WHAT ARE YOU THINKING ABOUT RIGHT NOW?

That fantasy of having sex in a church is appealing for me. Also nunplay.

bahleted

Wow, I've never seen a jumping spider before.

My roommates used to fuck in my room a lot and I never made a fuss, why wouldn't Jesus be cool with people fucking in his house? I bet he'd only be irritated that i was using a condom since that goes against the installation instructions for a new life, but idk if he would send me to hell. I don't think he would he seems like a cool guy who doesn't give a shit about lots of things.

I geddit.

stan lee is cool

author=Darken
I actually don't see a problem with the article. It sums up as best it can about how RPGmaker came to be and how the problem isn't the engine just the people submitting crappy games that sully the brand. It seems more aimed at potential creators than potential players and he did consult Nessiah. I'm surprised he even brought up the Don Miguel thing and the progression and the mistakes of the RM series.

He's actually smart to reference Yume Nikki and OFF and allude to the Undertale influence because thats the only thing people truly recognize from RPGMaker as good examples. If A Blurred Line, Romancing Walker, Love and War were mentioned people are gonna go ???? and look at the screenshots and exclaim "wow this does not appeal to my 2017 asethetic." Maybe I'm cynical but it just isn't as simple as directing people to the top games at RMN. There needs to be something new and fresh and word of mouthy to drive people to the promised aremen games, not a fucking stray PC gamer article going YO I HEARD AVEYOND WAS THE SHIZ.

People really do see what they want to see. I looked kind of clumsily at this post and somewhere in it saw "panty drop". I've read this whole post once before without a problem.

I think it was "stray" and "top" that did it.

I’ll admit, the pickle jar was a nice touch, lol. At least LockeZ was kind enough to tell him how long he was gone for instead of just an arbitrary guess.

Actually, speaking of that – I have a question to ask: when a member gets banned from the site for a certain infraction committed – is there a certain time limit told to the user about how long they’re banned for, or is it still just a simple, straight up ban message like it's always been? It’s been a while since I was last banned on here, so I’m not quite sure if things have changed or not since then…

Maybe we wouldn’t have so many users try to ban evade and make secondary accounts on here if they were just told a rough estimate about how long they’re banned for. I mean, I can see some of the more extreme cases where you can just simply put down a message that they’re banned indefinitely until then, but I wonder if that would stop some of these users from digging an even more deeper hole for themselves, because some of these guys could always end up turning it around someday, or might even have some hidden potential that we don't know of as of yet, or maybe even make a name for themselves on here after they've realized their past mistakes and what they have done in due time.

Either way, food for thought.

Well, at least the last time that I was banned before eventually coming back here Kentona was at least kind enough to tell me on IRC, and even posted it under my usertitle at the time, that I was allowed to come back in two months. Before that, I basically had the exact same “banne” message as you, Corfaisus…no expiration date and all.

Did they at least give you a message below about why you were banned on that page? I think I remember during the WIP administration years that at least there would be a reason typed below about why you were banned in the first place, in case it wasn’t so obvious. Do they still do something like that?