Full Games List
Featured Games
New Games
Reviews
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Images Feedback Summary
Game Design Highlights
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engines
Engine Bulletins
What is Makerscore?
Past Events
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Post History
Chat
New to RMN?
Full Store List
RMN Music Pack (free)
Profile
Locker
Play ListsTHENECROMANCER'S PROFILE
TheNecromancer
3160
Close
RMN sucks
Search
Filter
All
Game Pages
User Statuses
Wither Review
PM Rastek, see if he's willing to fill you in. Be sure to keep it secret, though :P
What he explained to me is much more detailed then what anyone could figure out from the game alone(probably). And really, it's better that he didn't explain everything in-game.
What he explained to me is much more detailed then what anyone could figure out from the game alone(probably). And really, it's better that he didn't explain everything in-game.
Eling Review
The problem is in how you describe your thoughts and experience with the game. Reading this review is pointless because it tells me next to nothing about the game. It sounds like a 10 year old's blog. You only mentioned one fact about the game that couldn't be learned just by reading over the gamepage.
If you insist on writing more reviews, at least talk about the game(minus the analogies). Out of everything you wrote, only this much can be considered agood not shitty review:
The only redeeming factor is that the score seems to closely fit the game. Is that what the site has come down to? Lowering it's standards as long as we get them stars :/ It's sad to see these reviews get accepted.
C'est la vie.
If you insist on writing more reviews, at least talk about the game(minus the analogies). Out of everything you wrote, only this much can be considered a
So I went through this Eling and have quite a few problems with it.
Gameplay:
It's one of those games where you have 3 hits no attack and you walk around avoiding obstacles. Apparently when you first start you must open chests to get money which in turn allows you to by stuff in shop mode.
Story:
So uh, you are DAVE. Who is randomly thinking about the Eling. Not many people know who the Eling or what the Eling is, yet there is a book on it but you cannot find out about them without 15 crystals.
Maps:
Well you got Rtp hero running around avoiding rtp enemies with 3 hit points. Not that it's the problem but I noticed a lot of tiles clash. like, badly. otherwise the mapping is pretty good. The best part of the game.
Overall:
Not too bad except quite a few large flaws
Yeah, so I recommend this game is you just want a simple maze game.
The only redeeming factor is that the score seems to closely fit the game. Is that what the site has come down to? Lowering it's standards as long as we get them stars :/ It's sad to see these reviews get accepted.
C'est la vie.
Eling Review
Wither Review
Well now that Darken added a review, what could you say that hasn't already been said! You waited too long again ;)
EpiQuest Review
Uh..is there going to be a second part to this review? Where you actually justify giving 4 stars? From this review all I know is that this game has so many bugs that it gets it's own category.
You talk about what's good, then contradict yourself by later saying its bad o.O
Good
-It was good that neither enemy nor player just used attack
-I enjoyed the battles where I did think a bit the first time through and buffs and debuffs had actual uses.
Bad
-Fights become rather superficial. Buff, Debuff, Poison, Blind, whatever, hit, damage, hit, use skill when of cooldown, Heal when necessary (you do realize this is how RPG's are supposed to work, right?)
Good
-Skill choices were broad enough and enjoyable
Bad
-Too many skills are exact mirrors of each other but with a different element. This makes the skilltree less expansive than what you go in expecting. Fire and Ice do exactly the same thing except Fire does fire damage and Ice does ice damage.
How does this equal 4 stars??
Plus half the points under BAD are pretty much the same thing. Another stellar review for RMN.
You talk about what's good, then contradict yourself by later saying its bad o.O
Good
-It was good that neither enemy nor player just used attack
-I enjoyed the battles where I did think a bit the first time through and buffs and debuffs had actual uses.
Bad
-Fights become rather superficial. Buff, Debuff, Poison, Blind, whatever, hit, damage, hit, use skill when of cooldown, Heal when necessary (you do realize this is how RPG's are supposed to work, right?)
Good
-Skill choices were broad enough and enjoyable
Bad
-Too many skills are exact mirrors of each other but with a different element. This makes the skilltree less expansive than what you go in expecting. Fire and Ice do exactly the same thing except Fire does fire damage and Ice does ice damage.
How does this equal 4 stars??
Plus half the points under BAD are pretty much the same thing. Another stellar review for RMN.
Hero's Sword Review
@ben - not directed at you
These are all opinions. Just like Ratty has his opinion, you have yours. Your trying too hard to get others to think what you think. He didn't like that game, deal with it. He didn't play it to bash it, he played it to review it and since it's not very good this is the result.
Based on the numbers Ratty described, it does sound like this game is unbalanced. It's not the end of the world. You can either live in a fantasy world where your game is perfect, or you can listen to what others say and improve your games. You released your game for everyone to see, EXPECT negative reviews. Even popular, well-made games with 4 star reviews are hated by many people and get shit on. Strange world we live in.
These are all opinions. Just like Ratty has his opinion, you have yours. Your trying too hard to get others to think what you think. He didn't like that game, deal with it. He didn't play it to bash it, he played it to review it and since it's not very good this is the result.
Based on the numbers Ratty described, it does sound like this game is unbalanced. It's not the end of the world. You can either live in a fantasy world where your game is perfect, or you can listen to what others say and improve your games. You released your game for everyone to see, EXPECT negative reviews. Even popular, well-made games with 4 star reviews are hated by many people and get shit on. Strange world we live in.
Hero's Sword Review
It's an open site, it's to be expected. Otherwise this place would turn into Meridian Dance. No need to get all worked up over kids and their naive opinions. It's true that the response to this review was not "grownup" but flaming won't help. Some people are just overly defensive and not used to this type of environment and criticism, it doesn't make him a troll. He just doesn't know any better.
I think this type of typical angry response from the "more mature" members of the site towards these new guys is more embarrassing. Chill out ppl.
I think this type of typical angry response from the "more mature" members of the site towards these new guys is more embarrassing. Chill out ppl.
Super RMN Bros. Review
This isn't the first and only game to have a high download count that people openly and constantly regard as shit. RMN is a strange parallel universe where anything can happen!
oh really? haha that's pretty cool.
author=kentona
It was featured in the SMBX splash screen for a few months after it's release. Thus EVERYONE who downloaded and used SMBX in that time saw a link for Super RMN Bros.
oh really? haha that's pretty cool.
Super Puzzle World Review
author=Ben_Random
Since this is only a demo review, I have not seen all of the graphics and audio, so I am combining the two categories in this review.
Then why the hell did you even write a review in the first place? I don't follow this game extensively but even I knew that it is almost complete.
Saying that Zelda fans will like this is retarded.
Looking at your other reviews and the comments left on them, I don't know why your are still going on with these abominations. You asked for feedback and there was a resounding "This is terrible"
Please stop writing reviews.
Under World (Land of the Dead) Review
I'm simply disagreeing with this review having so many stars. The game is being presented as a masterpiece when it's a just a mediocre game made a long time ago. It's nothing against the game or the developer but 4.5 is extreme for a game like this if the rating system is taken seriously. If you compare games with a similar score there is a certain level of quality expected in the game. This doesn't stand up to serious 4star games. It's not meant to be a top notch game. It's an early attempt at game making or even a prototype. It seemed to be glitch free, there were some human errors, but the system works so good job with that.
I was browsing the Games section for new games and came across this title. I opened the gamepage, looked at the stats, and read the review; it sounded spectacular! So I download it and start playing...it's a dud. I was deceived by this review so I am sharing my experience. You don't have to agree with me but others might.
I came across the game in passing and I've left my comments. There is no reason to stick around to argue ^.^ I will be interested to see how your newer projects turn out now.
I was browsing the Games section for new games and came across this title. I opened the gamepage, looked at the stats, and read the review; it sounded spectacular! So I download it and start playing...it's a dud. I was deceived by this review so I am sharing my experience. You don't have to agree with me but others might.
I came across the game in passing and I've left my comments. There is no reason to stick around to argue ^.^ I will be interested to see how your newer projects turn out now.
Games - Tester
Games - Other
