Full Games List
Featured Games
New Games
Reviews
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Images Feedback Summary
Game Design Highlights
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engines
Engine Bulletins
What is Makerscore?
Past Events
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Post History
Chat
New to RMN?
Full Store List
RMN Music Pack (free)
[MAFIA] ANIME WAIFU BATTLE ROYALE! =+= FINISHED =+=
Posts
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
Jeroen_Sol
View playlists
CloseWait, what's this about grey zone?
I didn't send in a move command, I just left it, but yeah, the others sent in a command so I realise now I made a mistake, sowwie!
Jeroen_Sol
Wait, what's this about grey zone?
Day 0, Liberty made it explicit that we weren't to stay in grey zone. It was also made clear that we could stay in any other zone we choose. Since Liberty was forcing forcing us to leave grey zone and since she isn't forcing us to move from any other zone, it's clear the forced move rule only applies to grey zone.
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
No Frogge, it's the exact opposite. If a kill happens somewhere other than Bart's location, it becomes much less likely for Bart to be the SK.
Natook
1000
nvm, i reread what was going on, i'm up to speed now.
god my reading comprehension skills are NOT good today
god my reading comprehension skills are NOT good today
author=Jeroen_Sol
No Frogge, it's the exact opposite. If a kill happens somewhere other than Bart's location, it becomes much less likely for Bart to be the SK.
Oh nvm, I'm dumb and forgot about that detail.
In that case, could bart trick us that he is not SK by using a non zone limited weapon? And the SK could just not kill anyone tonight so we'll all suspect bart and all lynch him tomorrow.
Bart_Sol
852
author=Jeroen_Sol
Of course. I'm pretty sure most of us had already considered that. But if you were innocent, the correct course of action would have been to not say anything about that, in hopes of the SK not thinking about that.
I don't think anyone would be so stupid as to not come up with that.
I have something of an idea how I might be able to make it less likely that I am the SK, but I'd rather not say it out loud and instead would hope that I could tell a small amount of people (at least 2, so to avoid the possibilty that only the SK learns) what my idea is in private, in order to reduce the chances of the SK learning it.
Irog
4858
Liberty doesn't force players to move. I stayed in the same sector because I mp her telling I was staying. The forced move only apply if you don't mp her with your destination.
Bart_Sol
852
Wait... I just realised that doesn't work because people can only partner with one new person each day >.<
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
Even if Bart turns out not to be the SK, and the real SK decides to frame him by not killing anyone, Bart still has to die for the rest of us to win, so there still are no downsides to the plan.
Besides, the end result will be the same. The SK would sacrifice a NK to force a mislynch, meaning we'll have the same amount of NK's per day we can hunt the SK left.
Besides, the end result will be the same. The SK would sacrifice a NK to force a mislynch, meaning we'll have the same amount of NK's per day we can hunt the SK left.
Grey zone has weird happenings. Although Libs told us we could go to grey zone as an action after day 0, it seemingly results in RNG and shenanigans.
Natook
1000
author=Bart_Sol
Wait... I just realised that doesn't work because people can only partner with one new person each day >.<
you can tell me here, let's all just promise to look away
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
...Do we really need to add a clause to the "No OOT communication" rule that disallows encrypted communication in thread?
I'll just assume I do.
Someone has something they want to say to only a small number of people. But literally every communication is monitored. what do they do?
First, they take a phrase, and code it. Then, they pass it publicly to the person who they want to read it. THAT person ALSO codes THAT coded message with their own code.
Now, they send THAT double encoded message back (also in public).
Person 1 then DECODES that coded message with their own code. Send it
And now, when person 2 decodes it, it's the complete message.
Think of it like a treasure chest with two locks on it.
person 1 locks, person 2 locks, then person one unlocks, and person 2 unlocks.
Someone has something they want to say to only a small number of people. But literally every communication is monitored. what do they do?
First, they take a phrase, and code it. Then, they pass it publicly to the person who they want to read it. THAT person ALSO codes THAT coded message with their own code.
Now, they send THAT double encoded message back (also in public).
Person 1 then DECODES that coded message with their own code. Send it
And now, when person 2 decodes it, it's the complete message.
Think of it like a treasure chest with two locks on it.
person 1 locks, person 2 locks, then person one unlocks, and person 2 unlocks.
author=Jeroen_Sol
...Do we really need to add a clause to the "No OOT communication" rule that disallows encrypted communication in thread?
Well geez, I think that certainly flies under the rules! It's all completely in public!
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
This assumes that the encryption algorithms are commutative. if they're not, this double lock thing will not work.
