THEBADMAN'S PROFILE

I agree with the gameplay score, but the humour was enjoyable.

Sated is the usual arrogant (as always).
Does he rant here because he wrote a similar (bad) review for Lunar Wish, and was criticized for the same thing?

The answer is probably "YES".
Don't expect too much from a guy that hates cats. -.-"

@Ronove:
Love the artwork. :)

This review is bad, very bad, probably one of the worst I've ever read, and I've read several ones.
The reviewer doesn't talk about anything at all (besides difficulty) which is a shame, because this game certainly has more merits than flaws.

Since when a game gets reviewed speaking only about its difficulty?
Are we joking here or what? This is beyond ridiculous.

Difficulty is subjective because it depends on your experience in playing games, so you can't base a review only about this argument.
----
"From my point of view (and also that of many others), the game itself isn't that hard at all."

Don't want to sound harsh (but I will say it anyway), "if you're a noob at rpgs and you can't even play an RM game then you should also avoid to review it."

Reviews rushed and done by frustrated haters or incompetents players like this one gave me some nerves.

Sorry for the outburst but some things "need" to be said.

This is "how a review should be done", pointing up every single aspect of the game.
Good work.

You talk about clichè storylines and character design Sated, and then (from your profile) you're the first one to admit that you are the worst storyteller and character designer ever.

You can't write a good review based on characterization if you have no idea of what characterization really is (it's something that you can't seem to do right, then your point of view may be somehow twisted).

So now what are we discussing here?. I'm sorry but this review doesn't make any sense. This still looks like an "I don't like it that's why it sucks" more than a real and full review.