MAFIA: DEMON REALM GAME THREAD
Posts
Why the fudgekins would he not open his role PM before playing the game?
So that if he's mafia he won't act mafia at first. Duh!
Like I said, I suspect him too, but I'm trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. It would be easier if he'd speak.
Like I said, I suspect him too, but I'm trying to give him the benefit of the doubt. It would be easier if he'd speak.
author=Yellow Magic
That's interesting; what makes you say that?
Your own answer to Gourd Clae's remark is not much better than Marrend's, imo; neither did you mention the T/P/Is before Gourd did...
#Lynch Yellow Magic
I had a feeling someone would point that out sooner or later; I didn't choose to acknowledge one 'odd mechanic' over another whereas Marrend did. I was merely generating discussion, while it seems like Marrend was trying to avoid a certain direction.
I agree that Marrend or completely avoided or seemed unaware of the fact, which Gourd's idea that he hadn't opened his PM yet could explain.
chana that is a silly defence and you know it. I shouldn't even have to explain why it's silly.
So, chana.
Post histoy:
1) Tells everyone to hurry up and talk, acuses despite and dudesoft of...whatever
2) 'I wanna hear what all have to say! Maybe Despite too?
3) Acuses Yellow Magic of...whatever
4) What?
Post histoy:
1) Tells everyone to hurry up and talk, acuses despite and dudesoft of...whatever
2) 'I wanna hear what all have to say! Maybe Despite too?
3) Acuses Yellow Magic of...whatever
4) What?
Is there a reason you're being so vicious? 3 people in 3 pages brutally voted for by chana! The horror!
No really, what the heck?
@YM I agree, I was just putting it out there.
No really, what the heck?
@YM I agree, I was just putting it out there.
author=Yellow Magic
I had a feeling someone would point that out sooner or later; I didn't choose to acknowledge one 'odd mechanic' over another whereas Marrend did. I was merely generating discussion, while it seems like Marrend was trying to avoid a certain direction.
If we want to find whoever was fishing for information because they have something to hide, you look far more suspicious to me with this
Why? It certainly *is* an odd set of mechanics, after all.
Because you ask why and assert that the mechanics are odd.
Here's the thing though: They aren't. Items are not uncommon in mafia, powers are....in every mafia game. They're just renamed.
The only thing I'm concerned about are the traits. My PM says I don't have any...yet. Which implies that traits can be conferred on players later in the game.
I only put out one vote, the first post about Despite and Dudesoft was more of a joke, and I didn't vote against them.
@Gourd_Clae ^. I also found Yellow Magic's reaction to Marrend's post very suspicious in that she seemed to be describing her own attitude and applying it to Marrend (which's post I agree was certainly odd, unless as you said she hadn't opened her mailbox).
Frankly I am surprised that Dudesoft is not yet six feet under considering how PW mafia ended.
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
If we want to find whoever was fishing for information because they have something to hide, you look far more suspicious to me with this
Why? It certainly *is* an odd set of mechanics, after all.
Because you ask why and assert that the mechanics are odd.
Here's the thing though: They aren't. Items are not uncommon in mafia, powers are....in every mafia game. They're just renamed.
The only thing I'm concerned about are the traits. My PM says I don't have any...yet. Which implies that traits can be conferred on players later in the game.
Here's the thing: I've never played a Mafia game outside RMN before, and as such have never been privy to such a setup.
And again I'm going to point everyone's attention to this sentence:
author=Marrend
One would expect the other way around, considering FF8 and, totally guessing on this one, PW.
Marrend's references for the point he was making were simply the other two Mafia games. So I find it strange that if he's comparing this game to the other two Mafia games we had recently, he wouldn't point out the T/P/I setup.
author=chanaI said acused, not voted.
I only put out one vote, the first post about Despite and Dudesoft was more of a joke, and I didn't vote against them.
It didn't look like a joke to me.
*FIXED GRAMMAR*
...apologies for using the word 'privy', and incorrectly at that. I mean I have never seen a setup like this before.
and yeah, Chana, if that doubly-random voting was a joke, it wasn't a very good one...
author=Yellow Magic
Marrend's references for the point he was making were simply the other two Mafia games. So I find it strange that if he's comparing this game to the other two Mafia games we had recently, he wouldn't point out the T/P/I setup.
But these are not "odd" mechanics. They are "renamed" mechanics. And as has been pointed out, you are essentially trying to lynch Marrend for the same thing you did. I'm getting the same feeling I had in PW mafia...that you are making a dishonest mistake rather than an honest one.
Hang on, Chana didn't vote twice?
author=Yellow Magic
Hang on, Chana didn't vote twice?
We covered this already?
I said accused not vote in the original post where I said "whatever" twice.
CAVE, I'll concede that Powers are just..powers, but even you just pointed out that the traits were unusual. Both Marrend and I (I am GUESSING) found it strange to see Items in mafia games. And I've already addressed the issue of my own post:
I didn't choose to acknowledge one 'odd mechanic' over another whereas Marrend did. I was merely generating discussion, while it seems like Marrend was trying to avoid a certain direction.

















