New account registration is temporarily disabled.

SOOO... GAMERGATE

Posts

(@Pizza, his silly statements were probably directed at me)
pianotm
The TM is for Totally Magical.
32388
I actually agree with your last statement.
author=EdgeOfChaos
It makes no sense to say "This is how it was for me, so this is how it is for other all people"
And I fixed it for you. This IS how it is for OTHER people.

Lock the thread.
nhubi
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
11099
pianotm, let it be. If the mods want to lock this they will, or they will simply let it die a natural death as happens with most threads. Nothing that has been said in the last posts are any more offensive or parochial than a lot of what came before.


Oh and Isrieri, a lot of people watch or have watched porn, of all varieties in the gender spectrum, some people just don't advertise it. So your dream is still alive...though this could be a worry for them

porn=small brain
author=TehGuy
http://www.rpgcodex.net/forums/index.php?threads/worst-thread-ever-general-gaming-sjw-dumping-ground-currently-airing-gamergate.90469/page-367#post-3542787

People are shooting this link down too quickly. It's a pretty objective standpoint that makes a lot of sense to me, and I hate 99 percent of everything I read.

Also, I agree with EdgeOfChaos about the insult thing:

Pussy and wiener are synonyms that both mean "weakling."
Dick and cunt are synonyms that both mean "jerk."

Calling a woman a cunt can definitely have further reaching implications, and it's generally a good idea to avoid that if you don't like the idea of getting burned at the stake, but, in the general sense, there's nothing more insulting about female genitalia than male genitalia, at least in my experience. It's just like being called a "dumb fuck." People aren't consciously thinking you're bad at sex when they say it, it's just a substanceless insult, and since there's shame and taboo around genitalia, they make good substanceless insults, too.
Roden
who could forget dear ratboy
3857
author=pianotm
Lock the thread.


I'm not saying her entire post is invalid, and this topic is far from being toxic. Somebody brought up counterpoints. Whoops, I guess that's a sign a discussion is getting out of hand! I agree that most of the things Liberty referenced are things that actually happen sometimes and that some are indeed general scale wrongs in society. Here are the points that upset me, because I thought they were completely unfair:

Men cat-call women and consider it a compliment.


I have legitimately, honestly never been witness to a man cat calling a woman in public. I worked in construction too- often depicted as the root of cat calling. I've had guys ask me if I'd do a girl, which was person to person and not screamed at some passer by, so it's completely acceptable behaviour.

Men are almost never shown sexed up - the male version of sexed-up is either them wearing a suit or underwear in an underwear ad.


While not as insulting or pervasive as women being used for marketing, society presents unfair "goals" to men all the time. Nigh every male protagonist or ad subject is depicted as being tall, dark and handsome, composed of 99% pure muscle. You could say "but that's positive!" but it isn't. Many people can't even actually get that physically fit, and it implies that if you aren't Hercules then you aren't really a man at all.

And of course this is generalisation but the fact I have to put that line in is pathetic - because when talking about women it's never generalised.


I think that most people in this thread would agree that there are unfair generalizations about women all over the place, and that there really shouldn't be. But that can't be used as an excuse to generalize against the opposite gender, because it undermines the entire point of what's trying to be said.

Little girls are taught that wanting to be sexy and pretty are what they should aim for in life. Little boys are taught that they can do anything they want when they grow up! Be a firefighter? Sure! Want to become an astronaught or the president? Definitely! But if a girl wants something like that she is told "wouldn't you rather be a princess or a mother instead?"


This is completely outdated information that was outdated even when I was a kid. My female friends and family talked about their future all the time and not once did they seem limited in what they could be. There's a woman running for president right now, and there's been a female Prime Minister of Canada and tons of female leaders all around the world, as well as females in just about any role that you can think of. I think it's rather obvious that girls can be whatever they want in society.
nhubi
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
11099
author=Pizza
I think it's rather obvious that girls can be whatever they want in society.

Can be, yes. Are, no.

Forbes women in senior management

Fortune 500 Women

Parliamentary seats held by women Yemen, Qatar and Palau are letting the side down.

Women as head of state this one is from 2012 but it's not changed much.

I'm not refuting your other points, I don't disagree with some of them, and generalisation gets you in trouble every time, but the problem here is simply a case of this is something that could be, but it is not something that currently is.
Roden
who could forget dear ratboy
3857
I agree. I was pretty put off in our Introduction to the Games Industry class when every job was listed as being 80%+ staffed by men. But I think it's not right to say that women are taught that they can't achieve anything. I wasn't raised as a girl (duh) so maybe I missed some of that teaching actually occurring, but the problem lies more in the vein of women getting hired less rather than being taught that they can't have jobs.

That definitely needs to change.

EDIT: As for what I can do about that, or what anyone could, really, I don't know. As the hopeful head of an indie studio, I can take it upon myself to be fair. But I don't know how I'd help to fix this problem on the large scale.

Another interesting point is that in our class of game design students, there are only 2 women and maybe 20 or so men. So perhaps in certain cases it's that women don't want to be involved in certain industries as much as men do? The same goes for scaffolding, it's mostly men- but pretty much every man on site believes that female scaffolders are fucking insanely skilled at the job, so I don't think the gender gap in that industry is due to unfair practices as much as it might be in others.

Of course, that's 100% pondering, but I thought it was an interesting point.
The sheer fact that there is a handful or male-gendered insults vs the literal crap-load of female ones is totes personal experience! Sure.

There are maybe four or five male gendered insults that are used often. They aren't considered very insulting to anyone. You can call someone a dick and not be looked at twice.

Here: I went through a list of 'bad words' and pulled out all the male and female gendered ones. Should prove a point. Note which ones are considered more severe and insulting.

Male
Bollocks
Boner
Chode
Cock
Dick
Dickhead
Nutsack
Pecker
Penis
Prick
Renob
Schlong
Scrote
Skeeter
Testicle


Female
Axwound
Bimbo
Bitch
Bitchtits
Boob/y
Callgirl
Camel toe
Clit
Coochie
Cooter
cumdumpster
cumslut
Cunnie
Cunt
Cunthole
Clitface
Douche
Douchebag
Girl
Gooch
Hoochie
Hooker
Ho
Kooch
Minge
Muff
Panooch
Pissflaps
Poon
Poonani
Poontang
Punta
Pussy
Queef
Skank
Slut
Snatch
Tit
Tramp
Trollop
Twat
Vajayjay
Vag
Vagina
Whore
Woman

These were found over various sites on swear words. I excluded the homosexual ones because they could have been their own list (there's a lot of them) as well as repetitive ones that use the same word to the same effect.

Isrieri
"My father told me this would happen."
6155
All I'm saying is that trying to seek objectivity and equality regarding an issue that is inherently not is just confusing yourself. False equivalency is the thing that took me the longest to wrap my head around because I couldn't figure out why women shouldn't just be treated equally as a default measure. I've observed this to be the thing that well-meaning men who want to support gender equality have the hardest time understanding.

Essentially, if you want to get metaphorical (which is totes my thing) its like building a bridge over a canyon to meet someone who's climbing up the side.

And no, that article is only pretending to be objective. Hence this sentence:

Should Zoe Quinn get death threats? Of course not. Nobody should. But she is a liar, a manipulator, a cheat, and a hypocrite. I don’t believe in karma, but goddamn. It should at least make you think.

It shouldn't even be objective to begin with. This is an emotionally charged subject and an important one for humanity at large. People should take sides and know why they're taking them.

I don't care what the hell she did or didn't do. Why does she deserve any of this crap? I've yet to hear a convincing argument. Other than "cuz she was a total bitch." Even if someone does deserve punishment for actual wrongdoing...like say stalking or threatening someone with death...it is not the place of random internet nerds to mete out revenge. I'd be happier turning the discussion to why the authorities aren't doing shit about this because there's a lot to discuss there in regard to gender politics and internet politics as it stands.

I hate that gamergate is still a topic that is getting recognition in the media - its like how Neo Nazis can rally and hold protests and meetings and stuff. Its not illegal, but everyone with a brain stem could tell you that they aren't campainging for anything wholesome. The difference here is that people do think that the gg guys have a point because they don't get the false equivalency deal: "Women shouldn't be entitled to special treatment! They have the same damn opportunities as we do! Men and women should be on even turf!" is what I imagine they shout. Which sounds idealistic, but its missing the point. I refer you to my Death Note comparison on page 1.

Which is that a man in a situation and a woman in a situation are not the same inherently; at this period of history. And that not a lot of people recognize that to be the case.



And yeah, just because differing opinions are going down is no reason for a thread lock. This seems like an appropriate place to talk about these issues.
TehGuy
Resident Nonexistence
1827
author=Isrieri
Women shouldn't be entitled to special treatment! They have the same damn opportunities as we do! Men and women should be on even turf!" is what I imagine they shout.

They.. uh.. don't.

I'd be happier turning the discussion to why the authorities aren't doing shit about this

This, however, has been something buzzing around my mind as well. I've yet to see anyone toting anything around about someone on either side actually getting arrested for the threats and other shit going down (doxxing, etc)

The only bit of real legal action I've seen tell of is the whole deal with Mr.Cernovich

author=Pizza
I was pretty put off in our Introduction to the Games Industry class when every job was listed as being 80%+ staffed by men.

I'm not, to be honest... I feel as if a good way to help fix that, though, would to be to somehow garner more interest in STEM fields (comp sci classes and all that). Lord, I remember how barren my HS comp sci and calc classes where.. In both there were literally maybe two or three women :I

I'm just happy uni seems to have a larger representation.. Hopefully it'll grow over the years

EDIT: apparently some stuff went down about it on the Colbert Report just a few hours ago (GG, that is)
Corfaisus
"It's frustrating because - as much as Corf is otherwise an irredeemable person - his 2k/3 mapping is on point." ~ psy_wombats
7874
author=TehGuy
I'd be happier turning the discussion to why the authorities aren't doing shit about this

This, however, has been something buzzing around my mind as well. I've yet to see anyone toting anything around about someone on either side actually getting arrested for the threats and other shit going down (doxxing, etc)

The only bit of real legal action I've seen tell of is the whole deal with Mr.Cernovich

The admin of 8chan might be able to fill you in on that, though he's content on throwing a politician "we are doing all we can to look deeper into the matter" brush-off, all the while getting that 'anonymous, trolling coward' quip at the end that no one can respond to in order to claim superiority and inspire lingering pain towards the matter. Essentially, he pulled the real world equivalent of going "your mother never loved you" *log out*.

Men cat-call women and consider it a compliment.


I have legitimately, honestly never been witness to a man cat calling a woman in public. I worked in construction too- often depicted as the root of cat calling. I've had guys ask me if I'd do a girl, which was person to person and not screamed at some passer by, so it's completely acceptable behaviour.


I have. Many times. I've also heard about it from friends, family and other women that I've met and worked with in the past. It happens a lot.

One friend of mine was followed for half a block by a guy because she didn't smile at his 'compliment' about her breasts.

My sister - when she was 15 - thought she was going to be raped by one guy who she smiled at one time after he told her she was cute - he followed her home. She was terrified. The next time she saw him, his friends were laughing while he talked about how 'that slut over there (her) wanted him so badly that she showed him where she lived' and that he was going to 'visit her soon'.
She doesn't smile at people anymore because to a woman, a compliment can get you killed - just because a man thinks you led him on and denied him what he wanted.

My cousin is harrassed almost every day by a group of older teens when she walks too and from school. She asked them politely to stop, explained that it made her nervous (which was a huge thing for her because she's very shy) and they laughed it off, telling her she should 'learn to take a compliment' and that 'she shouldn't dress so sexy'. She wears a school uniform to school - the pants version, because she's scared of showing any skin to give them something to 'compliment'... not that it stops them. Now they just comment on how nice her 'ass looks in those pants'.

Many of the women I've worked with - even older ones - are harrassed every day. Whether it be men whistling at them while they walk down the street, men demanding they smile 'to look pretty', men giving opinions on what they're wearing "You should try wearing a skirt next time, baby!" or what they're doing "Bend over more so I can see that ass!"... there are literally hundreds of examples in my life alone.

This is not new and is a component of every day life for a woman. It exists and it is rampant.

Really, go ask the women in your life about cat calls and the like. Sit down and ask for a serious talk - just note that what they do tell you about is the very tip of the iceberg.

Just because we don't complain about this to men doesn't mean it doesn't happen. You know why we don't talk about this to men? Because that is the kind of shit we get back in return:
"I've never seen it."
"I never heard of such a thing happening."
"It's only some men, not all of us."
"I've never done that!"

:|

Men are almost never shown sexed up - the male version of sexed-up is either them wearing a suit or underwear in an underwear ad.
While not as insulting or pervasive as women being used for marketing, society presents unfair "goals" to men all the time. Nigh every male protagonist or ad subject is depicted as being tall, dark and handsome, composed of 99% pure muscle. You could say "but that's positive!" but it isn't. Many people can't even actually get that physically fit, and it implies that if you aren't Hercules then you aren't really a man at all.

Right... because women aren't taught from a young age that they have to be an amazon to be considered pretty. That they must look a certain way in order to be worthy of love.
Oh, you can't wear those clothes or the boys won't notice you. You can't go out without make-up or you won't look good for men! You want to look good for men!
You're too fat. You're too thin. You're face is the wrong shape. You nose it too big. No, wait, it's not big enough! You're legs aren't the right shape. You don't have big enough breasts. Wait, no, you need more of an hour-glass figure! You can't go out looking like that! Your dress is too short/long. Your make-up is too much/little. You look like a whore, a slut, a prostitute. You look like a prude, a virgin, an old lady.

Society pushes women all the time - look like supermodels because that's 'what men want'. Even though the supermodels don't look like their photos, that is what is constantly pushed as the ideal for a woman to live up to.

Men have expectations, yes, but their expectations are to succeed. Women's expectations are to change everything they are in order to 'get the guy'. A man with enough money can rock a beer-gut and be balding and still get the hot girl, but a woman can't do the same. She has to use her success to make herself look good and then she can spring for the cute guy. But before 'improving' herself? Yeah, good luck with that...



This is completely outdated information that was outdated even when I was a kid. My female friends and family talked about their future all the time and not once did they seem limited in what they could be. There's a woman running for president right now, and there's been a female Prime Minister of Canada and tons of female leaders all around the world, as well as females in just about any role that you can think of. I think it's rather obvious that girls can be whatever they want in society.


Oh really? Because girls are still being pushed out of the different science, engineering, mechanic, mathematical and other 'man'-based areas all through school. They have to be better than the boys in order to be considered on the same level.

I had a job where I was heads and shoulders the best worker. I was also the only female at that time. I was passed over for promotion three times because 'our clients wouldn't respect a woman as much as they would a man, so sorry' - even though the men who got said promotion were lazy assholes who did the work in question wrong and constantly messed up (the fact that they had three men replace each other for the same position due to said lazyness and messing up says a lot as to their being fit for that position). And because of those three men the company lost it's lucrative contracts. I quit before they could let me go - principle of the thing -, even though they begged me to stay because 'I was their best asset.' They eventually offered me a promotion but by that time the company was basically sunk. Nope.

Yeah, that's a personal anecdote, but it's one I've heard a thousand times from a thousand other women. And those are the ones who will talk.


Anyway, this is getting off the subject of GG and into other territory. So, back to the subject at hand:
GamerGate should burn in a fire because nothing is going to come from a movement that was started for the sole purpose of attacking a person instead of an ideal.
Corfaisus
"It's frustrating because - as much as Corf is otherwise an irredeemable person - his 2k/3 mapping is on point." ~ psy_wombats
7874
author=Pizza
Men cat-call women and consider it a compliment.

I have legitimately, honestly never been witness to a man cat calling a woman in public. I worked in construction too- often depicted as the root of cat calling. I've had guys ask me if I'd do a girl, which was person to person and not screamed at some passer by, so it's completely acceptable behaviour.

You see, that's kind of a part of the problem in and of itself. You're taking a woman you don't know, demoting her to an object to have sex with and entertaining the thought without her knowing. How is this any different than any of Liberty's personal experiences?

Do you think she would want to be viewed in such a way and not be completely disturbed by the notion if she knew what you and your compadres were thinking?
pianotm
The TM is for Totally Magical.
32388
OH! Men not being shown sexed up! I had this discussion with my wife. She bet me and we went to Barnes and Noble to the magazine section. Except for fashion mags, crafts and most gun mags, almost every magazine had a woman with a bikini on the cover, including Men's Health and even some of the gaming mags. I was only able to find one magazine with a half naked muscle man on the cover aside from the weight lifting mags and my wife laughed her ass off. It was a gay mag!
author=Liberty
Anyway, this is getting off the subject of GG and into other territory. So, back to the subject at hand:
GamerGate should burn in a fire because nothing is going to come from a movement that was started for the sole purpose of attacking a person instead of an ideal.

I think this is pretty much all that needs to be said on the subject of GG honestly. That's the roots of so called "defending journalism", and with a name that makes no sense (Watergate Scandal happened at Watergate) those that actually want a less biased media shouldn't have jumped onto a burning ship.

Also, anyone who listens to a woman's problems and makes it about how they aren't like the men she's describing, or that they haven't seen it, really need to take a moment and reflect why that's not the best way to go about listening to someone who took the time to confide in you. Of course not all men do it, but this isn't supposed to be about you; you're not the one in that particular conversation who laid out their problems in hopes someone gives a damn.
Isrieri
"My father told me this would happen."
6155
author=Corfaisus
author=Pizza
I have legitimately, honestly never been witness to a man cat calling a woman in public. I worked in construction too- often depicted as the root of cat calling. I've had guys ask me if I'd do a girl, which was person to person and not screamed at some passer by, so it's completely acceptable behaviour.
You see, that's kind of a part of the problem in and of itself. You're taking a woman you don't know, demoting her to an object to have sex with and entertaining the thought without her knowing. How is this any different than any of Liberty's personal experiences?

Though your general point stands, I don't think that's what he meant at all.
Roden
who could forget dear ratboy
3857
Whatever, I fucking lose. Good job! I admit defeat. I must be doing something wrong if I'm being met with such negative feedback. It only makes sense.

I don't even fucking care to discuss it anymore. I care about equal rights, even if I apparently don't understand in the slightest what the term actually means. I can only do so much as one fucking miserable person. The fact that I give as much of a shit about the rights of a Human as a person who hates the species in question is mind boggling enough by itself.

Things would be better if everyone on Earth was dead, even if people don't want to admit it. The number one problem with society is that society even exists in the first place.

inb4 "Pizza is being a dramaqueen again"
Honestly, if it's between yourself and a friend, it's quite normal - saying 'wow, they're hot' or 'she's really cute'. Women do that too - "Major hottie at 4 o'clock!" and "Oooh, he's looking sharp!" What you say to a friend out of hearing is very different to what you shout out for any and every person to hear.

It's about shoving your unwarranted opinion on the person in question without them asking for it in any way, shape or form. If they're in a bar and you go up and tell them you think they look good tonight that's different to shouting out to a person on the street to 'show us your tits!' Very, very different. (Mainly because the social constructs are more flexible in a bar where people expect to meet others. Also, she can tell you to go away and have various bar staff back her up if she feels that you're overstepping your bounds and annoying her. Not so if you're shouting at her from the street - because other people there aren't obligated to help if it goes wrong.)

(I have had someone shout "show us your tits" at me, btw. I was walking home from the supermarket with a bag in each hand, just minding my own business (not that it should have mattered if I hadn't been)
The last male irl that I told that to asked me what I was wearing at the time. My reply was "clothes" because it shouldn't matter if I were wearing a mini and tank top or a long, conservative dress - it's still harrassment, but apparently it's the women's fault if she was wearing something that shows any skin. I'm not even going to go into victim blaming. >.<; )

harmonic
It's like toothpicks against a tank
4142
Honestly, I'm not sure what SJWs want. Are they proposing demographic-based legislation? Or is it just... "awareness"? It is really a shame that legitimately egalitarian men, most of whom are harmless nerd gamers, are being disenfranchised and shamed for the gender they have.

Cat-calling is not a tit-for-tat thing when it comes to gender harassment. Men are constantly thrown homosexual pejoratives for not being manly enough, or poor pejoratives for not having enough money. To judge is to be human.
Ratty524
The 524 is for 524 Stone Crabs
12986
author=Gourd_Clae
@Avee I'm sure plenty of men can't relate but saying we can't accurately understand isn't something I really agree with. It actually feels like a bit of a slap in the face for trying to understand.

I absolutely agree with the rest of your post though.

No one can truly step into another person's shoes and fully grasp their experiences. Being able to find relationship and sympathy is nice, but you can't say you understand the impact of what they're going through when in actually, you share little to none of their traits. Don't take it personally, it's just a fact.