New account registration is temporarily disabled.

RMN BUGS (V3)

Posts

author=GreatRedSpirit
I didn't edit this post but it is noted as edited. Or I had a complete memory blackout for a second or something.Has anybody noticed anything similar to this or am I going crazy?

date_posted - date_edited
2011-06-10 15:17:03 2011-06-10 15:17:04


All of the date_edited fields are populated, but most are the same value as the date_posted. So I am guessing that you managed to post at 15:17:03.99 or something, and the millisecond between assigning date_posted = now() and date_edited = now() incremented, resulting in two different second values.

Now I need to find out the reason why date_edited is being set at all...
Unless there's another report of it I wouldn't worry too much about it. It's weird but harmless. Maybe I did have a bit of a memory blackout too, or I hit edit->save without any changes. I'm more curious if anybody else has seen anything like it in case it is in fact a real bug and not my memory punching my face again.
It happened to me once too though I didn't really think to much about it just figuring I probably doubleclicked the post button or something.
author=kentona
Now I need to find out the reason why date_edited is being set at all...

date_edited = DateTimeField(null=True, default=utils.now)

EDIT: since it was saving the date_edited twice there was a slight chance that the values could be slightly off, I made sure it is only saving the date_edited once so this should not happen anymore
author=Fallen-Griever
author=ankylo
author=calunio
Can this be fixed non-manually?

http://rpgmaker.net/games/1802/portuguese/
Fixed
Is that fixed for all pages etc. because I noticed that quite a few of my old tutorials/reviews were like that (stupid Word).


No, it has to be done manually, either from the old db or by you going in and editing the text.
I recently posted a download and set it to be the main download while it was still pending. I was confused because this popped up the main-download button on my gamepage (the link from which 404s). So it's just sitting there, showing "13.x MB 0 downloads", and of course I can't unset it as main download.

Of course I don't mind having an approval queue, but might we fix this so the button doesn't show up, or it defaults to the last main download or something, until the download gets approved?
yeah, we should do that! I will look into it.
Sailerius
did someone say angels
3214
I seem to have a ghost message in my mailbox. It's flashing that I have a new message, but there isn't one in my mailbox. I'll try to describe what happened:

I received a new message and when I replied to it, it timed out. However, when I checked my sent messages, the message had sent, so I didn't bother resending it. That's when I noticed that the message I had replied to was marked as read, although it still said that I had a new message.
This isn't really a bug per say, but I would it be possible to fix replies in messages so that the RE: didn't build up with each reply (ex. over time, having RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE:RE MessageTitle). Yeah, I know we can just technically delete the extra RE: if we wanted to, but I'm so used to other emails just doing it automatically that I don't start noticing until the message title is sprawled all the way across the screen.
Noo. That's not a bug, that's a feature. What would messages be without all the REs? (I for one am annoyed when emails remove the extra REs. I say those are the buggy ones)
In any event, it would be a pain in the ass to implement, so it's not happening.
When clicking on Reply can't you check the subject line with a regex /^RE:/i and if it doesn't match append a RE: to the front of a message? I'd have to look at the system to see how it does it to determine if it would be a problem or not.
Actually, this is really easy to do.

What is the consensus on this though? If it is something people would like, it will be in RMN4.
quit undermining me!
Heh; Poor Kentona. ...But actually, I delete all but one 'RE' whenever I send a reply. So as small and silly as it is, this would be a nice implementation. =P