[MAFIA] PURGATORY: A MAFIA GAME
Posts
I still prefer Gourd. I don't think Cap_H is trying to *suggest* people vote for you without voting himself, as you imply, because he's been casting votes for you throughout the game. I noticed he isn't waffling as much as he was last game, where he was scum, and his voice here seems overall dissimilar from that game.
https://rpgmaker.net/forums/topics/23773/?post=850503#post850503 his (incorrect) setup spec early game felt honest to me
https://rpgmaker.net/forums/topics/23773/?post=850503#post850503 his (incorrect) setup spec early game felt honest to me
author=Cap_Hauthor=MuffleYeah, but she looks like she's afraid to post.
aneko has also never played before, by the way.
I would say wolves are in: Demonlord, Aneko, LockeZ and maybe Cave, Jero.
i would like an explanation for this though. demonlord has been pushing aneko all game but saying huni is town.
i have my own theory on one of these two players, but would like to hear his explanation.
author=psy_wombats
(unless cave is scum)
that's what I was suggesting, yeah. I could believe the wording was poor though considering it was super late when I went on my posting frenzy.
Oh and something I forgot to point out but seems to have continued and bugs me:
author=psy_wombats
Possibly because some town from last game has a sense of justice.
is this not the weirdest theory in the world or am I losing it?
author=psy_wombats
Gourd is I think the most likely one to kill Jeroen for poetic justice though, for what it's worth, followed by Cave then distantly LockeZ but I don't think so. Starting to actually think that's the real reason.
And then psy keeps talking about it and trying to cast suspicion on people who fit this narrative that kinda came out of nowhere.
author=psy_wombats
Also, if Cave is alive tomorrow that should town-confirm anyone with a sense of humor because it'd be way too funny to kill him.
while I'm looking back, this also feels like a wink from scum. It's like psy knows cave will be alive tomorrow and he's lamsphading this fact.
This reads to me like a scummy player lampshading the fact that if cave wasn't lynched yesterday he would be read as town. And since my other read is cave at this point, I don't like how psy actively diverted lynches from cave near the end and also never ever voted for cave.
Okay I have more to say, but I have to go somewhere. be back soon!
I might as well leave on the cursory observation that psy and cave are now voting in tandem for... some reason
I might as well leave on the cursory observation that psy and cave are now voting in tandem for... some reason
did somebody order a M E G A post
The first half is me defending myself the second half is me casting shade have fun reading! the audio book comes out next month!!
First, noting the irony of cave trying to use lockeZ's earlier question as a scumtell despite trashing it earlier (in the same post even lol)
Second, I was not obligated to answer the question so why would I feel... obligated... to answer the question
The rest of the analysis on my answer is kinda bogus bc idk that it even matter but
It doesn't. you cut out the part where I say "anyway" in my answer here which implies that the outcome seems to be the same if cap can talk or not.
I primarily saw silencing people in this game as a bad thing so I chose who I thought would have the least affect on the game. cap's confusing so it doesn't matter if he can talk. when he's not conusing, people ignore him so it doesn't matter if he can talk. He bandwagons, so in the end, does it matter if he can talk if he just ends up doing what everyone else does.
My analysis of cap vould very well be wrong (I think he's a very good player regardless of these flaws which are mostly due to other players) but my reasoning was fine in retrospect
Okay moving on I talked about that too much and it doesn't even matter
er how. the entire post is me going "I have no clue and this is why he must DIE!!"
throughout the argument with muffle I argue about how we can use your lynch to scumhunt + I scumhunted earlier today at this point so I guess I don't have to engage with this argument? I kinda felt like this day 1 situation was scumhunting though. I was sure that if you didn't die on day 1 that there was probably something rotten and I wanted to see who was opposed to it and why.
I didn't vote for demon because I thought you were a better lynch for reasons I already stated above^^^ Basically, I thought we'd get more info from you than from him and I didn't feel that strongly about his scumminess anyway. I just admitted you had a point.
I mean, at what point? Initially I was defending him bc his posts felt like they were being misread. Then, I was able to see where you guys were coming from later. Even then, I don't think I ever suggested we should lynch him. I probably would've argued against it if I was alive at the end of the day.
there'd be no point in lying - at one point I *did* defend him. psy's argument falls apart because I didn't defend him throughout the entirety of the day. not bc "I didn't defend him at all"
you're gonna have to explain this one. All i see is the post where I changed my mind. As far as I know, this isn't scummy behavior
there don't have to 6 people on scumteam there just has to be you and one person diverting the votes (hi psy!).
which... part?? a lot of it is my answer to lockez's question that doesn't mean anything (which he seems to agree with me on).
the post where he says I was implying I knew how he would flip doesn't imply that at all as far as I can tell?
he also has a dislike that I had a nulltell for him on day 1 but only bc he thinks I was using it to avoid scumhunting. I argued earlier that is is *how* I was scumhunting.
I have a pretty strong feeling you and him are the scum team and now that I can live even after my death I can squawk about it until the end of time. XD I'm scumhunting you two today if this makes cave feel better!
The first half is me defending myself the second half is me casting shade have fun reading! the audio book comes out next month!!
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
i actually don't like this answer to lockez' weird question.
"I wouldn't want Cap to keep talking after death because:
he confuses me (ok)
people ignore him (then why does it matter if he goes silent or not)
he's a big bandwagoner (i can't recall bandwagoning tendencies from cap.)"
feels like, 'I have to think up an answer to this bogus question that will sound credible!!'
First, noting the irony of cave trying to use lockeZ's earlier question as a scumtell despite trashing it earlier (in the same post even lol)
Second, I was not obligated to answer the question so why would I feel... obligated... to answer the question
The rest of the analysis on my answer is kinda bogus bc idk that it even matter but
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
people ignore him (then why does it matter if he goes silent or not)
It doesn't. you cut out the part where I say "anyway" in my answer here which implies that the outcome seems to be the same if cap can talk or not.
I primarily saw silencing people in this game as a bad thing so I chose who I thought would have the least affect on the game. cap's confusing so it doesn't matter if he can talk. when he's not conusing, people ignore him so it doesn't matter if he can talk. He bandwagons, so in the end, does it matter if he can talk if he just ends up doing what everyone else does.
My analysis of cap vould very well be wrong (I think he's a very good player regardless of these flaws which are mostly due to other players) but my reasoning was fine in retrospect
Okay moving on I talked about that too much and it doesn't even matter
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
the beginning of the post also implies that he knows how i will flip
https://rpgmaker.net/forums/topics/23773/?post=850625#post850625
er how. the entire post is me going "I have no clue and this is why he must DIE!!"
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
"im voting cave cause i have a null tell on him" i dont like this attempt to excuse himself from scumhunting from gourd in retrospect, especially since this is where he keeps his vote for the entire day. It's especially bad to me because he had already said that he thought demonlord's arguments sounded scummy at this point in time. What gourd has posted that has actually been game-related seems incoherent. #lynch gourd
throughout the argument with muffle I argue about how we can use your lynch to scumhunt + I scumhunted earlier today at this point so I guess I don't have to engage with this argument? I kinda felt like this day 1 situation was scumhunting though. I was sure that if you didn't die on day 1 that there was probably something rotten and I wanted to see who was opposed to it and why.
I didn't vote for demon because I thought you were a better lynch for reasons I already stated above^^^ Basically, I thought we'd get more info from you than from him and I didn't feel that strongly about his scumminess anyway. I just admitted you had a point.
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACKauthor=Gourd_Claeshouldn't your response to this be, "I wasn't defending demon at all."author=psy_wombatsOkay, but also, we shouldn't have lynched demon. I'm gonna ahve to look back and see exactly how that happened over lynching cave anyway. there's plenty we can learn from it because there's no way scum was not trying to kill demon. Scum was definitely voting to lynch him by the end of the day.
@demon: The point of scum-Gourd defending you (or of scum-Cap defending you) would be to get towncred when you were confirmed. Like Ozzy jumping in last game yelling I TOLD YOU SO.
I mean, at what point? Initially I was defending him bc his posts felt like they were being misread. Then, I was able to see where you guys were coming from later. Even then, I don't think I ever suggested we should lynch him. I probably would've argued against it if I was alive at the end of the day.
there'd be no point in lying - at one point I *did* defend him. psy's argument falls apart because I didn't defend him throughout the entirety of the day. not bc "I didn't defend him at all"
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACKauthor=Gourd_Claeauthor=demonlord5000ah, nevermind me sticking up for demon - I thought he had been laying out narratives for if cave was town AND if cave was scum and then he ended it with the phrase "regardless of alignment".
Cave does antics in every game he plays from what I've seen, regardless of alignment. He's a risk taker, and it seems like the kind of risk he would take as scum.
I looked back and he only made a narrative for cave being scum, on the basis that cave was acting like a townie. Gotcha, that argument actually does read as scummy.
this is exactly what ozzy did 1 game ago
you're gonna have to explain this one. All i see is the post where I changed my mind. As far as I know, this isn't scummy behavior
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
add his argument of "I wasn't lynched day 1, therefore i am scum" argument to the pile, not logically sound considering there aren't 6 people on the scumteam.
there don't have to 6 people on scumteam there just has to be you and one person diverting the votes (hi psy!).
author=psy_wombats
#cancel#lynch Gourd_Clae
cave's reasoning is valid
which... part?? a lot of it is my answer to lockez's question that doesn't mean anything (which he seems to agree with me on).
the post where he says I was implying I knew how he would flip doesn't imply that at all as far as I can tell?
he also has a dislike that I had a nulltell for him on day 1 but only bc he thinks I was using it to avoid scumhunting. I argued earlier that is is *how* I was scumhunting.
I have a pretty strong feeling you and him are the scum team and now that I can live even after my death I can squawk about it until the end of time. XD I'm scumhunting you two today if this makes cave feel better!
and #Lynch Cave for... all of that^ I'd also vote for psy if we were feeling that. I feel a lot stronger about psy being scum bc he's said weird stuff. I'm pretty much on cave's case bc he didn't die day 1 like he was supposed to and it seems like a gambit. cave also made an argument on me that seems really really bogus although, bc it was made on me, I'm afraid I might not be completely objective about it. psy hasn't really argued against me he pretty much just agreed with cave and left it there which seems sketch af so I feel like he might be my better argument, objectively.
They're both colluding pretty heavily today though so the connection seems obvious. would kill either
They're both colluding pretty heavily today though so the connection seems obvious. would kill either
the mentioning of some post-last-game justice justice from psy is weird but it's a really small part of his posts and the rest of his content looks fine to me.
actually in that post I said I leaned town on lockez and said that I initially thought the question may have had scummy motivations. since time moves forward linearly, i no longer think that. if scum you would feel obligated to answer because it is a question directly pointed towards you, in a game thread that you are playing in, and you did not express that you thought it was a bogus question (that was my opinion)
because i'm not talking about that link. I'm talking about the one directly above it.
the context of this was quoting me talking about confirming myself as town. I guess this COULD be ambiguous..but usually people dont talk about dead scum, as, 'confirmed.'
no you didn't scumhunt earlier today. every single one of your posts in this day phase has been about me, and your theory that you apparently determined *day 1* that, if I wasn't lynched day 1, then I must be scum. oh and picking up 1 thing said by psy, the other person voting you. this is the opposite of scumhunting. coming to a conclusion and then trying to find evidence to justify it. if you're town, you should re-examine your basic assumptions, perhaps imagine that i am already dead and flipped town if you really need that to help analyze.
I don't really feel like you've adequately explained how you think the person that you said you have a nulltell on is a better lynch than the person you have a scum read on, however small it may be.
i will answer this in PART 2
First, noting the irony of cave trying to use lockeZ's earlier question as a scumtell
actually in that post I said I leaned town on lockez and said that I initially thought the question may have had scummy motivations. since time moves forward linearly, i no longer think that. if scum you would feel obligated to answer because it is a question directly pointed towards you, in a game thread that you are playing in, and you did not express that you thought it was a bogus question (that was my opinion)
er how. the entire post is me going "I have no clue and this is why he must DIE!!"
because i'm not talking about that link. I'm talking about the one directly above it.
I mean this sounds good to me! Confirmed cave is pretty much nothing but good to town.
the context of this was quoting me talking about confirming myself as town. I guess this COULD be ambiguous..but usually people dont talk about dead scum, as, 'confirmed.'
throughout the argument with muffle I argue about how we can use your lynch to scumhunt + I scumhunted earlier today at this point so I guess I don't have to engage with this argument? I kinda felt like this day 1 situation was scumhunting though. I was sure that if you didn't die on day 1 that there was probably something rotten and I wanted to see who was opposed to it and why.
no you didn't scumhunt earlier today. every single one of your posts in this day phase has been about me, and your theory that you apparently determined *day 1* that, if I wasn't lynched day 1, then I must be scum. oh and picking up 1 thing said by psy, the other person voting you. this is the opposite of scumhunting. coming to a conclusion and then trying to find evidence to justify it. if you're town, you should re-examine your basic assumptions, perhaps imagine that i am already dead and flipped town if you really need that to help analyze.
I didn't vote for demon because I thought you were a better lynch for reasons I already stated above^^^ Basically, I thought we'd get more info from you than from him and I didn't feel that strongly about his scumminess anyway. I just admitted you had a point.
I don't really feel like you've adequately explained how you think the person that you said you have a nulltell on is a better lynch than the person you have a scum read on, however small it may be.
you're gonna have to explain this one. All i see is the post where I changed my mind. As far as I know, this isn't scummy behavior
i will answer this in PART 2
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK02/24/2018 03:45 PM: "I don't exactly see Gourd as overly suspicious. They're overly eager allright, which can point in either direction of scum or town on day one. "
he puts his read on gourd as 'null' at first
02/25/2018 12:57 AM:" @Gourd While I can't guilt you for eagerness I do still find it suspicious. I also find Cap's absence suspicious. Explain yourself Cap, for you are currently at the top of my list followed by Gourd."
So, now Gourd has been updated from 'null' to 'second scumread.' okay. not sure what changed between these two posts.
02/25/2018 10:04:
"I was trying to play the LockeZ game and try to get answers out of someone by giving a bad reason and trying to lynch them, it works miracles it seems.
#cancel
It being day one, I don't have any real suspects, and although I do find Gourd suspicious I don't find him suspicious enough to warrant a vote."
He's canceling his cap_h vote there. So cap is not an actual scumread, so, in reality, gourd is his top scumread, but also not good enough to warrant a vote, still.
02/26/2018 04:29 PM:author=Jeroen_Sol
Agreed on the nolynch doesn't help anyone. I wouldn't say Ozzy isn't suspicious to anyone else though. Ozzy, please answer my question from before.
I don't suspect anyone enough to warrant a lynch vote, my votes till now were all just to test the waters. Although Gourd does rub me off as suspicios, he's not suspicious enough to warrant a lynch imo. I should check who started the narrative against Gourd as I find this entire bandwagon against Gourd very suspicious.
what the fuck is going on
02/26/2018 04:29 PM:
I told you muppets not to kill gourd and now we lost our town gunman, good job!
are you kidding me? i really don't like this attempt to reframe what he was saying about gourd.
this was what ozzy did, revolving around you, and feels like what you have done with demonlord.
null>scum>*not here during deadline to fight against lynch of person I called scum*(this part is unique to you)>argh! I knew we shouldn't have lynched him!
which... part?? a lot of it is my answer to lockez's question that doesn't mean anything (which he seems to agree with me on).
the post where he says I was implying I knew how he would flip doesn't imply that at all as far as I can tell?
he also has a dislike that I had a nulltell for him on day 1 but only bc he thinks I was using it to avoid scumhunting. I argued earlier that is is *how* I was scumhunting.
I have a pretty strong feeling you and him are the scum team and now that I can live even after my death I can squawk about it until the end of time. XD I'm scumhunting you two today if this makes cave feel better!
for the benefit of anyone observing:
1. no it isn't
2. XD
3. this doesn't make any sense as of yet
4. this conspiracy theory that conveniently focuses on the two people voting you makes me feel better about this, yes.
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACKIs it okay if I act like this was my plan all along
if scum you would feel obligated to answer because it is a question directly pointed towards you, in a game thread that you are playing in, and you did not express that you thought it was a bogus question (that was my opinion)
author=Gourd_Clae
is this not the weirdest theory in the world or am I losing it?
I'm just not sure why else Jeroen was killed, apart from random chance it's either this or that he pushed cave. I don't think this is actionable if he died because of his cavevote because there's equal chance it was misdirection from scum. If you have some other theory, go for it.
author=Gourd_Clae
I don't like how psy actively diverted lynches from cave near the end and also never ever voted for cave.
Because I thought demonlord, aneko, you, etc, were all better choices than cave. I don't think "not voting cave" is inherently scummy (unless you and cave are scumteam in which case this is one of the dumbest busses I can think of)
Also, I do realize there's a nonzero chance I'm being led on by scum-Cave or something but that can be dealt with tomorrow if necessary -- your flipping scum would rule it out, for instance.
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACKFirst, noting the irony of cave trying to use lockeZ's earlier question as a scumtell
actually in that post I said I leaned town on lockez and said that I initially thought the question may have had scummy motivations. since time moves forward linearly, i no longer think that. if scum you would feel obligated to answer because it is a question directly pointed towards you, in a game thread that you are playing in, and you did not express that you thought it was a bogus question (that was my opinion)
I didn't mean as scumtell for lockeZ. You said it was a bogus question then used your analysis of my answer to it as a scumtell for me. Earlier you didn't seem to think there was anything to gleam from it. Your analysis is shaky anyway
plus idk that it matters that I didn't express that it was a bogus question at the time? Like, did I need to give a two week notice before I agreed with you? it wasn't relevant to me until now and I didn't like how you were weaponizing something that you called bogus before
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
I'm talking about the one directly above it.
I mean this sounds good to me! Confirmed cave is pretty much nothing but good to town.
the context of this was quoting me talking about confirming myself as town. I guess this COULD be ambiguous..but usually people dont talk about dead scum, as, 'confirmed.'
;w; my bad. I think the context you provided draws away from your conclusion that I was implying that I knew how you were going to flip. I was agreeing that it was good to confirm you as town, and then in later posts I clarify I had a nulltell and that was why I was voting. Both scenarios were good and I made that clear.
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
no you didn't scumhunt earlier today. every single one of your posts in this day phase has been about me, and your theory that you apparently determined *day 1* that, if I wasn't lynched day 1, then I must be scum. oh and picking up 1 thing said by psy, the other person voting you. this is the opposite of scumhunting. coming to a conclusion and then trying to find evidence to justify it. if you're town, you should re-examine your basic assumptions, perhaps imagine that i am already dead and flipped town if you really need that to help analyze.
um it's still scumhunting if it's about you cave (and you know other people. psy is another person). are you saying you don't believe I came to this conclusion day 1? If I can't show you a post of me explicitly stating this, I can definitely show you posts where I implied I thought this way. I picked up *multiple* things said by psy. In the same vein of thought, yeah, but I'm pretty sure I can find more? I feel like psy has theorized ALOT about scum team's motives this game and, in addition to the blatantly weird stuff I pointed it out, I don't think it's all that innocuous.
It's not like there's not more. When you look at who's left, here's how I see it from my perscpective. I honestly think who I feel is scum is more important than who I think is innocent, but, you can almost narrow it down based on my own feelings:
Gourd_Clae (town)
Muffle (town, was very honest, lockz has a good analysis of her, could be evil I guess but HIGHLY doubt it)
CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK (should have died day 1 mysteriously did not??, weak argument for me tbh, probably scum)
demonlord5000 (town)
Jeroen_Sol (town)
Cap_H (seems innocent to me, but idk, seems clueless which I don't see in scum,)
LockeZ (idk, but if cave is scum then he probably isn't)
psy_wombats (weird collusion with cave? weird posts about why jero died?
HuniBear (r they playing? I feel ike night would've taken longer if they were scum)
Aneko (r they playing but better than huni, I feel like night would've taken longer if they were scum)
If we leave out huni and aneko then there really aren't that many different possible scum teams. There's a good chance one of the two of you are scum and I mean... it might be psy... considering I think my argument is stronger there. But, the two of you are cooperating pretty heavily today so I feel like my suspicion is justified.
I can try and analyze pretending you had died and flipped town, but, like, you DIDNT flip town. It really doesn't have much bearing on whats happening now.
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
I don't really feel like you've adequately explained how you think the person that you said you have a nulltell on is a better lynch than the person you have a scum read on, however small it may be.
I do.
Day 1 I was trying to say I see the argument for demon's actions being scummy. Doesn't mean I had a scum read on him. I just understood the argument.
But, assuming I DID have a scum read on demon, it was day 1 and if I was going to lynch my nulltell instead of my scum read that would be the day. I also think it was justified because it would give more information.
idk some people said that I had a town read on demon and some people said I had scum read on him and that may be because I had no consistent read on him yesterday. The only consistent stance I took on that was that I didn't want to vote for him (bc of cave).
I will respond to PART 2 in SECTION II
actually nah. I think the crux of the argument is that I am acting like ozzy did, and on the surface that might seems true, but:
1. I never had a consistent read on demon, which is reflected in various people thinking I felt a different way about him
2. i uh, didn't exactly go "argh! shouldn't have lynched him!" what's really insidious about this narrative is that it existed before I even started talking today. yea. go and look back. I was literally responding to this narrative when I expressed that we shouldn't have lynched demon but didn't express that I thought this made me more town. I was just lamenting we didn't kill cave bc he must DIE.
3. I dont have a 3, cave's ozzy argument was around before I even started talking today, honestly think that invalidates it.
4. actually wait yeah I have another point!! ozzy's behavior also had little to no explanation as to what changed between posts but mine always have reasons. many, many reasons
5. so. yeah.
and more list shenanigans
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
1. no it isn't
2. XD
3. this doesn't make any sense as of yet
4. this conspiracy theory that conveniently focuses on the two people voting you makes me feel better about this, yes.
1. Well now that you clarified the ozzy post alright
2. ;w;
3. Hopefully it does now? I feel like you'll say it doesn't BUT
4. I already acknowledged that. In a way, I kinda feel like I should be targeting psy and not you but there aren't that many suspects left and you've been acting WEIRD ENOUGH. Hopefully my arguments make enough sense that other people will feel like taking action. for the record, if I was scum, I would actively work against accusing people voting for me bc it invariably looks reactionary. Even if you have a point
I guess I'll just post now since by time I look at this tomorrow it'll be close to deadline, and it seems neither of the two new players are going to post. One disappeared completely, and the other posted a single time with nothing in it.
If either of those two are scum, I'd consider this a lost game because it's impossible to read someone who isn't participating. That said, I'm not even going to consider them from this point unless they give a reason to.
As for active participants, here's my new reads. I was satisfied with lockez explanation, and I have no reason to consider muffle as scum as of now. Cap is sketchy just because his posts don't make a lot of sense, but I wouldn't vote that way tonight.
I've noticed psy and cave have been working toward the same goals, but I doubt scum would work together that closely. It is possible one of the two is scum while the other is town.
Gourds arguments have merit too but he isn't a bad vote if only because we can learn much from it. If he flips town, then it may be worth rereading psy and caves posts and voting for one of them. If gourd flips scum, I'd think it likely both psy and cave are town because they have been rather aggressive about lynching him.
If either of those two are scum, I'd consider this a lost game because it's impossible to read someone who isn't participating. That said, I'm not even going to consider them from this point unless they give a reason to.
As for active participants, here's my new reads. I was satisfied with lockez explanation, and I have no reason to consider muffle as scum as of now. Cap is sketchy just because his posts don't make a lot of sense, but I wouldn't vote that way tonight.
I've noticed psy and cave have been working toward the same goals, but I doubt scum would work together that closely. It is possible one of the two is scum while the other is town.
Gourds arguments have merit too but he isn't a bad vote if only because we can learn much from it. If he flips town, then it may be worth rereading psy and caves posts and voting for one of them. If gourd flips scum, I'd think it likely both psy and cave are town because they have been rather aggressive about lynching him.
author=LockeZauthor=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACKIs it okay if I act like this was my plan all along
if scum you would feel obligated to answer because it is a question directly pointed towards you, in a game thread that you are playing in, and you did not express that you thought it was a bogus question (that was my opinion)
hi hello What do you think of my argument? You may as well make yourself useful punk
author=psy_wombatsauthor=Gourd_ClaeI'm just not sure why else Jeroen was killed, apart from random chance it's either this or that he pushed cave. I don't think this is actionable if he died because of his cavevote because there's equal chance it was misdirection from scum. If you have some other theory, go for it.
is this not the weirdest theory in the world or am I losing it?
It was random. That would be a much more reasonable theory than a weird sense justice on scum's part
author=psy_wombatsauthor=Gourd_Clae
I don't like how psy actively diverted lynches from cave near the end and also never ever voted for cave.
Because I thought demonlord, aneko, you, etc, were all better choices than cave. I don't think "not voting cave" is inherently scummy (unless you and cave are scumteam in which case this is one of the dumbest busses I can think of)
I realize there are other explanations for your behavior. I was presenting some of what linked you and cave to support the idea you are scumteam together. in addition to those two things, you also agree to vote on me with very little resistance to cave's ideas which isn't something I've seen from anyone else today.
author=psy_wombats
Also, I do realize there's a nonzero chance I'm being led on by scum-Cave or something but that can be dealt with tomorrow if necessary -- your flipping scum would rule it out, for instance.
um why tomorrow?
author=demonlord5000
Gourds arguments have merit too but he isn't a bad vote if only because we can learn much from it. If he flips town, then it may be worth rereading psy and caves posts and voting for one of them. If gourd flips scum, I'd think it likely both psy and cave are town because they have been rather aggressive about lynching him.
if town wants to vote me idc as long as you consider my theory more strongly when I flip town.
I do think it is a good theory, but people seem to think that you are the better vote between you and cave. I do think he has an almost unnatural ability to survive considering how much we bring him up as a possible lynch.
I just went back and reread, that was my mistake. I thought cap said something too, but he only said he missed your posts without actually commenting on them. I think lockez is still considering both you and cave, but that list was awhile ago and I'm not sure how it holds up with all the new posts you made.
author=Gourd_Clae
It was random. That would be a much more reasonable theory than a weird sense justice on scum's part
Short any power roles or the ability to shut people up, I could see someone more whimsical trying it. Didn't cave say he usually targeted lurkers?
author=Gourd_Clae
um why tomorrow?
Like I said -- if you flip scum, I don't have to consider it.
I skimmed your anti-cave stuff again and I don't really understand your case against him, the limit of it seems to be that he's 1) accusing you and 2) working with me. #2 isn't very convincing to me, obviously, was there anything else? Process of elimination also isn't convincing because I think you're more likely than him.


















