Sex 'n' Sin, Sax 'n' Violins Topic

Orig

44

10/26/2009 02:53 AM

That's prolly a better way to say it, yeah.

Drakonais

2787

10/26/2009 03:10 AM

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wilt_Chamberlain

tardis

is it too late for ironhide facepalm

308

10/26/2009 03:11 AM

post=103847
You can love more than one person in a lifetime.

Thank you for saying this. :/
'Bout time.

Mitsuhide_The_Vagrant

1413

11/14/2009 06:38 PM

post=103806
...I don't think sex is something that should be taken lightly.

This.

Although, I have been in the situation where I just wanted to do it just because it's fun and stuff (in fact, I've been able to restrain from doing with someone I know when I had a complete, genuine opportunity).

My opinion? Sex should not be taken lightly. You should only have sex with someone you care about; if sex changes your relationship with that person drastically, then maybe it was a mistake. I'm not sure, I can only speak for myself here...

However, we are still animals and we all still have animalistic urges, some that make us more like the wild animals we, as intelligence rational creatures, should strive to rise above. Mindless, emotionless sex is one of them. Sex is sacred; don't have it with some random person you barely know, or at least you barely give a shit about.

post=103847
You can love more than one person in a lifetime.

Completely true. Which means I'm also saying it's not a bad thing to have sex with someone you won't marry or be with for the rest of your life. Like I said up^ there.

And there's my 2 cents...

Blitzen

3253

11/15/2009 01:30 AM

If the natural end result of sex is pregnancy and thus children, naturally you shouldn't be having sex with someone who you wouldn't want to be the parent of your child. Ipsofacto meter self appropriately.

Feldschlacht IV