RMN4 IS HERE!
Posts
"Whoa!"
*edit: I agree with Deacon, I actually never browse the forums. I only ever really posted on stuff that was on the front page :/ oh well, at least we have random images again!!! YES!!
*edit: I agree with Deacon, I actually never browse the forums. I only ever really posted on stuff that was on the front page :/ oh well, at least we have random images again!!! YES!!
It's a little bit strange at first. But I think we will get used to it.
The only thing I'm missing is the latest forum posts on the main page...
The only thing I'm missing is the latest forum posts on the main page...
Yes! random screenshots!
EDIT: I got 10 more MB of locker space?
EDIT: I got 10 more MB of locker space?
author=Felipe_9595
tehre is no way to choose the old Skin of the forums :c????
Um, I highly doubt it. So, no. We all have what is seen.
I like how it is going, but it is cluttered, and it takes a small but of time (time, no matter how little it is nonetheless, that COULD be used browsing games and the forums much faster) to load up the buttons and topics and such. It was much faster and less of a hassle on the older version. Probably should have better balanced this version with the previous version instead of just throwing things together, up on here.
I still like it, as it is fresh and new(er), but it still needs quite a bit of work.
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
WOOOO
So the "gem" slot on the front page is a hidden gem I guess, but I'm not exactly sure what the criteria is for that. Then again, I shouldn't have to worry about it, as nothing I'll make would ever appear there.
author=alteregoi don't really understand this...
Also, about the logo. I think it's nice you brought back that diamond-like thingy. But when it comes to logo design, the phrase "less is more" holds much more meaning that under any other context. And this is more like a regression. Instead of subtracting you've added a huge, nasty blot to what it was an already perfect logo. ;_;
Oh, well~
author=Felipe_9595Nope.
tehre is no way to choose the old Skin of the forums :c????
author=Khos
Yes! random screenshots!
EDIT: I got 10 more MB of locker space?
Yeah, don't tell holb I bumped up the minimum lockerspace.
author=ldida1That was my fault. I used the wrong color in the CSS.
I liek.
But yeah, the text below the reviews is VERY hard to read.
author=Thiamorauthor=Felipe_9595Um, I highly doubt it. So, no. We all have what is seen.
tehre is no way to choose the old Skin of the forums :c????
I like how it is going, but it is cluttered, and it takes a small but of time (time, no matter how little it is nonetheless, that COULD be used browsing games and the forums much faster) to load up the buttons and topics and such. It was much faster and less of a hassle on the older version. Probably should have better balanced this version with the previous version instead of just throwing things together, up on here.
I still like it, as it is fresh and new(er), but it still needs quite a bit of work.
Then get to work.
(You act like we didn't give this any thought. There was no realistic way to stress test the dev server, since it is an old PC sitting on ankylo's desk. We were concerned that performance might become an issue, but we had no way to accurately judge how much and where it would be an issue.
And quickly you guys forgot the shoddy layout and lists of RMN3. You were just used to it.
Now, I have a better understanding where things are slowing down, and I can take steps to address them.)
author=Marrend
So the "gem" slot on the front page is a hidden gem I guess, but I'm not exactly sure what the criteria is for that.Then again, I shouldn't have to worry about it, as nothing I'll make would ever appear there.
Yes, it is a Hidden Gem. I will be making a new forum topic about that section soon.
author=SolitayreWelcome to the world where reviews are worth more.
Hello 6000 makerscore how are you?
author=benosHow so? and which version of IE? and did you clear your cache?
On IE, the webpage looks wacked out. And on firefox as well, could use more improvement.
























