UNITY'S PROFILE
I don't want to wake up because I'm happy here.
Izrand Allure
A JRPG-style WLW romance adventure. Monsters have invaded Izrand! Heroes Vivica and Lynette find love and despair as they seek to save a continent.
A JRPG-style WLW romance adventure. Monsters have invaded Izrand! Heroes Vivica and Lynette find love and despair as they seek to save a continent.
Search
Filter
How to make an unpopular RPG Maker game
It occurs to me that I should probably change my title
It occurs to me that I should probably change my title
Speaking of pokeymans, i never did the voting for Kids Design 3. But then again, it never got the critical mass of submissions needed to facilitate a voting round. Oh well.
Yeah, maybe we could try another one sometime and roll both into one for voting and such :D They're so much fun, I'm sad that the last one got so much less traction
Pokemon just revealed the SV DLC OST and it consists entirely of stolen fan-music from YouTube. How is this legal? And the musitians can't even fight it in court because they're poor hobbyists fighting a billion dollar corporation.
author=Red_Novaauthor=ShinanIt's true that, in strictly legal terms, using any IP that doesn't belong to you for any purpose is copyright infringement. It's also true that most companies have enough sense to know that going after harmless fan works is a bad idea on, like, every conceivable level.author=IrogFan art in general is a breach of copyright but I guess the copyright holder can be gracious enough to allow people to make fan art as the pokemon company has done there. It's perfectly legal and easier than having to give specific permission to everyone who asks to make something derivative of the stuff you own.author=AveeThese are rules written by big corporations to claim ownership of art they didn't make. Are these rules legal ?
In fact, Game Freak are legally entitled to do so:
https://www.pokemon.com/us/legal/
That being said, I remember listening to a lawyer talk about copyright law a long time ago, and they said that while you can't claim ownership over someone else's IP, no else can claim ownership over the actual work you created. If you drew Pokemon fanart, for example, Nintendo or Game Freak can't come in and say that they own the art you made, only the IP. So, if I'm remembering correctly, I'm pretty sure claiming someone else's fanworks as their own is not the right of the corporations unless there is documented proof somewhere that the person who created the arrangement explicitly agreed to those terms.
Law is convoluted and hyperspecific and goes on a case by case basis, though, so don't bring my name up as evidence if anyone decides to sue Game Freak for copyright infringement XD I'm just not big on trusting corpos following the law just because they wrote a paragraph in a tab called Legal Information.
Yeah totally. There's also an added wrinkle of the whole "how will this hold up in court" part. I still think the kosher and morally in the clear thing would be to ask the fanwork creator for permission, but it's not like the Pokemon company is really worried about losing in court to a fan creator remixing a copywritten piece of music. It sucks for the little guy but thaaaaat's copyright! (or captialism? Or law? Or just our world in general? Dunno)














