EVIL
Posts
Another thing to chew on, Hitler didn't physically murder millions of jews. He was a leader with human beings at his side that willfully followed him. He perpetuated the idea, but he didn't round 'em all up and pull the switch on every single gas chamber.
He was a leader because he was given power. There were people who believed in his idea. He was a brilliant manipulator, sure, but he didn't get there alone. He wasn't God, he was a man.
He was a leader because he was given power. There were people who believed in his idea. He was a brilliant manipulator, sure, but he didn't get there alone. He wasn't God, he was a man.
stirring the pot here..
The truth is, right and wrong are entirely relative to societal norms. And "truth" is entirely dependent on what we can see and understand. There was a time when people thought diarrhea and seizures were evil.
...
tl;dr: there is no good and evil. you are now breathing manually.
Disagree. Strongly. Not the kind of argument I intend to get into on an internet forum, though. I just would like to register that I do not believe in absolute moral relativism. And no, I'm not a religious fundamentalist or anything of the sort. I believe that there are objectively good (moral) and objectively evil (immoral) acts, but they are very, very rare, and the vast, vast majority of acts fall into the middle ground, a gray area where they are open to interpretation. This is one of the beliefs that, in my life, has been just has important in terms of story-telling as it has in real life. We are all the protagonists of our own narrative; no one is the villain of their own story.
But are there acts that are inherently good or inherently evil? Yes.
(BTW, I didn't quote that part of your post, but it is unusual that you believe in both moral relativism and determinism. Most philosophies that advocate one of those rejects the other.)
He was a leader because he was given power. There were people who believed in his idea. He was a brilliant manipulator, sure, but he didn't get there alone. He wasn't God, he was a man.
Agree (Hitler is no less responsible for their deaths, others are just equally responsible for them. Hitler killed all of them, but the guys flipping the switches and pulling the triggers still killed the ones they killed.), but I would take this a step further and in a different direction. Germany as a nation--including its people--should have been held far more responsible at the end of WWII. The nation of Germany should not have been allowed to exist AT ALL after the crimes committed by the vastly overwhelming majority of its populace (and yes, I consider nonresistance in certain circumstances to be equivalent to a crime).
Of course, history AFTER World War II indicates I may be wrong here. The collective guilt that almost all present-generation Germans feel about the Holocaust--the resentment that they feel towards warlike and imperial policy and behavior-is the strongest possible argument against what I just said.
On a lighter note--
isn't this topic Godwin's law by default?
post=140157
there is no good and evil...
Basically, I agree with what Max said.
By my standards and viewpoints, yes, there is. I'm also the kind of person that would kill those who committed what I believe to be evil acts...if I wouldn't be chastised for it. I've got a strong sense of justice.
And whether or not you do or don't agree with my viewpoints on what evil is doesn't matter. What matters to me is all that matters to me.
If it is evil, it is evil and--at that point--the opinions of others don't matter.
post=140160
Another thing to chew on, Hitler didn't physically murder millions of jews. He was a leader with human beings at his side that willfully followed him. He perpetuated the idea, but he didn't round 'em all up and pull the switch on every single gas chamber.
He was a leader because he was given power. There were people who believed in his idea. He was a brilliant manipulator, sure, but he didn't get there alone. He wasn't God, he was a man.
Also this.
post=140180that isn't justice...
I'm also the kind of person that would kill those who committed what I believe to be evil acts...if I wouldn't be chastised for it. I've got a strong sense of justice.
post=140180well then you're close minded aren't you.
If it is evil, it is evil and--at that point--the opinions of others don't matter.
you dont care if other people think something's evil or not and you're willing to kill evil acts. what if you were wrong?
1) What was the most evil thing you have ever done?
In elementary school, I would make fun of this girl named Erika because she had a VERY deep and husky voice along with the other kids, although I was teased as well because I wasn't "black enough" was deemed a.................happy person. Still, it felt good to have someone lower on the social food chain than I was and it helped take some attention off of me. I feel like crap typing that because I have NEVER, EVER done anything like that since....... I was around 7 or 8 then...
2) What was the most evil thing ever done to you?
When I was 14, some mother fucker broke into my house and stole my brand new PS2, my games, my memory cards and had the AUDACITY to step on Persona 2. I was heated.
3) What was the most evil thing ever done?
Slavery, the Holocaust and the Trail of Tears.
post=140225
you dont care if other people think something's evil or not and you're willing to kill evil acts. what if you were wrong?
You're missing my point.
If I were willing to go as far to kill someone who I thought was evil, then I--at that point--would utterly believe I was right. It's not that I'm close-minded, it's that I would be willing to go that far for something I utterly believe is true and just.
post=140255post=140225You're missing my point.
you dont care if other people think something's evil or not and you're willing to kill evil acts. what if you were wrong?
If I were willing to go as far to kill someone who I thought was evil, then I--at that point--would utterly believe I was right. It's not that I'm close-minded, it's that I would be willing to go that far for something I utterly believe is true and just.
Erm.. I'm not sure you've fully understood HER point.
Your definition of evil is not the same as everyone's definition of evil. Perspective and circumstance account for everything a human can judge and understand. If you can only see and be from one pair of eyes and in one body at any given time, then you have a single-minded perspective.
If you "utterly believe right," at any time, how can you call that anything other than close-minded?
If society also believes you were right, you get a medal of honor. If society happens to disagree, you go to jail.
I'm sure McVeigh thought he was utterly right. What can we use to judge if not our own moral compass? Although I'd personally put on the brakes if my conclusion was "Blow up a lot of innocent people."
I'm sure McVeigh thought he was utterly right. What can we use to judge if not our own moral compass? Although I'd personally put on the brakes if my conclusion was "Blow up a lot of innocent people."
1) What was the most evil thing you have ever done?
...So I left the body in the Hudson river and the police and STILL looking for me
Im actually having trouble thinking of something. One time I fake laughed at this girl in the first grade after I was told by one of her harpy girl friends that she liked me; in the end I would only laugh at the prospect and hurt her feelings only because...
1 - Back in those days, girls were icky
2 - I always (and still do, probably!) think to myself that I would never want to subject anyone else to the humiliation of being with me.
2) What was the most evil thing ever done to you?
I'll just go with the first one that came to mind.
I was "mugged" once in high school (on school grounds incidentally) for a few quarters. After he "commanded me" to take my pants off to ensure I didn't have any money; I gave him a deranged smile, plopped a few quarters into his hand and walked away. In retrospect a stupid idea. I could have been shived for turning my back to the low life prick... But this isn't Nightblade's self pity corner.
3) What was the most evil thing ever done?
This is a loaded question. How many lives have been purged from this earth for religion or country? How many lives ruined by the whims of leaders or psychopaths alike? Countless.
God told me it was a good idea.
My Race is better than yours.
I just felt like it.
There are of course acts that fall under a gray area, but I'll spare this any further diatribe on the virtues of "good" and "evil".
Im actually having trouble thinking of something. One time I fake laughed at this girl in the first grade after I was told by one of her harpy girl friends that she liked me; in the end I would only laugh at the prospect and hurt her feelings only because...
1 - Back in those days, girls were icky
2 - I always (and still do, probably!) think to myself that I would never want to subject anyone else to the humiliation of being with me.
2) What was the most evil thing ever done to you?
I'll just go with the first one that came to mind.
I was "mugged" once in high school (on school grounds incidentally) for a few quarters. After he "commanded me" to take my pants off to ensure I didn't have any money; I gave him a deranged smile, plopped a few quarters into his hand and walked away. In retrospect a stupid idea. I could have been shived for turning my back to the low life prick... But this isn't Nightblade's self pity corner.
3) What was the most evil thing ever done?
This is a loaded question. How many lives have been purged from this earth for religion or country? How many lives ruined by the whims of leaders or psychopaths alike? Countless.
God told me it was a good idea.
My Race is better than yours.
I just felt like it.
There are of course acts that fall under a gray area, but I'll spare this any further diatribe on the virtues of "good" and "evil".
post=140457:( how awful
I always (and still do, probably!) think to myself that I would never want to subject anyone else to the humiliation of being with me.
post=140255...is murder ever true and just though
it's that I would be willing to go that far for something I utterly believe is true and just.
post=140377
Your definition of evil is not the same as everyone's definition of evil. Perspective and circumstance account for everything a human can judge and understand. If you can only see and be from one pair of eyes and in one body at any given time, then you have a single-minded perspective.
If you "utterly believe right," at any time, how can you call that anything other than close-minded?
Perhaps I am close-minded, though I never have seen myself as such.
People are influenced throughout their life by society and the things they see, hear, etc around them. This eventually made up the society we live in today, right.
Anyway, it's not like my view of justice, good, and evil is vastly different from everyone else's or even yours.
post=140377
If society happens to disagree, you go to jail.
Hypothetically, what if I think society's opinion is wrong?
post=140472
is murder ever true and just though
Murder is only the initial act made by the criminal. Taking the life of that murderer is just, because once they've done so they've reduced the value of their own life to nothing. Taking the life of a murderer is not murder.
Hypothetically, what if I think society's opinion is wrong?
I suppose you weigh the how bad this guy is versus how much you'd prefer not to spend your life in prison. But if you're so sure he's as bad as you think, wouldn't you be able to prove it in a courtroom?
Taking the life of a murderer is not murder.
There was a relevant myth in the Buddhist tradition (in hide tabs so I don't bore those who don't care):
There was a ship with a hundred crew members and one man who was a Buddha incarnate. The Buddha sensed that there was a traitor aboard the ship and he knew who this man was. If left to his devices, this man would sink the ship in the middle of the ocean, murdering everyone aboard. So, the Buddha did the just thing: he killed this man and saved his crew mates. However, due to the evil karma this act brought with it, the Buddha was sent to hell for this act until he had accrued enough karmic energy to again attempt to reach nirvana.
His decision to save his crew members was selfless and just, but the act of killing is always bad karma.
TL;DR - The act of killing is still murder, even if it is the right thing to do.
I see what you're saying, F-G, but I can't help but admit I don't find guilt to be a strong enough punishment.





















