[POLL] WHY YOU NO NOMINATE FOR 2015 MISAOS YET, RMN?

Poll

Choose Your Scapegoat: - Results

RPG Maker MV (It’s just so bloody hot right now!)
13
18%
Gender and Race Topic (It’s hard not to get involved or look away.)
4
5%
It's all Kentona's fault!
22
31%
Blame WIP
30
43%

Posts

Pages: first prev 123456 last
Sooz
They told me I was mad when I said I was going to create a spidertable. Who’s laughing now!!!
5354
author=Darken
@Red this whole wording of ceremony and committee thing is making me feel like i should bring a fancy robe or something on post 2015

I said it before but idk, just don't make the categories about better/worst just make it about what stood out. Not metacritic's red to green system but rather a cute rainbow system.


So... write reviews of the games? We've already had that event.
CashmereCat
Self-proclaimed Puzzle Snob
11638
This thread makes me feel bad for not completing enough games, and not reviewing enough games. I could certainly organize my time a lot better to even get 1 review out a week. Then again, my life's passion isn't to become a reviewer, even though I think it benefits the community greatly.
No I'm making a comparison to prove a point. A lot of the categories just balloon into a winner takes all situation where of course goty gets best graphics/sound/story because it's the best game. Like what the fuck happened in 2012? Oh Star Stealing Prince stomped everything ok cool. But what had interesting use of RTP? what had the most innovative battle system? Most progressive? What has the worst case of never getting finished? The point of the awards becomes less about who da best, but how do you sum up the whole year?

If the categories become more specific, and tailored to what trends are happening then the awards feel like less of a pissing contest and just nice little highlights. It's better for a smaller community like this, there's no squable about "HOLY SHIT THAT GUY RIGGED THE VILLAIN WITH THE BEST HAIR AWARD BURN HIM AT THE STAKE" it's just in good fun.
This is why I always make sure to nominate and vote differently on each category unless a game does something better in all the other categories. I wouldn't be averse to just getting the GOTY nominees removed from the other categories, though.

We were looking at limiting the voting for games to only 2/3 categories per game. That is, not letting you nominate/vote the same game for all the categories.


Perhaps a good idea is to take the nominations that are made and then have a small group play them, then pick from them the best of that category and allow people to vote for those. So say each category has 10 nominations, then it'd get cut to 5 and those would be the ones that were voted on, with a limit of one game in 3 categories, tops.

It'd weed out games that don't fit (there were a few that got through last year that had nothing to do with the category and had to be removed) and help balance things so that no one game would sweep.
author=Liberty
We were looking at limiting the voting for games to only 2/3 categories per game. That is, not letting you nominate/vote the same game for all the categories.

This probably sounds flawed as heck, but what if a game can only be voted on in the top three-ish categories that it was nominated for? For example, a game gets nominated for 10 categories, but can only contend in the three categories that it was nominated for the most?

It's an idea to help prevent "sweepers" but I'm sure there would need to be a bit more to it.
CashmereCat
Self-proclaimed Puzzle Snob
11638
author=Darken
No I'm making a comparison to prove a point. A lot of the categories just balloon into a winner takes all situation where of course goty gets best graphics/sound/story because it's the best game. Like what the fuck happened in 2012? Oh Star Stealing Prince stomped everything ok cool. But what had interesting use of RTP? what had the most innovative battle system? Most progressive? What has the worst case of never getting finished? The point of the awards becomes less about who da best, but how do you sum up the whole year?

I think this is part of the reason why I created the Misaos thread, so that people who haven't played that many games won't just vote for that one popular game they've played, and that they'd feel more encouraged to play these other interesting games and realize that they should probably think more about who they vote for.

author=Liberty
We were looking at limiting the voting for games to only 2/3 categories per game. That is, not letting you nominate/vote the same game for all the categories.

That might be cool.

Edit:
author=SgtMettool
This probably sounds flawed as heck, but what if a game can only be voted on in the top three-ish categories that it was nominated for? For example, a game gets nominated for 10 categories, but can only contend in the three categories that it was nominated for the most?

It's an idea to help prevent "sweepers" but I'm sure there would need to be a bit more to it.

This is cool, too.
@Liberty

I think awards like Interface and Graphics are just so general that it's really easy to sweep with the GOTY. But taking the naming conventions to account, people aren't gonna take a traditional but qualitative game and put it in a Weirdest Game Award for instance. It's a bit more specific than an aspect of quality, it's a specific trait. The system you're proposing might help? But it sounds like the 2nd best game will get the graphics, because by proxy the graphics awards are the 2nd most voted choice for a popular GOTY choice.

Also some of those ideas sound like a lot of restrictions in place to either funnel a 1st place 2nd best 3rd best that's going to be spread in unrelated categories. So idk if that would entirely solve it.
CashmereCat
Self-proclaimed Puzzle Snob
11638
We've already added some nice categories like Most Puzzling Game, Most Horrific Game, Most Humorous Game and so on, so I think those specific categories you've been yearning for have been satisfied somewhat. We can add more next year. I think combining that with the "2-3 awards for a single game" rule and we might have ourselves a better system, if mods agree. "Might" being the key word.

But personally, I still enjoy the Misaos how they are. It's like Christmas - not everyone loves it.
nhubi
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
11099
author=NTC3
I might sound idealistic here, but I think that the right day for a Misao Committee would be the day when the number of "(Completed?) games with a download without a review" reaches zero, and not a moment sooner. Even then, we might wish to keep the original Misao with its silly name for those needing it, and have the Committee as a parallel, "Critic's Choice" event.

Never going to happen. Not just for the lack of reviews but because there are game pages with downloads that aren't actually games. There's a couple that are engines, and a few that are single instance competition entries without enough content to merit a review (and the dev doesn't want one anyway), and then there are all the ones whose downloads are no longer accessible due to the file lockers the dev used being defunct so they can never be downloaded or reviewed. There are hundreds in that last category.

Actually that gives me an idea, perhaps we should have a topic listing all the gamepages with a defunct download and a request for the members to see if they have a copy on their HD's so we can get one of the admins to up it to the RMN server and therefore keep it safe.

However back on topic (or closer to topic) I like the Misaos, the page that describes them makes it very clear this is just a bit of end of year fun and should never be taken in any other way. Even those that kvetch provide another source of that same fun, so it's a win-win as far as I'm concerned.
author=CashmereCat
We've already added some nice categories like Most Puzzling Game, Most Horrific Game, Most Humorous Game and so on, so I think those specific categories you've been yearning for have been satisfied somewhat. We can add more next year. I think combining that with the "2-3 awards for a single game" rule and we might have ourselves a better system, if mods agree. "Might" being the key word.


o ok I was not aware of this. I must have looked at the wrong nominate list then? But yeah more in that direction is good.
CashmereCat
Self-proclaimed Puzzle Snob
11638
Yeah we've got more categories like Most RTP Game, Best Game Title, "Lawsuit Waiting to Happen" Award (for most rips; this one would've been more relevant in past years where rips were more common, not so much now) and Best Game You Can Beat Under An Hour (which is probably going to share with GOTY because games nowadays tend to be a lot shorter than they used to. I like that fact though, because I tend to only have time for short games lately).
author=Sooz
HOME is popular on tumblr because it's a fixfic for OFF, which has a (deserved) huuuuuuge fandom. It isn't popular among RMN regulars because it honestly isn't very good or notable when decoupled from the fandom.

Yeah, I'm aware of that backstory. Still, I do think it's a little strange that the community's unconscious response has essentially been to ignore it completely and let Tumblr/other fans set the entire narrative on it.

@ nhubi: Thanks for the detailed reply. In fact, I think it might well be best to just move the engines, contest maps and such into their separate, "non-game download" category, so that they wouldn't distract from the real games that need reviewing.

As for defunct downloads, it's certainly a thing that needs to happen as well. I've already stumbled upon an example with U.S.G. ~A New Beginning~: a featured game, where not a single download appears to work. If there are hundreds of such examples, it certainly needs to get sorted out sooner rather than later.

In fact, can we make it an unofficial goal to clean these up and get the reviewed percentage to, say, 80%, by the website's 10th anniversary? That would be a nice round number to form an official Community Awards in a permanent, agreed-upon capacity, one that would also decide on both the "inside" categories we have for fun,and the "professional" categories like interface, while Misaos would be more about the categories everyone can have a reasonably informed opinion about.
Sooz
They told me I was mad when I said I was going to create a spidertable. Who’s laughing now!!!
5354
author=NTC3
Yeah, I'm aware of that backstory. Still, I do think it's a little strange that the community's unconscious response has essentially been to ignore it completely and let Tumblr/other fans set the entire narrative on it.


I think the problem is threefold: One, it's just kind of an annoying game to play, especially if you're not a fan; two, there are a few negative reviews, but it'll be hard getting enough in to make a dent on all the fives; three, the creator gets butthurt at negative crit, which is a pain.

So it's a lot more convenient to just let the tumblrites have their one darling and ignore them.

In fact, can we make it an unofficial goal to clean these up and get the reviewed percentage to, say, 80%, by the website's 10th anniversary? That would be a nice round number to form an official Community Awards in a permanent, agreed-upon capacity, one that would also decide on both the "inside" categories we have for fun,and the "professional" categories like interface, while Misaos would be more about the categories everyone can have a reasonably informed opinion about.


That's a lot of reviews.
nhubi
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
11099
NTC I can help you with USG, the gamejolt page moved.

USG

In regard to the changing of categories, I'm not sure the upside is worth the work for the admins. I think we just aim for a good percentage, and 80% was about what I was thinking and just try to keep it there.

There are always going to be pages that can't be reviewed for a number of reasons, but yes I would like to reduce the number of defunct ones.

Sooz
That's a lot of reviews


About 500 given the current figures, but of course that will continue to increase as games are added. it's high but not unreachable.
@NTC:
Start reviewing, then. We've put a decent dent in the numbers since we started doing review drives but it's gonna be a long while before we catch up the 80% of games reviewed. Unless we drop our review standards which just ain't gonna happen.
nhubi
Liberté, égalité, fraternité
11099
Nor should we, the standards we have a flexible enough for anyone, and hardly onerous.

Though Lib do you want to contact our Lord and ask him to link the correct USG gamejolt page to the one on the USG gamepage? Or actually up a version stored here. Since Hima hasn't posted in about 2 years I'm assuming the dev is AWOL.

That'll be one less of the defuncts to list.
I shall check with Our Lord and Saviour. ;p

E: Done. He was in a good mood, it seems.

For the record, if you find a game that has a broken link and you know that the creator posted another version online, PM the game page and the link to the other download to me and I'll patch it through. If you find a broken link and have a copy of the game, send it to me and I'll see it fixed up (going under the assumption that if they added a download to the site they mean for there to be a version here for people to play.)
@nhubi: Thanks! I'll probably focus more on the unreviewed games for now (unless it's one of the games I promised to review to someone sometime), but this is helpful nevertheless.

@Liberty: Sure, I will. I have been a lot busier these past two months than I expected, but things ought to be getting better now. I'll also focus more on demos (which make up a great proportion of unreviewed games anyway) to be able to release them faster, without budging on the standards. I do need to fix up my laptop first, though: it's began crashing really frequently now, and I don't want to take any chances when playing through stuff.

@Sated: Yeah, I don't know what the deal was with those typo-ridden reviews on games like Aria's Story slipping past Soli, but it certainly wasn't a good sign. Then, again, at least we are not TVT with its 400 word maximum, which only about 15-25% of writers manage to use effectively.

Pages: first prev 123456 last