 10 when the game was made and b) when everyone around you thinks that the game is the hottest shit since sliced bread.
in short, pwnpwnpwnpwn
post=92765It's always hilarious when people defend their opinions as if they're under attack by subtext that they're imagining.
in short, flameflameflameflame
No one's going to shun you from society for not liking a 16-bit era RPG.
post=92766post=92765It's always hilarious when people defend their opinions as if they're under attack by subtext that they're imagining.
in short, flameflameflameflame
No one's going to shun you from society for not liking a 16-bit era RPG.
speaking of imaginary subtext.
That subtext is very real.
I will not further engage in a pissing match, since it's so very obvious that's what you're looking for.
I will not further engage in a pissing match, since it's so very obvious that's what you're looking for.
post=92241
opening chests in the year 600 doesn't ruin them for the year 1000 - even if I'm wrong about that, my point is that there aren't enough consequences in the future for the things you do while you're in the past.
Your opinions and the points you bring up are very valid, and I realize I'm quoting this a bit late in the thread, but I feel a quote from Doctor Who would be relevant here-
- to shed a little light on Chrono Trigger's dealings with paradoxes. It can be assumed that the Epoch is a working Paradox Machine, a machine capable of maintaining a paradox, seen in Doctor Who when humanity's descendants from the end of time kill their own ancestors after going back in time to rule the universe, etc. The same think could apply in Chrono Trigger- making changes in one time period that don't affect any time period other than the one you want to be changed.
Keep in mind- I'm not trying to start/perpetuate a flame war on this subject, but simply imposing conjecture about the point brought up before.
On topic stuff:
FINAL FANTASY 7
World of Warcraft
Guitar Hero
Final Fantasy 2
Final Fantasy 3
post=93062I hope you mean IV. II isn't popular.
Final Fantasy 2
post=93063post=93062I hope you mean IV. II isn't popular.
Final Fantasy 2
No no, I mean 2. Applicable to this thread because it's in the FINAL FANTASY series. That series carries with it the assumption that anything with the FF name plastered on it is going to be good. FFII... Wasn't.
FFIV, on the other hand, is a fantastic game.
I'm pretty sure more people hate FF2 than like it. People who enjoy the SaGa games like it, and they are few and far between. Or however that goes.
Hm. Most people I've talked to hate FFII.
:(
post=93071I'm... nobody...?
Yeah nobody really liked FFII.
:(
Let's see...
Metroid
The Legend of Zelda
Final Fantasy VII
World of Warcraft
Super Castlevania IV
Super Mario Galaxy
The entire Street Fighter series
Warcraft 3
Counter Strike
That's all I can think of at the moment.
Metroid
The Legend of Zelda
Final Fantasy VII
World of Warcraft
Super Castlevania IV
Super Mario Galaxy
The entire Street Fighter series
Warcraft 3
Counter Strike
That's all I can think of at the moment.
- to shed a little light on Chrono Trigger's dealings with paradoxes. It can be assumed that the Epoch is a working Paradox Machine, a machine capable of maintaining a paradox, seen in Doctor Who when humanity's descendants from the end of time kill their own ancestors after going back in time to rule the universe, etc. The same think could apply in Chrono Trigger- making changes in one time period that don't affect any time period other than the one you want to be changed.
Then why are you able to affect the future sometimes, like with all the trees in the years 600/1000?




















