KEL'S PROFILE

It's no problem, you've got a pretty good Revive the Dead game going on there.

Going to be swamped with stuff the rest of the night though, so I won't start playing Seraphic Blue until tomorrow. Can I finish this mammoth game in a few days while juggling work (starting tomorrow) and making my own game?

Time shall tell.

Even better then, but if their relationship was ongoing at the time of that article, it still wouldn't really equal backlash since it was a big list of indie games at the time, and hers had gotten coverage beforehand, so it makes sense for it to be mentioned. (no matter how bad it is)

The journalist in question actually did speak favorably about Quinn's game, but it was a small amount of praise that was part of an article that showcased many different indie games at the time.

Looks like there's quite the skill selection.

author=Liberty
Anyway, this is getting off the subject of GG and into other territory. So, back to the subject at hand:
GamerGate should burn in a fire because nothing is going to come from a movement that was started for the sole purpose of attacking a person instead of an ideal.

I think this is pretty much all that needs to be said on the subject of GG honestly. That's the roots of so called "defending journalism", and with a name that makes no sense (Watergate Scandal happened at Watergate) those that actually want a less biased media shouldn't have jumped onto a burning ship.

Also, anyone who listens to a woman's problems and makes it about how they aren't like the men she's describing, or that they haven't seen it, really need to take a moment and reflect why that's not the best way to go about listening to someone who took the time to confide in you. Of course not all men do it, but this isn't supposed to be about you; you're not the one in that particular conversation who laid out their problems in hopes someone gives a damn.