THIS ONE'S FOR THE LADIES...AND PRETTY WEIRD...AND MAYBE A LITTLE GROSS
Posts
Sooz
They told me I was mad when I said I was going to create a spidertable. Who’s laughing now!!!
5354
I look forward to the upcoming game with silly string based combat!
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
Uh as long as it's not an X-rated game using silly string as some kind of weird Japanese censorship.
Wait. No. That might be amazing.
Wait. No. That might be amazing.
author=InfectionFileslol I'm glad somebody else said this.
Now Storm won't touch this topic for a few weeks and we'll get to hear about it and the aftermath in a blog or something
oy fucking vey
libby:
I just outlined why I WON'T be including that as an element in my game and WHY I won't be including it...and Libby started screaming at me. Maybe read a little more closely? I feel like you just see a few words and go fucking ballistic where if you look at the context you are shouting at me about something I already explained up front I was not going to do and WHY I wasn't going to do it. Like, take a breath, and read.
I for one would really appreciate it is you could turn down the reflexive outrage and turn up the reading comprehension.
Lemme be clear on a few things:
1) During the middle ages, it was not uncommon for the patriarch of a household to force a female child to take up the matriarch's "wifely duties" if the matriarch had passed on or could otherwise no longer perform them. When I say "this happened all the time in the middle ages" I'm not actually, literally claiming to have any idea how often it happened (if I had to guess, I'd guess maybe 5% of the time), just that it wasn't uncommon, it wasn't controversial, and it wasn't illegal.
2) "It was the middle ages and people hadn't invented morality yet" was lighthearted shorthand for "social mores were dramatically different".
3) Along the same lines but not as inherently rapy or horrifying, until the end of the 19th Century it was customary for a man to wed his brother's spouse if his brother died.
1) I did not ask you anything. You're a dude. See thread title.
2) I certainly did not ask you a yes or no question, or your permission to make my game however the fuck I want to, so this isn't something you get to say "no" too, at least not and have it mean anything. Saying that the answer to a question that wasn't a yes-or-no question and which wasn't directed is "a big ol' no" at you is pretty damn rude. I did not ask your permission to make my game however I feel best. I asked if there were any female users that for one reason or another had any issues with their first periods.
LockeZ is the only other person in this thread that has said anything that makes any sense. He is also a dude but in this case his input is welcomed because it saves me the effort of explaining stuff I shouldn't have to explain because it's obvious. No, I was not saying that every single person during the middle ages was raped by their dad. I was saying that this is a thing that could potentially have happened to my MC, again, one I considered and rejected.
ANYWAY, ANYHOW: the menarche/menstruation stuff will be toned down to the point of subtext. A witch's mark (stigmata on the left hand) will largely stand in for menstruation: one of many advantages there is that it is pretty easy to conceal menstruating, but pretty I haven't decided how many living parents Camilla has or if either of them are abusive.
"Don't worry; it's just stigmata
Pass me a napkin
And don't you dare tell my mother."
Song lyrics, from the band Clutch, summarize better than I can the intended tone here, the conflation of magical abnormal bleeding (stigmata) with ordinary period bleeding by the use of the surrounding language and context: textually, we're talking about stigmata, subtextually, we're talking about Menarche.
@InfectionFiles, Mirak: Okay, now I will engage in my time honored custom of flying away from this thread without ever looking back. : )
libby:
author=Me
Another idea I considered but rejected is that the mother died during childbirth and the father doesn't know the first thing about menstruating, but I found this logically leading to the fact that it's practically more likely than not that in the absence of her mother, her father would have begun to sexually assault her. (As gross as this is, this still does happen in modern society at least it was hapening well into the late 20th century, but since we're talking medieval Europe where no one's got any morals or ethics that we would recognize as such, it seems more likely than not.) But idk, that specific effed up family life feels like a cliche to me. Also this is going to be a dark dark dark dark dark dark game. If I'm doing my job even half-right as a game designer and storyteller you'll wind up liking and relating to (sometimes playable) characters that die horribly, tragically, or brutally later on, Game of Thrones style (but less excessive) or cross the moral event horizon to the point hwere you can no longer earnestly root for them (also Game of Thrones style). If I put all that rapey stuff in her backstory, I feel like I'd be courting Darkness Induced Audience Apathy
I just outlined why I WON'T be including that as an element in my game and WHY I won't be including it...and Libby started screaming at me. Maybe read a little more closely? I feel like you just see a few words and go fucking ballistic where if you look at the context you are shouting at me about something I already explained up front I was not going to do and WHY I wasn't going to do it. Like, take a breath, and read.
I for one would really appreciate it is you could turn down the reflexive outrage and turn up the reading comprehension.
Lemme be clear on a few things:
1) During the middle ages, it was not uncommon for the patriarch of a household to force a female child to take up the matriarch's "wifely duties" if the matriarch had passed on or could otherwise no longer perform them. When I say "this happened all the time in the middle ages" I'm not actually, literally claiming to have any idea how often it happened (if I had to guess, I'd guess maybe 5% of the time), just that it wasn't uncommon, it wasn't controversial, and it wasn't illegal.
2) "It was the middle ages and people hadn't invented morality yet" was lighthearted shorthand for "social mores were dramatically different".
3) Along the same lines but not as inherently rapy or horrifying, until the end of the 19th Century it was customary for a man to wed his brother's spouse if his brother died.
author=visitorsfromdreams
Yeah thats a big ol' no from me dawg.
1) I did not ask you anything. You're a dude. See thread title.
2) I certainly did not ask you a yes or no question, or your permission to make my game however the fuck I want to, so this isn't something you get to say "no" too, at least not and have it mean anything. Saying that the answer to a question that wasn't a yes-or-no question and which wasn't directed is "a big ol' no" at you is pretty damn rude. I did not ask your permission to make my game however I feel best. I asked if there were any female users that for one reason or another had any issues with their first periods.
LockeZ is the only other person in this thread that has said anything that makes any sense. He is also a dude but in this case his input is welcomed because it saves me the effort of explaining stuff I shouldn't have to explain because it's obvious. No, I was not saying that every single person during the middle ages was raped by their dad. I was saying that this is a thing that could potentially have happened to my MC, again, one I considered and rejected.
ANYWAY, ANYHOW: the menarche/menstruation stuff will be toned down to the point of subtext. A witch's mark (stigmata on the left hand) will largely stand in for menstruation: one of many advantages there is that it is pretty easy to conceal menstruating, but pretty I haven't decided how many living parents Camilla has or if either of them are abusive.
"Don't worry; it's just stigmata
Pass me a napkin
And don't you dare tell my mother."
Song lyrics, from the band Clutch, summarize better than I can the intended tone here, the conflation of magical abnormal bleeding (stigmata) with ordinary period bleeding by the use of the surrounding language and context: textually, we're talking about stigmata, subtextually, we're talking about Menarche.
@InfectionFiles, Mirak: Okay, now I will engage in my time honored custom of flying away from this thread without ever looking back. : )
but I found this logically leading to the fact that it's practically more likely than not that in the absence of her mother, her father would have begun to sexually assault her. (As gross as this is, this still does happen in modern society at least it was hapening well into the late 20th century, but since we're talking medieval Europe where no one's got any morals or ethics that we would recognize as such, it seems more likely than not.)
That's the part people had issue with. As though laws were the only thing keeping men from raping their daughters.
Not the fact that you decided not to do it, but that you seemed to think every girl without a mother was getting raped by her father in any Age and that only the laws of the 20th Century was stopping the rape. Oh, and that people had no morals back in ye olde times.
1 - wifely duties weren't 'lets bang' but 'you take care of your younger siblings, cook and clean while I work and make money for the household'. Somehow jumping from that obvious aspect and going to 'fuck my daughter' is like, ummmm
2 - they weren't that different, surprisingly. raping your daughter was still seen as something only the most disgusting and vile man would do. funny that
3 - marrying your brother's widow is incredibly different to fucking your daughter. for one, no actual blood relation (unless you're royalty cos gotta keep that blood pure, yo). for two, you're legally taking her in to protect and look out for (since otherwise she'd be on her own and looked down on by society as someone lesser than most other women, being 'despoiled') and she thus stays safe in her family. and for three? it was her choice to marry him or not. there may have been some social pressure, but she also had the choice to live by herself and remarry elsewhere - if she had the money for it - or move back home to her non-rapist father's house and live there instead.
a last point - a father who was looking to cash in on his daughter's virginity (a big deal back then oh ho) would not despoil his daughter and her marriage chances in that way. If she was pretty she could marry up and bring in better wealth and help for the family. If not pretty, she could still marry someone a bit above their current station or someone she loved and be happy. But checking the sheets was a huge deal in medieval society. (Didn't stop young lovers from taking tousels in the hay, but when caught doing that, forced marriages between said lovers were very much a thing to cover up the despoiling of the daughter). It makes no sense to ruin the family chances of getting better off by destroying one of the main treasures of the household.
So, even if the father was a fucking asshole, he wouldn't ruin his chances of getting a better life for himself by using his daughter. That's what serfs and other mens daughters were for, after all. -_-
















