THENECROMANCER'S PROFILE

What I quoted shows that you said you didn't want to write a review, but then did anyways after you failed to get Sated to retract his review. That's a fact regardless of what else was in the quote. Unless you followed it up with "jk", which you didn't.

You claim that the "discussion" on the other review is completely unrelated, even though it's pretty obvious that this review is a direct response. You didn't like his review, and wrote one of your own instead of trying to...I dunno, get him to change his mind by the things you posted in the comments. A point that Solitayre made and you tried to dismiss, probably because you felt insulted that he pointed out that you were complaining.

The part I removed from the quote doesn't matter because that is your opinion and it's unrelated to the part about how you didn't want to write a review. You felt that you weren't complaining, but many others saw it as complaining. Just like the review itself, it's all opinion so nobody is right or wrong. But you didn't like the fact that someone else had a different opinion so you tried to invalidate it by spewing nonsense that nobody really bought into.

It's nothing new. There have been countless arguments over the opinions expressed in reviews, or anything posted in the history of the internet, but you can't seem to admit to the fact that it's simply complaining. You can't change the fact that other people have different criteria for enjoying a game and will focus on different things when writing a review. And bitching about it in the comments sections is pointless.

I have no problem with your review, just your denial. So I'll leave it at that. "Good review"

don't bother. i'm fairly certain it won't make a difference. i have been doing extensive work with event collision in my 2k3 Zelda game. what happens is that the hitbox of the event moves instantly to the next tile when it decides to move. the speed of the event only affects how long it takes the sprite to follow. being on the top(or bottom) layer probably won't make a difference to the hitbox, but anything is possible.

you would need a custom system that uses a different measure of detection. which is possible, although i haven't tested my theory. from what i remember if you track the coordinates of an event with variables, it doesn't follow the hitbox. it follows the sprite and it's located at the bottom/middle. and if you use a formula to extrapolate a box from that point, you will have a more accurate hitbox that follows the sprite. it's just a matter of doing the same thing for every event and creating a way to detect collision. it's probably similar to kazesui's tutorial on pixel movement in 2k3, which i haven't read yet.

this is poop. it's worse than poop. it's sucks poop. give me back my time playing this. i was tricked. there is no point in playing unless you want to get a high score and everything about the way this was coded brings out the very worst in the tile based movement and hit detection of events in 2k3.

i would give it a 0.5 and suggest that it only be played if you are about to get in a fight and you want to build up some rage. i dislikeyou. i flogging dislike you.

stop living.

edit: xD i was pissed and obviously didn't beat your score.

i was wondering why this even got accepted to the site, but it makes sense that it's from release something. altho, i would suggest that what i see here shouldn't even qualify! as there is what, 1 minute of gameplay? the rule was that there had to be at least 10 mins. and judging from what i read, this isn't even worth playing 10 times xD but whatever, cg's on the easy MS

The author needs to remember the rule of 3 (any pattern lasting longer than 3 tiles looks unnatural)

hahah say whaaa?