Full Games List
Featured Games
New Games
Reviews
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Images Feedback Summary
Game Design Highlights
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engines
Engine Bulletins
What is Makerscore?
Past Events
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Post History
Chat
New to RMN?
Full Store List
RMN Music Pack (free)
PROBLEMS WITH SITE LOADING PROPERLY
Posts
skylin05
9
skylin05
View playlists
CloseI'm not sure if this is the right place for this topic, but on the left-hand column where avatars and usernames would be there is just an empty white space.
When I go to my profile or manage games, screenshots, etc. everything runs together making a jumbled mess that's hard to navigate.
When I go to my profile or manage games, screenshots, etc. everything runs together making a jumbled mess that's hard to navigate.
skylin05
9
I'm using IE.
No, it has never worked. Since I've only logged on 3 times that's not much to work with though.
No, it has never worked. Since I've only logged on 3 times that's not much to work with though.
Ravenite1
243
Download Mozilla Firefox, it's way better than internet explorer IMO.
However if you still want to use your IE I would suggest updating it to the latest version.... at least do that.
However if you still want to use your IE I would suggest updating it to the latest version.... at least do that.
you're not in compatibility mode without noticing, are you? ftr the latest stable version of IE is 8
WolfCoder
3554
I like Firefox too, it's a good standard web browser. It's what I personally use pretty much almost all the time, but I also love Opera. Chrome is OK. I really only want to use Chrome on linux because for some reason the Firefox implementation on linux is really slow. Compare this to Windows 7 and this netbook running Firefox smoothly and quickly.
Anything but IE, really.
Anything but IE, really.
It's probably because you're running on compatibility mode.
But RMN always looks ugly on IE. I gave up and downloaded google chrome.
But RMN always looks ugly on IE. I gave up and downloaded google chrome.
I use firefox mostly, but i have always used IE for RMN. I have no idea why...
But yeah, my IE works fine. Update it i guess.
But yeah, my IE works fine. Update it i guess.
I'd suggest Firefox, Opera, IE8, or Chromium. I'd personally stay the hell away from Google Chrome because it bundles Google Update.
author=geodudeI probably won't use Chrome until they fix the last tab closing bug, but its a decent browser. Personally, though, I use opera.
firefox is so 00s. it's all about chrome B)
I use firefox because I am an old man who hates change. Having tried Chrome, this is what I think of it:
author=KingArthurthe google pack updater? it doesn't.
I'd personally stay the hell away from Google Chrome because it bundles Google Update.
p.s. what bug?
The way I see it, Firefox has the clear upper hand against all other browsers in terms of RAM usage (lowest overall RAM usage per tab/webpage) but is somewhat slow in executing things like JavaScript and Flash.
Chromium (and consequently Google Chrome), on the other hand, is blazing fast with JavaScript and Flash (drawing a close tie with Opera?) but has no reservations about using up RAM like a fat hog (primarily because of its design). Though that high RAM usage brings with it increased stability, I guess.
EDIT:
Chromium (and consequently Google Chrome), on the other hand, is blazing fast with JavaScript and Flash (drawing a close tie with Opera?) but has no reservations about using up RAM like a fat hog (primarily because of its design). Though that high RAM usage brings with it increased stability, I guess.
EDIT:
the google pack updater? it doesn't.It had bundled Google Update last time I downloaded and installed Google Chrome. Admittedly, I'm not sure if they changed that as it's been a while; nowadays I just grab and use the latest build of Chromium if I want to use Chrome for stuff like Flash games.
author=KingArthur
The way I see it, Firefox has the clear upper hand against all other browsers in terms of RAM usage (lowest overall RAM usage per tab/webpage) but is somewhat slow in executing things like JavaScript and Flash.
Chromium (and consequently Google Chrome), on the other hand, is blazing fast with JavaScript and Flash (drawing a close tie with Opera?) but has no reservations about using up RAM like a fat hog (primarily because of its design). Though that high RAM usage brings with it increased stability, I guess.
I just tested both browsers and they both seem to use exactly the same amount of RAM.
eplipswich
2728
author=Yellow Magicauthor=KingArthurI just tested both browsers and they both seem to use exactly the same amount of RAM.
The way I see it, Firefox has the clear upper hand against all other browsers in terms of RAM usage (lowest overall RAM usage per tab/webpage) but is somewhat slow in executing things like JavaScript and Flash.
Chromium (and consequently Google Chrome), on the other hand, is blazing fast with JavaScript and Flash (drawing a close tie with Opera?) but has no reservations about using up RAM like a fat hog (primarily because of its design). Though that high RAM usage brings with it increased stability, I guess.
http://dotnetperls.com/chrome-memory
Overall, under final memory, chrome and firefox are about the same, but under maximum and average memory, one will see that chrome is about 4 times larger than firefox.
Which surprises me because i tend to lag more when I use Firefox than when I use Chrome (using a com with 1GB of RAM)(while opening browsers that is).
