MILLER'S HOLLOW MAFIA - GAME THREAD

Posts

Dudesoft
always a dudesoft, never a soft dude.
6309
author=Liberty
I just read through three pages to catch up and I have no idea what the hell is going on still. >.<;

Lol
I've gone back to page 4 and read most of it (cave diatribes too much).
PA is either new and slipping or new and werewolf; probably the first.
Happy is plateau of Happy, whatever that means.
Liberty is surprisingly a question mark. I expect innocent, but it isn't sticking in my mind.
Trihan is eh, I dunno. Town maybe?
Zeuzio is definitely town vanilla. If I know him at all the lethargy of having no powers would knock the wind out of playing; and I can sympathize there; though IRL stuff has apparently been the real issue. Even still, IRL or no... I think he'd put more effort in if there was something to do.
Not much read on anyone else.
Which is to say, dick all to play with. You're all ????'s. All that's happened in 11 pages is technically hot air, but at least Cavedog has been breathing down necks to unsettle the would-be standstill.

---

After a few minutes of deliberation, I will bandwagon on PA.
the reason is as simple as adding to the bonfire of sweat on PA's brow to see if he'll slip. I'd expect no less on myself, so why not? We're searching for a needle in a pile of seringes. Someone's going to bet hurt regardless.
#lynch---- wait a second!

LIBERTY; how can you be confused after 11 pages of rabble?!
Eh... Anyway. #lynch PlatinumAshes
Btw, I know levity is a bad idea here, but I can't resist...
A vote for me is a Vote for Me.
How can I not be? It's the same every first day - people prod and poke each other and we can't really get much of a read. Maybe I need to re-read everything but from what I saw it's all bluff and bluster and calling others out over tiny things. And sure, that's how the game is played, but we've nothing concrete yet so it's just all over the place.
Thus my usual no-lynch stance. The likeliness of us finding a werewolf on day 01 is pretty slim and it's better (imo) to try to keep numbers up at the start of the game (in other words, not accidentally killing one of us) than to have a three-day game because we lynch ourselves into oblivion - it has happened a few times.

Frankly I figured the election idea was something more interesting and beneficial to spend the first day on, but it seems everyone is content to just let it slide. :/

And for some reason, the way I read the description made it sound like we have to elect someone first day? If we don't have a time limit to elect someone, then why not just choose to not elect? It keeps the double-vote out of nefarious hands.

Is this possible? Let us know, GM. Do we have to elect a sheriff at all?
Dudesoft
always a dudesoft, never a soft dude.
6309
author=Liberty
Frankly I figured the election idea was something more interesting and beneficial to spend the first day on, but it seems everyone is content to just let it slide. :/

And for some reason, the way I read the description made it sound like we have to elect someone first day? If we don't have a time limit to elect someone, then why not just choose to not elect? It keeps the double-vote out of nefarious hands.

Is this possible? Let us know, GM. Do we have to elect a sheriff at all?

Jeroen said he's away today (or maybe yesterday). Either way, he also noted early on that the election is a gimmick that he's trying out. If it doesn't work, that makes sense.
It IS a lot of power to entrust to someone on a day when we can't decide who is who; however, I will gladly kiss babies for something fun like that role!

Liberty, you're correct in the previous post that it's a lot of hot air, but it's the hot air we float this air balloon on. For instance, Gourd_Clae had more to say last game iirc, but here he's sorta just poking his nose in a little. Still making valid points, so he gets a plausible pass. Little shit like that.
Yellow Magic
Could I BE any more Chandler Bing from Friends (TM)?
3229
author=CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
that was so early on that i forgot about it. No, I don't. firstly because the hypothetical was bad reasoning on my part (lynching the cop claim after his supposed guilty target flips town is something with town motivations behind it as well) secondly because it's day 1 and the information present in the game has at least doubled since then.

Bad reasoning? You don't admit to that very often...


That's not what I said. What I said was that I have not seen reasoning as to why we should do it. That sentence was in specific reference to Gourd and Adon's votes on him, which seemed to have zero motivation behind them. it's usually a bad sign when a bunch of people start voting someone for seemingly no reason.

I'll admit I was just paraphrasing then, but no, that isn't what you said either. It might be what you MEANT, or what you only NOW are saying, but it isn't what you said. There's a difference.

And you are right: The lack of concrete reasoning on their part could be a telling sign if PlatinumAshes turns out NOT be a werewolf. Let's stay in Wonderland and we shall see how deep the rabbit-hole goes...
Yellow Magic
Could I BE any more Chandler Bing from Friends (TM)?
3229
author=Liberty
And for some reason, the way I read the description made it sound like we have to elect someone first day? If we don't have a time limit to elect someone, then why not just choose to not elect? It keeps the double-vote out of nefarious hands.

Is this possible? Let us know, GM. Do we have to elect a sheriff at all?

I was confused about this too, and the answer is the sheriff will elect someone at random by the end of the day if we don't elect someone ourselves.
Then holding off isn't something we should do.

I still maintain that my plan is the best idea for the beginning of the game.

Another question, though - can an elected sheriff give the role to someone else or step down from being sheriff if they want? If the answer is yes, I will promise this if elected -

If elected the double-vote will be unused for the first two nights. Locked down. If I'm not dead before then I will stand down from the role and allow another sheriff to be elected (if it's possible) if enough people want someone else as sheriff.

This keeps a big weapon out of play for two days. What happens after that - towards the end-game, when we have more knowledge - is up to village votes (by then the other townfolk should have a better idea of who is more likely to be town.)
Dudesoft
always a dudesoft, never a soft dude.
6309
If elected sheriff, I promise to elect Liberty as my deputy.
I will also lower taxes and stuff.
my fingers are crossed behind my back on the taxes.
Yellow Magic
Could I BE any more Chandler Bing from Friends (TM)?
3229
author=Yellow Magic
I'll admit I was just paraphrasing then, but no, that isn't what you said either. It might be what you MEANT, or what you only NOW are saying, but it isn't what you said. There's a difference.

Just to clarify CAVE_DOG, I know you said you hadn't seen any reasoning, but not specifically from Adon or Gourd.

author=Liberty
What happens after that - towards the end-game, when we have more knowledge - is up to village votes (by then the other townfolk should have a better idea of who is more likely to be town.)

CAVE_DOG already pointed out that votes could be easily swayed by the Werewolves, especially two days later when the Villager numbers would have thinned down considerably.
...Read the rest of the post.
Ugh, wrong button.

As I was saying, after the first two nights it would be then up to town to vote a new sheriff. We don't have the choice of not having a sheriff from the sounds of it, so this is the best way to use the damn thing that I can think of. We can put it out of the way until the end. More than likely whoever is sheriff before then will have been killed (without protection - we might have a doctor who can protect the sheriff and so keep that part of the plan in action).

At the end of the two nights, if the mainstay sheriff is still alive... well, we're going to have to have a sheriff anyway so it's going to be an issue. Saying 'oh but werewolves might sway the vote' is correct, but my initial idea of having it be blocked by having the sheriff lock it down completely was bombed by Cave who said it's a great weapon for town.

I'd prefer to have a sheriff keep the vote a non-entity all the way through. Full stop. Unfortunately, who can people really trust to keep their word that they won't use it?

I'll be willing to put my life and word on the line. If I go back against my word, kill me and never trust me again in future mafias. Because I'm playing the long game here - not just one mafia but all of them.

Reputation - I'm not gonna screw people over when I give my word. Mafia is srs bsness, ya know?

So here's my election platform and general plan - as sheriff I will lock down the vote so it doesn't get used. If we've a protector, protect me.
- After three days (two nights) I will step down as sheriff if the people want. Keep in mind that I'll only listen to an 100% full vote against. This means that yes, werewolves can try to swing that vote in their favour but essentially the town will have to think through it themselves as they always have to do in this case.
- With a 100% vote against that means no-one has confidence in my duties as sheriff or that they want to use the double-vote for something. I can't vote on this.
- In that case I will step down and town can vote a new sheriff.

Why am I detailing this? So that you all know what you're agreeing to straight off the bat.
- Locked out double-vote for as long as I remain sheriff/alive until after the second night.
- Step down with a 100% no-confidence vote that I have no say in after the second night.
- If the 100% vote doesn't go through, I remain locking the vote down.
- This means I don't vote, ever. However I keep the double-vote out of enemy hands.

Vote for me if you think this is a decent plan. Don't vote for me if you don't. I'm not changing it - this is my election promise: Double-vote lock-out.
Yellow Magic
Could I BE any more Chandler Bing from Friends (TM)?
3229
The problem is the question you mentioned in your post: Whether the Sheriff CAN step down. The description on the Sheriff card simply said "Whenever he dies, a new Sheriff is elected by the live townspeople", so I'm going to guess it's not.

I'm not going to lie: I think it's a good plan. However, I'm going to wait until Jeroen confirms whether or not a Sheriff can step down.

Seeing as I don't want the day to end before possibly electing someone

#cancel lynch on PlatinumAshes
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
Day 1 votecount as of July 7th 18:00 GMT Summer Time:

Election:
CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK: 2 - Gourd_Clae, CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
Happy: 1 - Happy
Trihan: 1 - PlatinumAshes
Dudesoft: 2 - Dudesoft, Trihan
Liberty: 3 - Liberty, Adon237, wildwes
Not voting: MirrorMasq, Yellow Magic, Zeuzio, SorceressKyrsty

Lynch:
CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK: 1 - Happy
PlatinumAshes: 1 - Dudesoft
SorceressKyrsty: 1 - MirrorMasq
Yellow Magic: 1 - CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
Zeuzio: 1 - Adon237
Nolynch: 3 - Liberty, wildwes, Trihan
Not voting: Gourd_Clae, SorceressKyrsty, PlatinumAshes, Zeuzio, Yellow Magic

With 13 players alive, and no sheriff, it takes 7 people to hammer.

Day 1 will end at noon GMT Summer Time, July 8th, that´s in 18 hours.

Sheriffs can't step down, and if no majority is reached by the end of the day, I will go by plurality before randomly assigning a sheriff. In case of a tie, I will randomly pick between the people with most votes. This applies to both lynchvotes and election votes.
If there's more no lynches will you pick that? Or are you gonna pick to lynch someone even if it's more in favour of not?

Not stepping down... Right - amendment then. Instead of 100% no-confidence vote, lynching. If, on the third day, the village no longer thinks I should be sheriff, lynch me and elect a new one.

I will not roll false. I will lock down the double-vote for as long as I survive. This will take it out of play. You only have my word, of course, but let my actions speak for me.

Again, if you don't think locking down the double is a good idea or don't trust me, don't vote for me. Let me be a sacrifice for the town so that no werewolves get their hands on the damn thing.
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
If there's more nolynches than lynches on one person, it will of course win by plurality.
CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
On sunny days, I go out walking
1142
this business of electing the sheriff in order to game the setup needs to take a backseat to finding the scum. we have twenty-four hours or something. Vote for whoever you think is town (ME!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!) and then help me lynch the first scumhaver, who is Zeuzio.

The People of The New Anime Republic Vs Zeuzio

Wat. I know Jeroen said he may have added extra roles, but c'mon? Day Cop?


Not sure why you expect us to trust you out of the blue, haha. Like you said, the only person we know to be town so far are ourselves. Oh yeah, it's because you're Cavedog and you say funny things during mafia games.

Anyway, I'm not sure we should even elect a sheriff tbh. At least not until we have a confirmed townie. But then they'll just die anyway so meh. :/


Welp, gotta go. I'll be back whenever.

I guess I might as well leave this here: #lynch Wildwes. I'm interested to see how today turns out.


In the first two posts, Zeuzio expresses disbelief regarding my cop claim. But then he votes for wildwes anyway, a lynch that was only supported by my cop claim at the time. Note that this is the only vote Zeuzio has cast all day. Votes as a whole, that is. Zeuzio has not voted to elect anyone either.

author=Zeuzio
Too many posts... ;~;

So Cave's claim was fake(obviously), Liberty's plan is too risky, and a Wildwes lynch probably isn't happening.

#Cancel

author=PlatinumAshes
Every player has posted at this point, but there are 3 players who have been minimally active (2 posts or less). It is, then, not out of the question that at least a percentage of the actual scum has been lurking so far. It would be a very tactical decision.


A fair point.



This post always struck me as weird. Why, exactly, is a wildwes lynch not happening today? That seemed like a weird claim to make at the time. Zeuzio quotes Platinum who says that "scum might be lurking" to say that it is a fair point. Okay. I've already explained this, but I think this looks an awful lot like Zeuzio is attempting to appear to be active without actually saying anything of note.

Yeah, sorry for lurking and stuff. I was hanging out with friends and was not able to check the game on most of the 4th and 5th, and I was exhausted by the time I got back, only to have six more pages of posts to look through. Sorry if I haven't been able to come up with a solid opinion of everyone yet. :P


Well, Zeuzio was posting during those times, so I'm confused as to why he was apparently willing to make calls like 'wildwes lynch probably isn't happening' and also somehow managed to read all of Liberty's manifesto and divine that her plan was too risky. Sounds like someone read at least a little!! But let's see what he came up with when he came back:

Okay.

I think Cave is likely town, but due to his playstyle I simply can't put enough faith in him to elect him! XD I modded a game where he duped the entire town, even when a person who had just died and saw incriminating flavor and then was revived was convinced.

Liberty is playing her usual town style, though I don't think she's been mafia very many times so I don't know. There's also the fact that what she proposed about being sheriff would be pretty ballsy thing for a mafia to suggest and, like Cave said, wouldn't even help them much until lylo.

I'm not seeing what's so scummy about Platinum. I've guessed the mafia/town ratio as a townie before, and imo that's hardly enough to justify being on my radar. and what I said about his point being fair was just me trying to say something even though I was really tired and couldn't think! XD

and uh, that's all I've got for now. I'd have to read everything again in order to really get a read more. ugh.



what the heck is this!!! Two town reads, one null read, anD TWO ANIME EMOTICONS?? Notice how the town reads are not really based on anything. It's just "cave seems town" and "liberty seems to be town." It's pretty easy for scum to make these kinds of calls, since they know who is town. In addition, Despite thinking that I am town, he explicitly says he will not elect me (????). He doesn't say he won't elect Liberty, but he doesn't do it in this post. And it's pretty obvious he was thinking about elections while making this post, since he mentioned that he wouldn't elect me. So you have two people you are confident are town, but will elect neither of them? There is only one reasonable answer as to why. Zeuzio also says, again, that he needs to reread.

Either he is lying about needing to reread, or he reads very closely information that pertains specifically to him, because he recalls one offhand comment I made about his response of Platinum being odd and responds to it. This was like, a couple of sentences buried in a text post in this sea of a thread.

Then he says uh and ugh in the same sentence. classic scumtell. Not really. kind of. but the rest of what I said is important. Zeuzio has been just floating along, not making any calls of any kind and when asked to produces two town reads, but does not seem to want to back either of them up with election votes. he's also done zero scum hunting and was ready to vote based on the evidence of a cop claim he thought was fake. also, he keeps saying he needs to reread but has plainly been reading.

read it and then help me murder this guy

##lynch zeuzio

Dudesoft
always a dudesoft, never a soft dude.
6309
Hmm. I thought he came off as Town Vanilla, but seeing all this makes me wonder.
PlatinumAshes
I am now certain that you are not scum and are just town trying to play scum as hard as possible.
0
As much as it would benit me support Cave's prosecution of Zeuzio- sacrificing him as a distraction for myself- I have to be honest, and say that I disagree with Cave in his final conclusion.

Cave made me few very strong points, in my opinion, that mostly boil down to Zuezio acting timidly and defensively. (anime emoticons, absentness, passiveness)

I don't disagree with this argument. Zeuzio appears anxious in the way he posts. However, I don't agree that this anxiousness is a tell of him being werewolf.

Cave explains Zeuzio's passiveness by claiming Zeuzio is trying to 'stay clean', play it safe, if you will. I can agree with that, up to an extend. He also says, that Zeuzio's unwillingness to vote on the trending popular suspects is what renders him truely too passive to be a townie. I would argue the exact opposite: not making arguments for others' guilt or not theoryzing at all can be a tell, but quietly nodding your head and going 'jup, I think you guys are pretty much right, let's lynch this guy', would be the smartest thing to do for scum. Rather, I think the fact that Zeuzio not only acts passively but also doesn't dare cast his vote, points at the fact that he actually doesn't trust his own conclusions enough- probably because he had to be absent for personal reasons and is not following enough.


I have my own theory on who's likely to be scum at this point. It's risky for me to post it whole, but since I'm probably going to die anyway, I'll be posting it tonight.
Well I have had my doubts about my PlatinumAshes vote, but cave's argument against Zeuzio is pretty convincing - Zeuzio has been contradicting himself and not saying anything worth much. Besides, if I don't trust the scumdar of the person I'm electing sheriff then I probably shouldn't elect him sheriff, huh?

#Cancel Lynch #Lynch Zeuzio
CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
On sunny days, I go out walking
1142
Cave made me few very strong points, in my opinion, that mostly boil down to Zuezio acting timidly and defensively. (anime emoticons, absentness, passiveness)


well, he's also been acting internally inconsistent (doesn't believe cop claim, votes with cop claim. is pretty sure someone is town, refuses to elect them because WHAT IF THEY'RE SCUM. Constantly says he needs to reread, yet appears to have been reading very closely.)
Also, not having any scumtells and throwing out "this guy's town because, eh, well he just seems town!!" when pressured.

passively going along with a lynch is something he did at the start of the day, but no, it is not the smartest thing for scum to do, as it is lazy and will get them lynched. regardless, there is more than one way for scum to play, and theorizing on who the scumteam is based on who you think is playing the way you think scum should optimally play is silly because not only do people have different ideas of what optimal play is, but they usually don't even hold up to their own standards.

The excuse that he does not really trust his conclusions because he hasn't been reading is not really one that holds up when the fact that he has been posting, noticing small details, and made his last post after saying that he was going to reread, thus nullifying that defense.