[MAFIA] PRISONER'S DILEMMA. GAME OVER
Posts
Alright, if this is what we are doing I can get onboard. I do see ivory's point about the role cop role itself being possibly scummy, if it's even a real claim (which I've never been convinced it definitely is).
#lynch Psy
I also probably won't be able to post much (or possibly at all) after this for D1 because of work.
#lynch Psy
I also probably won't be able to post much (or possibly at all) after this for D1 because of work.
I've been thinking about psy's role again, and about how cave would balance it. As a town role, it's an extremely weak role that probably won't hit anything useful. Even worse, we only get two shots out of between a ton of players. If you think about it as a scum role though, it gets extremely powerful. In fact, I'm not sure I would want to chance scum role cop.
I also don't like how psy randomly went after ozzy when the focus has been on much more suspicious behavior. I think I'm going back to the way I was originally voting.
#lynch Psy
I also don't like how psy randomly went after ozzy when the focus has been on much more suspicious behavior. I think I'm going back to the way I was originally voting.
#lynch Psy
CURRENT VOTECOUNT
Psy_Wombats (7): Shinan,Pianotm, Ivoryjones, pianotm, Oddrabbit, Tale, demonlord, Fomar, Ozzy, Ozzy, Ivoryjones, PlatinumAshes, AlaskanEmily, Demonlord
Shinan (4):kittenfood, Liberty, pianotm, kittenfood, demonlord, Fomar, Ozzy
Pianotm (1):PlatinumAshes, PlatinumAshes, Psy_Wombats, Liberty, Liberty
Liberty (0):Fomar, PlatinumAshes, pianotm,Oddrabbit, Tale, pianotm, pianotm, Ivoryjones
PlatinumAshes (0):Pianotm, Liberty, Fomar, AlaskanEmily, Fomar
Tale (0):AlaskanEmily
demonlord (0):Ivoryjones
Fomar (0):Liberty, Ivoryjones, Ozzy
No Lynch (0):Tale, Fomar
Not Voting: Tale
-
Psy_Wombats (7): Shinan,
Shinan (4):
Pianotm (1):
Liberty (0):
PlatinumAshes (0):
Tale (0):
demonlord (0):
Fomar (0):
No Lynch (0):
Not Voting: Tale
Psy_Wombats has been executed. He was a scum-aligned rolecop.
Day 1 is over. Night 1 begins. No speaking in thread during the night. If you have a night action, please get it in within 24 hours.
Day 1 is over. Night 1 begins. No speaking in thread during the night. If you have a night action, please get it in within 24 hours.
Liberty was killed during the night. She was a scum-aligned vanilla goon.
Day 2 Begins. It ends Friday at 10 PM EST or when someone is killed. With 11 alive, it takes 6 votes to execute.
Day 2 Begins. It ends Friday at 10 PM EST or when someone is killed. With 11 alive, it takes 6 votes to execute.
Booya! I called it! I knew that Psy was scum! I didn't trust his Role-Cop claim for a second! Even though it did end up being true XD
that's pretty good! so now piano is really suspicious then too, right? if we follow the reasoning that implicated liberty?
Right now I am seriously suspicious of Piano, still.
For the lynch, when he was saying things like "you might as well vote for me", that kind of looks like a subtle way to try to get some people to switch their vote to him when town didn't just immediately think Psy was in the clear.
I also still don't feel like either side of the Liberty/Piano argument was all that...honest. I could absolutely believe they were both scum.
But like...maybe I'm just not that experienced in the ways of the mafia, but what is the deal with the scum kill? Is that just to make it...harder for town to not mislynch? Is it to sow some kind of confusion about whether our other other suspicions were correct, or were false?
For the lynch, when he was saying things like "you might as well vote for me", that kind of looks like a subtle way to try to get some people to switch their vote to him when town didn't just immediately think Psy was in the clear.
I also still don't feel like either side of the Liberty/Piano argument was all that...honest. I could absolutely believe they were both scum.
But like...maybe I'm just not that experienced in the ways of the mafia, but what is the deal with the scum kill? Is that just to make it...harder for town to not mislynch? Is it to sow some kind of confusion about whether our other other suspicions were correct, or were false?
Also, I'm gonna go on ahead and tell you that I shot Liberty. I am the town-aligned 1-shot vigilante.
My best guess on the night results is scum withheld their kill, and town has a vigilante that can kill. I don't know if that's the case, but that's what it looks like with these results.
Piano is definitely suspicious. I wasn't sure about a piano/psy team day 1, but a piano/liberty team does make sense given what was happening. My only doubts here is that piano was the whole reason we went after psy in the first place. Would scum piano really buss his partner that early?
That said, I am willing to vote piano, I just have some lingering doubts.
Piano is definitely suspicious. I wasn't sure about a piano/psy team day 1, but a piano/liberty team does make sense given what was happening. My only doubts here is that piano was the whole reason we went after psy in the first place. Would scum piano really buss his partner that early?
That said, I am willing to vote piano, I just have some lingering doubts.
Which leads me to believe that Scum must've hit a protected person tonight. Because day 2 started before 24 hours were over, which means all night actions were given in.
While I agree that Piano is the most suspicious and he is on the top of my scum list right now, I'm also warry of PlatinumAshes. He claimed he was going to either shoot Liberty or Piano tonight, which I saw as really fishy because I am the 1-shit vig after all.
My theories as to why he said so the following: Either he is vanilla town who tried to breadcrumb scum into shooting him.
OR
He is scum who said that at the end of day 1 so he could claim vig on day 2, which I don't find that likely as he had no way of knowing that either Piano or Liberty would die to an actual town aligned Vig.
My theories as to why he said so the following: Either he is vanilla town who tried to breadcrumb scum into shooting him.
OR
He is scum who said that at the end of day 1 so he could claim vig on day 2, which I don't find that likely as he had no way of knowing that either Piano or Liberty would die to an actual town aligned Vig.
i still am confused about how this works. when we do actions we are allowed to claim or just if it is relevant somehow to the current conversation? what is the criteria for this group?
This here is the post I was referring to.
https://rpgmaker.net/forums/topics/24686/?post=887589#post887589
We also can't ignore the possibility of PA voting on his scumpartner to cover himself. I'm going to go through the thread again and see his interactions with Piano, Psy and Liberty and see if I can come to a conlusion.
I personally prefer the theory where he tried to bait scum to NK him, but I can't be sure.
https://rpgmaker.net/forums/topics/24686/?post=887589#post887589
We also can't ignore the possibility of PA voting on his scumpartner to cover himself. I'm going to go through the thread again and see his interactions with Piano, Psy and Liberty and see if I can come to a conlusion.
I personally prefer the theory where he tried to bait scum to NK him, but I can't be sure.
PA also said he'd investigate me at one point too. I'm not sure if he was breadcrumbing or not, but he was being extremely obvious about what he was doing.
author=kittenfood
i still am confused about how this works. when we do actions we are allowed to claim or just if it is relevant somehow to the current conversation? what is the criteria for this group?
You can claim a role at any point, whether you have that role or not. But it is a risky thing to do if you do no have that role because you can arrouse suspicion from someone who actually has said role.
I claimed my role now because I already used it up. I could only shoot a player once in the entire game, and me being town and keeping that a secret now that I've used it is literally pointless. However, you have to take into consideration that there is nothing that verifies my claim. I could very well be lying, which I know I am not, but all of you can't know that.


















