EDGEOFCHAOS'S PROFILE
EdgeOfChaos
1755
Search
Filter
Soul Shepherd
It's been 3 years since the last major update. But anything is possible, I guess.
But on the bright side, it's functional and fun right now too!
But on the bright side, it's functional and fun right now too!
Manifest
Yeah that fight was awesome :D. So close. Naxxaroth's fight was pretty similar, with the entire party besides one getting wiped at one point.
Manifest
I finally completed the game 100% (every item on the list collected and fought naxxaroth, all chars 99) in just over 20 hours. Great game! I just wish there was some special reward for all relics and killing the Timid Yeti (yes, I dealt all 800K damage to it to find it gave nothing :( )

I also have a video of the final boss on Legendary mode, but it's a bit boring tbh, I'm not sure whether to upload it.

I also have a video of the final boss on Legendary mode, but it's a bit boring tbh, I'm not sure whether to upload it.
Lunatics with guns, domestic terrorists and homophobia...
A Fancy Little Adventure
Dolly
Lumina
I played this a while back so I'm not sure if you changed anything, but (no offense) the English was really bad and not understandable at parts.
I liked the system though so I'm going to play through it and review (and also stream probably)
I liked the system though so I'm going to play through it and review (and also stream probably)
of games, representation, and women's cheekbones
So an SJW, Max McGee, and a moderator walk into a bar...
(serious): Can you please use normal terms to explain your position? I could play bullshit buzzword bingo with those posts of yours. Probably very few people here have majored in women's studies, so this is the equivalent of me using some complex programming concept unnecessarily to explain how to do something in RPGMaker, or Sated using some synthetic chemistry analogy to explain his position. No one's going to read an essay, fyi.
For example: instead of "male gaze" and the conceptual man to explain why a company does something, you could just say "because men like it". You don't even need D'Orsay's essay to understand that.
(serious): Can you please use normal terms to explain your position? I could play bullshit buzzword bingo with those posts of yours. Probably very few people here have majored in women's studies, so this is the equivalent of me using some complex programming concept unnecessarily to explain how to do something in RPGMaker, or Sated using some synthetic chemistry analogy to explain his position. No one's going to read an essay, fyi.
author=WetMattos
also, regarding male gaze, we're talking about a conceptual man, not all men. this is an important distinction to make, because these theories rely on understand the way by why we conceptualize things influence how things are. we call this social construction of reality. toni d'orsay has a good text on it, i can fetch for you when i come back from my thingie.
For example: instead of "male gaze" and the conceptual man to explain why a company does something, you could just say "because men like it". You don't even need D'Orsay's essay to understand that.













