Full Games List
Featured Games
New Games
Reviews
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Images Feedback Summary
Game Design Highlights
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engines
Engine Bulletins
What is Makerscore?
Past Events
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Post History
Chat
New to RMN?
Full Store List
RMN Music Pack (free)
NOMIC (MAIN GAME TOPIC, NEW RULESET FOR EASIER PLAY)
Posts
Adon237
View playlists
CloseWhatever then, the rule does not pass.
Yeah, there should be a goal we all have to accomplish, I thought we were actually trying to make it more difficult for others to play.
Yeah, there should be a goal we all have to accomplish, I thought we were actually trying to make it more difficult for others to play.
Alrighty then, CyberDagger's turn.
Not that I'm here to tell you how to play or anything, guys, but right now rule 7 doesn't really do anything. How can you change that...? ;)
Not that I'm here to tell you how to play or anything, guys, but right now rule 7 doesn't really do anything. How can you change that...? ;)
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
author=Fugue
are votes submitted by pm or not?
I sent my vote via PM too, I thought it was in the rules, no?
Shinan
4314
Well if that is the case then I would love a rules proposal where pm voting is optional! (because I can never be bothered to send PMs to anyone :)
There were enough nays sent that it wouldn't have been possible to pass the proposal. And yes, according to the current rules you have to PM your vote (but you can change that).
Cyber's proposal for rule #8:
"Whenever a player's rule proposal is accepted, that player gains 10 points."
Additional information:
"Simple enough. I should point out, as someone might not fully understand this, that if this rule is accepted, I don't get 10 points, as the rule was proposed before its implementation. And there's no use for these points yet, they'll only be a victory condition if someone makes them so."
Cyber's proposal for rule #8:
"Whenever a player's rule proposal is accepted, that player gains 10 points."
Additional information:
"Simple enough. I should point out, as someone might not fully understand this, that if this rule is accepted, I don't get 10 points, as the rule was proposed before its implementation. And there's no use for these points yet, they'll only be a victory condition if someone makes them so."
Points systems need to be more complex, and it'll take some time to add it one by one with new rules, so I believe we should add more to this rule.
My proposition: if rule proposal is declined - user losts 4 (arguable number) points.
Also, if someone adds something to rule and it's accepted with his changes - he gets 2 points as well (again, it doesnt concern my changes here, because it'll be in action after this turn).
My proposition: if rule proposal is declined - user losts 4 (arguable number) points.
Also, if someone adds something to rule and it's accepted with his changes - he gets 2 points as well (again, it doesnt concern my changes here, because it'll be in action after this turn).
CyberDagger
10
I'm actually planning something bigger for these points. I just can't just put al of it in the game with just one rule. I have to keep going at it. I figured the first step would be a way to gather them, and since the only action we can take so far is making rules...
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
I voted yeah on cyberdagger's propsal and nay on mirror's amendment. I dunno, deliberately voting against proposals of a certain person to make him lose points doesn´t sound like my cup of tea.
You can deliberately voting against proposals of a certain person to prevent him from gaining points. Not a big difference, really.
Well this will be like AoC all over again, we will not be able to pass any proposals ever unless they are pretty much pointless. (probably not true)
I like the subtraction of points for a failure to pass a proposal, but a large gain would also be amazing, so REVOKED
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
Wait, wouldn´t it be better if we first voted on cyberdagger's proposal, and if that fails, look at possible amendments? That would make more sense.
You can say whether you would support the proposal as-is, but please don't PM official votes to me until the person who made the proposal says the proposal is in its final form.
CyberDagger
10
Mirror's sugestion seems more like a separate rule to me, and I'd be totally okay if that were his proposal when his turn comes.
My proposal is final. Vote away.
My proposal is final. Vote away.
