New account registration is temporarily disabled.

2021 MISAOS - THOUGHTS, IDEAS, PLANS

Posts

Sooz
They told me I was mad when I said I was going to create a spidertable. Who’s laughing now!!!
5354
I'm personally not super happy about including commercial games for regular misao categories for reasons that are not entirely objective or rational, but I'll agree that a "best commercial game" would be a nice inclusion!

Especially these days, when it's hard as hell to get any kind of attention in the commercial indie sphere.
OldPat
OrudoPatto, kisama!
5017
I wouldn't be scared of doing review events more than once throughout the year instead of the last two months like "Oh shit, the Misao are coming oh shit let's review oh shit", or just the first two, or just the Summer.

Review events should be periodical, maybe with a little "twist" in the event itself. Like maybe "who reviews the most adventure games", or "who reviews the most games that came out this month" (in order to also categorize them and make each and every one of these events stand out and make them all useful for the upcoming Misao). I don't friggin know but the possibilities are potentially endless. Constant incentives.

They don't even have to be "full blown" events. What about a "sidequests-like" kinda thing? Sidequests were a neat idea. If they make a return for things like reviews and all, that would be great.

Also, we (you guys) focused a lot on how to make people play the thousands, hundreds of games that gets uploaded on RMN each month. What about starting to invest in events or ideas to make the actual developers "get out there" more?

A lot of great games gets uploaded in here and go by unnoticed, but that's also because most devs just throw them in here and then disappear, or do not spend enough time in here being social/being present to properly make their games stand out.

What about events aimed at making the developers go a bit more on the promotion sides of thing? Just a tiny bit. Events should also allow the developers to improve and also explore new, foreign territories, while still keeping the thing fun and all while engaging with the community.

Even stuff such as "Make a cover about your game event" or "Make a trailer about your game event" could help the developers getting out there more and making their games stand out more. It's also that kind of material that's easier to digest for other people, more than playing the actual game. So it would fit with Cap's previous idea (of people being less scared of voting without having played the game) and also, maybe, allow the developers to make stuff that could drag other potential players in. All stuff that gets "centralized" in said event, so it also becomes some kind of index of "trailers/covers/artworks/whatever of new games coming out/that came out".

Also I'm sure that others already suggested this thousands of times already but here goes.
What about a "1st position, 2nd position, 3rd position" kinda thing for Misaos? So that more games gets visibility, not just the winner.

Also yeah, I read about nominations not being there in the past and just votes being there. I actually wouldn't mind that kind of system.
Creating a "two steps to Misaos" kinda thing makes people even more lazy. But if the system is as straightforward as "just cast a vote", more will likely come and cast their vote, because it is more straightforward. They'll be more willing to do that than going through "first nominate, then, when January hits, cast a vote". We live in an era where people prefer to just put a "like", or an emoji, on something, to show appreciation, instead of going through elaborate steps.

I'm all for an off-site kinda thing as well, actually!

Random ideas, you probably just discussed most of these already.

Sooz
They told me I was mad when I said I was going to create a spidertable. Who’s laughing now!!!
5354
author=OldPat
Even stuff such as "Make a cover about your game event" or "Make a trailer about your game event" could help the developers getting out there more and making their games stand out more.


I dig this idea. It's really hard as a dev to know how to advertise your game here, since you're not allowed to make posts or anything, so it's all based on game page, which is super separate from the community area.

IDK if it'll attract a lot of new devs that didn't interact before, but it sounds fun at least! :B

What about a "1st position, 2nd position, 3rd position" kinda thing for Misaos? So that more games gets visibility, not just the winner.


LOVE THIS.
author=Liberty
I mean, some of the games nominated in other categories came from events. They just didn't get nominated in that specific category.


IIRC we cut out nominating people/teams for Misaos because some people felt left out/ignored/etc. It's the same reason we got rid of the Wisaos - because it left bad feelings among members. The fact that people don't have the ability to nominate themselves or get nominated by others for such categories can be a bit too personal for some, so it's best to keep the focus on the games themselves instead of the devs creating them. That way it's about the 'product' and the quality of that. Defining peoples' quality only leads to issues.
author=Marrend
I'm not sure about "Best Event Team" either, to be honest. Like, okay, maybe I haven't been paying too much attention, but, putting together a team is a really rare thing on this site. Especially for events, I feel. Like, I think that's why the McBacon jams of old started being a thing. To get people to work together, and maybe even expand their gammak capacities while they were at it.

Ok, fair enough, no event team based misao, but we still need another RMN event misao. Can we at least agree for you guys to post a mandatory reminder to on the event page to nominate best event game? There's still a big disconnect between event participants and misao nominations. Posting a reminder on the event page, maybe even a playlist to the gamepages, so participates can vote on best event game more easily will fix this. I'd be more than happy to post this reminder myself, but I don't have the current forum privileges to do this - If you guys gave me a shot, I'd be more than happy to fix this everytime an RMN event game jam is posted.

author=16bitking
I'm certain somebody's said this before, but I think consideration should definitely be given to allowing commercial games to be viable for Misaos, or if not for at least a single category (perhaps "best commercial game"?). I get the freeware angle and how it allows for all nominees to be played without financial burden, but I also think that places restrictions on nominations which can end up being extremely frustrating, and often leads to amazing games being completely overlooked simply because they're commercial.
I'd argue commercial games, in fact, are significantly harder to get people to play in the first place, so a little bit of recognition on RMN, I think, would be pretty nice.

+1 I'm for this, Darken mentioned this as well in a previous year. I want to know why we can't do this and if there's a way we can compromise this category. Please let me know.

author=OldPat
What about a "1st position, 2nd position, 3rd position" kinda thing for Misaos? So that more games gets visibility, not just the winner.

+1 I mentioned this idea last year as well. I'm gonna wait till the 2020 results are posted before discussing it any further.

author=OldPat
Even stuff such as "Make a cover about your game event" or "Make a trailer about your game event" could help the developers getting out there more and making their games stand out more. It's also that kind of material that's easier to digest for other people, more than playing the actual game.
+1 I'm 100% behind this ideas as well. I would've loved to see stuff like Amort and Weird and Unfortunate get fan art game covers or something - I'd probably participate in this event as well. I'm doing those silly fake video game magazine ads anyways.
What about going one step further? We could revive/start an RPG Maker E-Zine, and invite people to write articles about their games, or submit a review of another game.
Why do Misao nominations/voting need to happen in December/January?

If people are so busy during the holidays, why not make them like 2021/2022 Misaos, running about games released from July to June?
Sooz
They told me I was mad when I said I was going to create a spidertable. Who’s laughing now!!!
5354
I assumed it was for ease of allowing/disallowing nominations, but that's probably fairly easy to fix. I assume. I am bad with computers.

Edit:
Snexecutive
Mainly because they've been start of the year things since they began way back in the hey day of RM.


We have done the 'advertise yourself' events before. They never really get any traction. The amount of people who take part tend to be quite small, sadly, but I'm down to give it another shot this year.

The problem with Commercial games is that the way the form is set up you can't differentiate between Commercial and non-commercial. Also, the site only 'reads' demos, full games and non-demo games. Most Commercial games are not going to be adding a full game to the site, since our rules state that we don't allow downloads that are locked from free access and play - thus they'd have to add instead a demo and I don't think many bother - they just throw a link to their game on steam or itch in the description and leave it at that.


I would love to hire someone to fix a few things about the game pages - allow for a new button for voting, yes, but also have another button - one for commercial downloads/linkage. I want to keep the 'free to download' aspect of the site in tact but having a button that is just for commercial games in prominence so they can link to an external purchase in addition to having an internal download button would be great. Also, image gallery changes.

;.;


Anyway, I'm about to do the round up. See you shortly!
Sooz
They told me I was mad when I said I was going to create a spidertable. Who’s laughing now!!!
5354
author=Liberty
The problem with Commercial games is that the way the form is set up you can't differentiate between Commercial and non-commercial.


I mean we've already amply seen that a lot of people don't give a shit whether a thing belongs in an award category in the first place, so maybe force LBR to clean up the nominations once in a while and make sure that, say, Po-Faced Final Fantasy Fangame didn't get put into Trippiest or Punniest because people decided to just CLICK ALL THE CATEGORIES MY FAVORITE GAME IS THE ALPHA AND THE OMEGA!!!!
You can't 'clean up' nominations.
author=Liberty
The problem with Commercial games is that the way the form is set up you can't differentiate between Commercial and non-commercial.
isn't there a commercial tag for it? or do you mean that people are not using that tag for their commercial games?

also, i think you can put a download link that redirect to steam or itch, rave heart does that.
It does have a demo link in the downloads, though that should be the main page link, not hidden like it is. As long as there IS a link to a demo, though.


Oh, yeah, and results are out~
https://rpgmaker.net/forums/topics/25653/
Sooz
They told me I was mad when I said I was going to create a spidertable. Who’s laughing now!!!
5354
author=Liberty
You can't 'clean up' nominations.


Then y'all need to make that possible because that shit is downright ludicrous.
I've said this for a couple years now and I know it's not all that popular, but I think both of the main problems of 1) big, notable games getting nominated in every category and 2) categories not having enough entrants... would be solved by cutting down on the number of categories in general.

There just aren't many non-event games on the site that more than handful of active users can say they've played in a given year. If there are really under a dozen notable games coming out each year, it doesn't make sense to have more categories than that.

(other stuff: RMN's rating/review system definitely makes it cumbersome to nominate stuff, especially after the fact. I'd love to see, for example, a list of games that I've played this year. Or a way to fill out a nomination ballot by category, vs needing to go to each individual page to nominate)

(and on the "hire someone to fix stuff" front, is there no active web dev currently on staff? I definitely think there would be people in the community willing to volunteer for this sort of stuff, without having to dip into the server fund)
Then y'all need to make that possible because that shit is downright ludicrous.

(and on the "hire someone to fix stuff" front, is there no active web dev currently on staff? I definitely think there would be people in the community willing to volunteer for this sort of stuff, without having to dip into the server fund)

Ultimately I feel it really does come down to finding a way of getting new features added to RMN itself. Or else we'll end up in the same cycle of "discuss how to improve the site but don't change anything because we can't" that we've been stuck in for a few years now. I know I probably sound naive for it and I know we can't just snap a finger and get a coder on board, but I'm feeling like it's about time to explore that option.
A lot of the site stuff is intertwined with each other. If you edit one thing it'll have effects on a ton of other stuff. Even stuff like what people can and cannot access has a lot of connections to a bunch of other areas of the site and can cause upset if messed around with too much. Hell, the front page breaks if I accidentally choose Feature Game instead of Game as a category choice when it comes to featured games, even though it woud make sense to allow for that as an option too, but apparently that links to something else to do with Featured games so using it ... well, you get the idea. orz

I wouldn't want to let a bunch of people who don't know it in to tinker unless we had a duplicate site they could fuck around on or something and even then we'd have to vet them to make sure they're not compromising the security of the site, or accidentally an everything. >.<;


In that vein I'd rather hire someone outside who has their professional values to commit to and don't have to deal with the community (and thus can't get butthurt, leave the job half done, cause issues, do power plays, etc) because it seems the safest option. They'd get paid for the headache. The cost, though... not sure we could afford something like that.
author=Liberty
The cost, though... not sure we could afford something like that.


if you can figure out the ballpark figure in terms of the cost, we'd probably be willing to pitch in.
Sooz
They told me I was mad when I said I was going to create a spidertable. Who’s laughing now!!!
5354
author=Liberty
I wouldn't want to let a bunch of people who don't know it in to tinker unless we had a duplicate site they could fuck around on or something and even then we'd have to vet them to make sure they're not compromising the security of the site, or accidentally an everything. >.<;


That is standard operating procedure for website design bro

Also yeah crowdfund that shit. There's plenty of us who would like to see RMN join the modern internet (and it'd improve QoL for mods and users in general!) Really it'd probably be worse to leave it the way it is.
author=Liberty
In that vein I'd rather hire someone outside who has their professional values to commit to and don't have to deal with the community (and thus can't get butthurt, leave the job half done, cause issues, do power plays, etc) because it seems the safest option. They'd get paid for the headache. The cost, though... not sure we could afford something like that.
This is 100% valid, relying on volunteers sucks. But it still might be asking around -- people are a lot more professional once paid, and people in the community are probably willing to work for lower than market rate.
Marrend
Guardian of the Description Thread
21806
I could see how, with the current structure of RMN, that allowing commercial games to be nominated for one category, they would need to be able to be nominated for all categories. I'm not saying this is a good or bad thing, as I can see the argument for wanting to be able to nominate commercial games, even if only demos can be provided on RMN's server.