New account registration is temporarily disabled.

WE NEED SOME POLITICS. YOUR THOUGHTS?

Posts

WIP
I'm not comfortable with any idea that can't be expressed in the form of men's jewelry
11363
Don't shit in your own back yard.

About sensationalists, I hate them. It's like that whole WATER BOTTLE POISON thing that came out a few weeks ago.

I am also reminded of this video. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4mCDZMWVWuc
You can certainly watch the whole thing, but 2:14 or so is what I'm talking about. The diabetes thing.
author=brandonabley link=topic=974.msg13691#msg13691 date=1209580462
running away with a correlation or two is very bad science.
Please don't tell me you're arguing against the theory that the quickly depletion in the number of pirates has caused global warming!

Anyway, regardless of whether or not there's more oil to be tapped, we need to stop using it anyway. No matter how much there is, it's not going to be enough, especially with China ramping up their usage.

And yeah, Him, my experience with conservatives is in line with Holb's. They think it's more or less impossible for humans to have an impact on the world's environment, and that even if we could it wouldn't matter because it would cost too much money.

...then again, the conservatives I know are Rush Limbaugh fans, and they have actually stated in full honesty that they'd willingly pay more money to do something in a way that counteracted environmentalists' efforts just to spite them since Rush said he would be. Which in all honestly doesn't sound particularly conservative (I would classify that political affiliation as "looney"), but they self-identify as conservative anyway. Speaking of which, I've recently decided that Rush Limbaugh isn't a real person, but a satirical character being played by a liberal, like Stephen Colbert or Archie Bunker. He's too cartoonish to be real.
author=Shadowtext link=topic=974.msg13725#msg13725 date=1209597780
I've recently decided that Rush Limbaugh isn't a real person, but a satirical character being played by a liberal, like Stephen Colbert or Archie Bunker. He's too cartoonish to be real.

Yeah isn't it amazing that his official website focuses on two topics:

1. Politics
2. Cigars
harmonic
It's like toothpicks against a tank
4142
I hope something really bad happens to Rush Limbaugh. The FBI won't let me say WHAT though, specifically. But you get my drift.

He has advocated violence and rioting in Denver as a result of the democrat national convention. He's "dreaming of riots in denver." He wants there to be chaos, destruction of property, and maybe even some deaths as a result of his petty political schemes.
I fear the American Taliban - the ultra conservative religious christian crackpots in the US that wield ungodly amounts of power. They terrify me.

http://adultthought.ucsd.edu/Culture_War/The_American_Taliban.html

Fuck I hate them.
Right wing Christians are pretty out there.
I really find it interesting the words always being used. Moderate. Liberal. Conservative. Progressive. It seems to me in the American realm all the words almost have different meanings, or strict meanings when usually they're abstract words. Moderate of a person of the centre, a liberal is someone left of centre or a social democrat, and a progressive is a left wing person. Is that right? Conservative is used similarly I guess, but again being rightwing and conservative aren't always the same. I suppose it usually is though, depending on the country.

Regardless, all Presidential candidates are right of centre on a global spectrum, and only in the right wing America would Obama seen to be left of centre. Canada's right wing Prime Minister is more left wing than Obama.
C'mon now, Hillary, just give up already...

News Link
At least four superdelegates -- those party insiders who will likely be needed to push him over the top in his contest with rival Hillary Clinton -- jumped to the Obama camp Wednesday.

Meanwhile, Clinton lost one her most important superdelegate supporters -- former presidential nominee George McGovern.

He said he told former President Bill Clinton he was switching his support to Obama. McGovern also urged Hillary Clinton in public to drop out of the race.

Meanwhile, Clinton's bid for the Democratic presidential nomination is on shaky ground as insiders say she won't be able to pick up enough delegates to win. She's also facing a money crunch.
It just seems time to bow out gracefully as she can.
Starscream
Conquest is made from the ashes of one's enemies.
6110
Her campaign also admitted today she had to loan them $6,400,000.00 in the last month to keep them afloat and she also hasn't paid back much of that debt reported in March.

Maybe Bill will make her quit now that she spent all her money and is now tapping in to his speaking fees.
harmonic
It's like toothpicks against a tank
4142
The concept of "quit" is not programmed into Hillary Clinton. She will fight to the bitter end.

She doesn't care about the damage it might cause either, as for her it seems like some sort of personal mission to fulfill her rightful place as the first woman ever to rule the world.

She's 100% doomed unless Obama dies or something. Kind of a sad thing to see, since she's going to get older and greyer while Obama will be in his prime for a long time. If she wasn't such a polarizing, lying, manipulator, I'd have probably opted for Obama to just be the vice president, have them sweep this election, and virtually guarantee Obama's place as president 4 or 8 years after that.

But that's not the case. Hillary would bring more of the same. The same Bush cowboy politics, the same corporate lobbyist-ruled washington.

Barry 08!
I admire her will to fight. I hope she'll be able to pull this off because this is quite a gamble to continue the race. I still think she has a better chance at winning a general election.
author=harmonic link=topic=974.msg15224#msg15224 date=1210201477
The concept of "quit" is not programmed into Hillary Clinton. She will fight to the bitter end.

Dammit, harmonic. How am I supposed to not vote for her now that you've put THIS image in my mind?!



And I liked Obama so much better, too. Oh, well.
I think the Republicans have a very sucky candidate. John McCain is just too... low-brow. I haven't heard much out of him other ZzZz's in all of the pictures they seem to capture of him. Makes him seem like some sleeping old man... Which seems to be like what he is.

And between Obama and Hilary, I seriously like Obama more. Hilary scares the heck out of me. But honestly, I was kind of rooting for Ron Paul, just to see what he'd do differently. A billion people have already pointed out his faults, but some were misplaced/over-hyped.

Meh. I'm in Texas, so it's not like if I voted Obama it would help him out. McCain will probably win Texas since we're a conservative state. I would be surprised if he didn't. Then again, Democrats are making record turn-out when it comes to registering and voting and the like, so we'll see. Obama seems to have a plan though. I need to go renew my voter's registration, whee.
author=Shadowtext link=topic=974.msg15246#msg15246 date=1210205123



I don't get it.
author=brandonabley link=topic=974.msg15287#msg15287 date=1210211573
I don't get it.
It's a reference to Gurren Lagann. I'd explain, but I doubt it'd help you out. The reference is really only amusing if you've seen the source, rather than hearing about it.
harmonic
It's like toothpicks against a tank
4142
author=Terin link=topic=974.msg15261#msg15261 date=1210206635
I think the Republicans have a very sucky candidate. John McCain is just too... low-brow. I haven't heard much out of him other ZzZz's in all of the pictures they seem to capture of him. Makes him seem like some sleeping old man... Which seems to be like what he is.

And between Obama and Hilary, I seriously like Obama more. Hilary scares the heck out of me. But honestly, I was kind of rooting for Ron Paul, just to see what he'd do differently. A billion people have already pointed out his faults, but some were misplaced/over-hyped.

Meh. I'm in Texas, so it's not like if I voted Obama it would help him out. McCain will probably win Texas since we're a conservative state. I would be surprised if he didn't. Then again, Democrats are making record turn-out when it comes to registering and voting and the like, so we'll see. Obama seems to have a plan though. I need to go renew my voter's registration, whee.

Ron Paul needs to be cloned and put in the head position of every single financial committee in washington so he can remind us that our shit does stink every now and then.
author=harmonic link=topic=974.msg15297#msg15297 date=1210213135
author=Terin link=topic=974.msg15261#msg15261 date=1210206635
I think the Republicans have a very sucky candidate. John McCain is just too... low-brow. I haven't heard much out of him other ZzZz's in all of the pictures they seem to capture of him. Makes him seem like some sleeping old man... Which seems to be like what he is.

And between Obama and Hilary, I seriously like Obama more. Hilary scares the heck out of me. But honestly, I was kind of rooting for Ron Paul, just to see what he'd do differently. A billion people have already pointed out his faults, but some were misplaced/over-hyped.

Meh. I'm in Texas, so it's not like if I voted Obama it would help him out. McCain will probably win Texas since we're a conservative state. I would be surprised if he didn't. Then again, Democrats are making record turn-out when it comes to registering and voting and the like, so we'll see. Obama seems to have a plan though. I need to go renew my voter's registration, whee.

Ron Paul needs to be cloned and put in the head position of every single financial committee in washington so he can remind us that our shit does stink every now and then.


I thought our shit smelled like cinnamon, rainbows, butterflies, and freshly-baked cookies...?

But yeah. I did appreciate how forward he could be sometimes. I would've liked to see how he would've run the government.
The only thing worse than Libertarianism is Fascism. It has that beat. Thank God Ron Paul is out.

Clinton may be a better candidate to win because they're so right wing that conservatives will vote for her. I don't think the for the democrats to win is to become more like the republicans.
author=Canuck link=topic=974.msg15387#msg15387 date=1210243472
Clinton may be a better candidate to win because they're so right wing that conservatives will vote for her. I don't think the for the democrats to win is to become more like the republicans.

This might be the case if she didn't demonize Republicans every chance she got (regardless of whether or not they deserve it). Obama actually has had some success among a small number of conservatives and a large number of independents (who tend conservative in many states).

I'd say Obama has a better shot at winning. Early general polls have given him a chance in key southern states like North Carolina, which would be a huge blow to McCain if Obama did indeed win it. He also polls well in some key democratic states that Hillary will most likely lose, like Iowa and Oregon, and has had decent showings in some western states that tend Republican, like Montana and Nevada. If he did indeed pick all these states up, it would negate any damage he would take for not having Florida, which he will not win because Florida is primarily old people.

And Obama won't lose Pennsylvania, no matter how many conservative pundits say otherwise. Losing a state in the primary does not = losing a state in the general, and general polls have Obama in high single-digit leads even before the generals have begun.
harmonic
It's like toothpicks against a tank
4142
author=Karsuman link=topic=974.msg15390#msg15390 date=1210244713
Florida is primarily old people.

This is classic Karsuman <3

Anyway, Obama has a way better chance at beating McCain for this single reason: he doesn't exude a personality that makes ordinary people dislike him like nurse Ratched Hillary does. Republicans who would otherwise just not vote at all hate Hillary enough to vote against her (and not necessarily FOR McCain).