Full Games List
Featured Games
New Games
Reviews
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Images Feedback Summary
Game Design Highlights
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engines
Engine Bulletins
What is Makerscore?
Past Events
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Post History
Chat
New to RMN?
Full Store List
RMN Music Pack (free)
NOMIC: GAME THREAD
Posts
Trihan
View playlists
CloseThat also helps prevent us losing points retroactively for all the s-filled posts we made up until this point ^_^
Shinan
4314
Okay so what number is it? 311?
Proposal 311.
The A$$ backwardz rule
The letter "s" (and it's uppercase variant "S") is taboo. Anyone caught using it in the body of a post in this thread suffers a penalty of 1 point per "s" (and "S") used. Up to a maximum of 10 points per post.
Sounds about right?
Proposal 311.
The A$$ backwardz rule
The letter "s" (and it's uppercase variant "S") is taboo. Anyone caught using it in the body of a post in this thread suffers a penalty of 1 point per "s" (and "S") used. Up to a maximum of 10 points per post.
Sounds about right?
TangledLion
618
Nay!SSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS
Shinan
4314
Rule 107 already adresses that.
107. No rule-change may take effect earlier than the moment of the completion of the vote that adopted it, even if its wording explicitly states otherwise. No rule-change may have retroactive application.
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
Fair enough. Let us know when it is up for voting.
TangledLion
618
See above for my vote, as I made a mistake and thought the voting had started already...
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
I vote yea as well. █ound█ like a bla█t.
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
Tangled, you can begin whenever you're ready. Your turn began when the preceeding turn ended. You don't have to wait for Trihan to update the OP.
TangledLion
618
Ok, $o... I have Realized $ince Maker$core izn't going away anytime $oon, I Might Az well Amend it too be u$eful.
Propo$al 311, Amendment to Propo$al 306
Player$ have a non-negative integer value called Maker$core. Maker$core may not be u$ed, gained or lo$t by any mean$ other than tho$e explicitly permitted by the rule$, and may not be $old or traded to other player$. From thi$ point on, Maker$core with a capital M will refer to the $trictly Nomic-ba$ed con$truct called Maker$core, wherea$ maker$core with a $mall m will refer to the maker$core value on RMN.
$hould thi$ propo$al pa$$, at the end of the turn in which it pa$$e$, the initial pool of Maker$core value$ will be determined by taking each player'$ RMN maker$core, dividing it by 100, and rounding it up to the neare$t 10. Once each player ha$ calculated their Maker$core allotment, they mu$t nominate one OTHER player to receive their Maker$core. $hould multiple player$ name the $ame other player, that player will receive the combined total of the Maker$core pool$. The allotment of Maker$core mu$t be completed before the next player can take their turn. EXAMPLE: LockeZ ha$ an allotment of 40 Maker$core (3143 / 100 = 31 rounded up) and meu$tru$ ha$ 10 (30 / 100 = 0.3 rounded up). LockeZ mu$t nominate one player other than him$elf to receive 40 Maker$core, and meu$tru$ mu$t nominate one player other than him$elf to receive 10. If both LockeZ and meu$tru$ choo$e the $ame per$on, that per$on will receive 50 Maker$core. Thi$ $equence will not repeat $hould thi$ propo$al be amended.
Point$ and Maker$core are tran$ferable at a rate of 5:1 (5 point$ -> 1 Maker$core, 5 Maker$core -> 1 point). A player wi$hing to tran$fer point$ to Maker$core or vice ver$a may only do $o during their own turn in the di$cu$$ion pha$e before voting begin$ for their propo$al, by clearly po$ting their intention to tran$fer re$ource$ and $tating the amount being lo$t/gained. The Game Ma$ter (Trihan) will confirm tran$fer$ at the end of each player'$ turn, after voting ha$ ended.
For Each propo$al Voted on A Player will be awarded 25 Maker$core for every other player with the $ame vote (E.G. If the player vote$ “Yay” He will receive 25 Maker$core for each other player that vote$ “Yay”).
Maker$core can be $pent to “Veto” propo$al$ that a u$er deem$ unfair. Thi$ may be done at a Rate of 200 Maker$core Per Player Voting For the propo$al in que$tion.
What do you all think?
Propo$al 311, Amendment to Propo$al 306
Player$ have a non-negative integer value called Maker$core. Maker$core may not be u$ed, gained or lo$t by any mean$ other than tho$e explicitly permitted by the rule$, and may not be $old or traded to other player$. From thi$ point on, Maker$core with a capital M will refer to the $trictly Nomic-ba$ed con$truct called Maker$core, wherea$ maker$core with a $mall m will refer to the maker$core value on RMN.
$hould thi$ propo$al pa$$, at the end of the turn in which it pa$$e$, the initial pool of Maker$core value$ will be determined by taking each player'$ RMN maker$core, dividing it by 100, and rounding it up to the neare$t 10. Once each player ha$ calculated their Maker$core allotment, they mu$t nominate one OTHER player to receive their Maker$core. $hould multiple player$ name the $ame other player, that player will receive the combined total of the Maker$core pool$. The allotment of Maker$core mu$t be completed before the next player can take their turn. EXAMPLE: LockeZ ha$ an allotment of 40 Maker$core (3143 / 100 = 31 rounded up) and meu$tru$ ha$ 10 (30 / 100 = 0.3 rounded up). LockeZ mu$t nominate one player other than him$elf to receive 40 Maker$core, and meu$tru$ mu$t nominate one player other than him$elf to receive 10. If both LockeZ and meu$tru$ choo$e the $ame per$on, that per$on will receive 50 Maker$core. Thi$ $equence will not repeat $hould thi$ propo$al be amended.
Point$ and Maker$core are tran$ferable at a rate of 5:1 (5 point$ -> 1 Maker$core, 5 Maker$core -> 1 point). A player wi$hing to tran$fer point$ to Maker$core or vice ver$a may only do $o during their own turn in the di$cu$$ion pha$e before voting begin$ for their propo$al, by clearly po$ting their intention to tran$fer re$ource$ and $tating the amount being lo$t/gained. The Game Ma$ter (Trihan) will confirm tran$fer$ at the end of each player'$ turn, after voting ha$ ended.
For Each propo$al Voted on A Player will be awarded 25 Maker$core for every other player with the $ame vote (E.G. If the player vote$ “Yay” He will receive 25 Maker$core for each other player that vote$ “Yay”).
Maker$core can be $pent to “Veto” propo$al$ that a u$er deem$ unfair. Thi$ may be done at a Rate of 200 Maker$core Per Player Voting For the propo$al in que$tion.
What do you all think?
Shinan
4314
Alright tho I think thith game hath thort of lotht all momentum. Tho what if TanledLion just maketh a propothal declaring a winner and we all vote for it...
