Full Games List
Featured Games
New Games
Reviews
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Images Feedback Summary
Game Design Highlights
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engines
Engine Bulletins
What is Makerscore?
Past Events
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Chat
New to RMN?
Full Store List
RMN Music Pack (free)
Profile
Locker
Play ListsMCBICK'S PROFILE
McBick
1339
CloseSearch
Filter
All
Game Pages
User Statuses
[RM2k3] Need help with step counter!
Just tried that exact event and when I hold the directional key it sometimes skips a step.
Edit: I need an exact step counter because every time you move or do an action a turn passes in game which triggers other events to move/action.
Edit: I need an exact step counter because every time you move or do an action a turn passes in game which triggers other events to move/action.
[RM2k3] Need help with step counter!
Before you ask, yes I have looked at all the tutorials and none of them are accurate enough for my game. I need a 100% accurate step counter. I tried using the hero's xy values, but it would either skip a step when holding a direction key or add to many steps to the counter.
[Poll] 16-Bit(Pixel Graphics) VS HD
@sooz
I said they PROBABLY aren't targeted to you. Again you just say their bad and give no reason which would make it seem like your basing that off your opinion alone, I am not saying that you are. Please don't bring this up again because I have never read or even seen the movie, so I wouldn't be able to discuss this further.
I don't know where you see that I describe what good is and you even ask me what my definition is yet say I keep switching the definition. I have been constantly saying "good" is different to each person. My definition of what good would mean is satisfaction in something.
I said they PROBABLY aren't targeted to you. Again you just say their bad and give no reason which would make it seem like your basing that off your opinion alone, I am not saying that you are. Please don't bring this up again because I have never read or even seen the movie, so I wouldn't be able to discuss this further.
I don't know where you see that I describe what good is and you even ask me what my definition is yet say I keep switching the definition. I have been constantly saying "good" is different to each person. My definition of what good would mean is satisfaction in something.
[Poll] 16-Bit(Pixel Graphics) VS HD
@sooz
I was talking about the "new super mario bros" series which there are at least 5 of if not more and they are all just rehashes.
Just because I look at something objectively doesn't mean I can't discuss the good and the bad of it. It allows me to look at it from every ones point of view instead of dismissing anyone because it goes against what I think. Again your using your opinion as fact. Not only that, but your using books that probably aren't targeted for you either. That's like me saying COD sucks because I hate first person shooters.
@Liberty
What if you could have the exact gameplay, but could play it in 16-Bit or HD?
I was talking about the "new super mario bros" series which there are at least 5 of if not more and they are all just rehashes.
Just because I look at something objectively doesn't mean I can't discuss the good and the bad of it. It allows me to look at it from every ones point of view instead of dismissing anyone because it goes against what I think. Again your using your opinion as fact. Not only that, but your using books that probably aren't targeted for you either. That's like me saying COD sucks because I hate first person shooters.
@Liberty
What if you could have the exact gameplay, but could play it in 16-Bit or HD?
[Poll] 16-Bit(Pixel Graphics) VS HD
Like I said earlier if a game is good or bad is subjective. You might think V is better and I might think IV is, but that doesn't mean one is the better. I also did not say that sales alone determines if a game is good or not. To clarify what I meant was that by looking at the sales of a game you can get an idea of if the game is good or bad. If that game has outsold every other game of its genre by a large margin then chances are its a good game. There is no way to prove a game is good or bad. If you associate good with what the majority plays then you can use sales of a game to help you assess if it will be a good game or not. Ultimately it will be different for every person.
Edit: On another note I'm amazed no one has picked HD yet. Yes I picked 16-Bit I love me some nostalgia.
Edit: On another note I'm amazed no one has picked HD yet. Yes I picked 16-Bit I love me some nostalgia.
[Poll] 16-Bit(Pixel Graphics) VS HD
author=TravioA game can have similar or even exact mechanics of other games especially if they are made by the same people. That doesn't mean the game is bad. Mario for example hasn't changed much over the years and many Mario titles are virtually the same games with different lay outs, but many people would agree it is a fun game. It seems to me that you are just saying their bad because you alone think they are. If a game is good or bad is subjective, but if you look at the amount of people who buy/play your games you can get an idea if a game is bad or not. Also if a company continued to sell bad games they would lose their reputation and wouldn't be selling many games. There is a reason for their high reputation.author=McBickThere's a flaw in your logic here. Sometimes their games sell just because of the name of the company or a previous title being good. That doesn't mean the games are good - there's a large market of people who want the beige FPS war simulators, so there's companies that do nothing but put out the same game, over and over, with ever so slight differences. And they make money hand over foot not because of the quality, but they're putting out something for a specific market who's shown to repeatedly pay for that content (the same market that's willing to shell out an extra 50% of a game's cost to get all the extra DLC content that the company uses to fill the sales gap until the next release comes out). A game selling does not make it good; a game can sell merely on the reputation of a company or on the merits of a previous game, and the game turns out to be shit.
@Sooz
They are major developers because their games sell. If their games weren't good they wouldn't sell.
[Poll] 16-Bit(Pixel Graphics) VS HD
I still don't understand how you interpret that as me being confused with 2d and 3d because 16-Bit is 2D. Also I even say they use HD where your quoting me, so why would you think I forgot?
[Poll] 16-Bit(Pixel Graphics) VS HD
@Lockez
I'm not sure if your trolling or not, but if you aren't then you should know there is such a thing as HD 2D games. Also handheld games have limitations, such as low resolution meaning no HD graphics.
@Sooz
They are major developers because their games sell. If their games weren't good they wouldn't sell.
I'm not sure if your trolling or not, but if you aren't then you should know there is such a thing as HD 2D games. Also handheld games have limitations, such as low resolution meaning no HD graphics.
@Sooz
They are major developers because their games sell. If their games weren't good they wouldn't sell.
[Poll] 16-Bit(Pixel Graphics) VS HD
[Poll] 16-Bit(Pixel Graphics) VS HD
I've yet to meet someone who hasn't grown up with 16-Bit games that actually prefers or even likes them, not saying they don't like the game, but rather the graphics are a turn off. I think its all about nostalgia. I think its primitive, similar to a 1950s TV. I don't really understand why anyone would want lesser graphics. Just to clarify I am not talking about gameplay, but graphics alone. Wouldn't you rather play "Zelda: A Link to the Past" with HD graphics than play the original? I know I would.
Games - Tester
Games - Other
