Full Games List
Featured Games
New Games
Reviews
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Images Feedback Summary
Game Design Highlights
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engines
Engine Bulletins
What is Makerscore?
Past Events
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Post History
Chat
New to RMN?
Full Store List
RMN Music Pack (free)
FUNNY PICTURE THREAD
Posts
Melkino
View playlists
Close
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
I must be kinda slow because I don't see anything strange or funny in the unemployment rate one. Is there a blooper there somewhere?
Funny how 8.6% in their graph is equal to 9.0% and higher than their 8.8%.
Funny in the "Laugh and pull out the vodka and keep drinking until the pain stops" kind of way.
Funny in the "Laugh and pull out the vodka and keep drinking until the pain stops" kind of way.
Cozzer
0
author=LockeZ
I must be kinda slow because I don't see anything strange or funny in the unemployment rate one. Is there a blooper there somewhere?
"Have you seen the unemployment rate? It was 8.8, but Obama made it grow into 8.6! THAT'S WAY HIGHER!"
(Still, the rest of the graph seems alright, so they probably got the number wrong and it was supposed to be 9.0)
Uh, no.
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/story/2011-12-02/unemployment-rate-november/51577788/1
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/us-unemployment-rate-falls-to-86percent-in-nov-120k-jobs-added/2011/12/02/gIQAFKZeKO_story.html
Bad graphs like that is common in propaganda. The numbers will check out and based on reputable sources but the analysis will always be off. The backpedal if called out on is "Oops our bad!" (see Obama as Romney and 22% > 23%) without repercussion but people who just glance over it without checking the numbers in their head will be bought over or influenced by it towards the propaganda's bias.
http://www.tradingeconomics.com/united-states/unemployment-rate
http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/story/2011-12-02/unemployment-rate-november/51577788/1
http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm
http://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/us-unemployment-rate-falls-to-86percent-in-nov-120k-jobs-added/2011/12/02/gIQAFKZeKO_story.html
Bad graphs like that is common in propaganda. The numbers will check out and based on reputable sources but the analysis will always be off. The backpedal if called out on is "Oops our bad!" (see Obama as Romney and 22% > 23%) without repercussion but people who just glance over it without checking the numbers in their head will be bought over or influenced by it towards the propaganda's bias.
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
author=Cozzerauthor=LockeZ"Have you seen the unemployment rate? It was 8.8, but Obama made it grow into 8.6! THAT'S WAY HIGHER!"
I must be kinda slow because I don't see anything strange or funny in the unemployment rate one. Is there a blooper there somewhere?
(Still, the rest of the graph seems alright, so they probably got the number wrong and it was supposed to be 9.0)
At the time, November wasn't over yet, so I assumed that because the numbers weren't finalized they didn't want to let them skew the graph, but they still posted the number-to-date for the curious. This is likely a feature of whatever graphing software they use. It is not necessarily an incorrect way of presenting the data, though it's slightly disconcerting for a split second until you realize why it's drawn that way.
Or maybe it really was just a typo. I dunno.
ANYWAY, PICS:
TheNecromancer
3160
author=Craze
HAHA The first time I saw Ryker he was wearing the beard. I think he looks silly without it
I've been watching this like 10 (or almost) times, this is perfect, everything! LOL
Edit : who are these people, btw?
Edit : who are these people, btw?
