PHOENIX MAFIA: ONLINE TURNABOUT

Get away with it? Didn't he get handed over to the assassin in that game....?

Commenting to let people know I'm here...watching...always watching.

I have personally never watched Phoenix Wright. I'm actuallly basing my approach on Perry Mason. I only said that because I thought it would be funny.

Who would you lynch if you were basing your vote on stuff people have said today, and not yellow magic fear

Based off the Suikoden mafia game anyway

Of course, what people say on Day 1 tends to not be so useful until later days, so... hm.

Actually, I agree with LockeZ' line of thinking. I believe Jeroen_Sol hosted a game in which YellowMagic was so convincing, nobody guessed he was scum. Still, if we lynched people on the premise that they played previous games one kind of way, they'd essentially be blackballed from all games, being lynched on day one, and I don't think that's fair.

Now, to a new matter, and I think I have a legitimate case now.

I ##OBJECT to Cave_Dog_Is_Back's statement "I will use my gun power, but on who? (yellow magic)"

Firstly, Caveman appears to adamant in his badgering of Yellow Magic. There is no evidence as yet linking Yellow Magic to this crime, making Caveman's testimony prejudicial.

Secondly, his assertion that he has "gun power" makes him a possible candidate for a possible vigilante or scum. He could be lying, acting in his erratic manner, but my past experience with him tells me that there is always a grain of truth in his absurd statements.

Thirdly, it's "whom", not "who".

Well, there's a difference between going after someone exclusively on a meta argument, and going after someone who's actually behaved suspiciously and using a meta argument to support the position. Cave has claimed to have a weapon with kill ability. We know that such people are either mafia or vigilante. Don't you think such a claim is deserving of scrutiny?

I'm all for this strategy, because I've yet to see it backfire.
#nolynch

There's no evidence, no backing, no reason beyond meta-game assumptions based on play styles in previous games (which can change and evolve), and all it'll do is get us a random jailed Town.
The two arguments for and against #nolynching are basically hot air using the exact same points in their own defense. Today is a day of rest. Let's quibble all we want until time runs out, but no one is likely to give themselves up or anything gained until we see some night action reports tomorrow.
This is my stance for now.

If I mislynch, I lose my powers for the next day/night phase. I'm not very afraid of that this early in the game and I don't think you should be either. Dudsoft raises good points, but I frankly feel he's drawn the wrong conclusion (I don't want to say wrong because he's really not and wrong is really an unfair word in any case.). I don't think nolynch is a good idea in any case. As long as we're lynching, we might lynch an innocent victim or we might lynch a killer. If we're not lynching, we're definitely not going to lynch a killer. And as LockeZ pointed out, they get a nightkill and will use it regardless of what they do. Rolling the dice and taking a chance is better than doing nothing. Cave lynches and he's innocent, I lose my powers for a day/night phase. Meh. I'm trying to find the killers. We'll see, either way.

Also, just to address your spurious flavor attack on my illustrious person, my dear Puddor, I'm afraid your translation is marred by your lack of understanding of musical terms. Klavier is NOT German for piano. It is merely an approximation. Klavier is German for "keyboard"! Piano is Italian for "soft"! Your honor, I move that Puddor's claims against my person be stricken from the record! It is an erroneous and facetious attempt at slandering and debasing a representative of the courts.