OBLIC'S PROFILE

Oblic
Once a member of RMN, always a member of RMN!
1937
*peeks in* Wow, this place has grown!

Search

Filter

Overacheiving to the MAX! 4 parties of 99

author=kentona
I am pretty sure you are the only one.

To help put this into perspective, when I designed the game, I anticipated that the typical endgame party would be around level 42, with a variance roughly between 39-47 depending on how quickly you played through the game. I beat the game in my testing around level 36~39, but I knew all the ins-and-outs (naturally). I think I leveled up some testing parties up to level 41 (which, iirc, is the last level any of the classes get new skills), but never much beyond that!

When I heard about another player having characters in the level 60s I thought they were insane. When I heard about parties in the 90s, I KNEW they were insane. When I watch and read this... it transcends insane?

Congratulations on obsessing with this game more than I! Didn't think that would ever happen!


Thanks! It wouldn't have been possible if you didn't make such a great game!

author=Clareain_Christopher
Huh, that was pretty awesome. Grats!


Thanks! I'm glad you enjoyed!

author=jackalotrun
U mad bro?
No, seriously, I've done some pretty obsessive things (spent 2 months playing LOZ Ocarina Of Time 3D Non-Stop(No seriously)) but seriously WTF


Mad? I suppose in the sense that I'm nuts. But, like you seem to agree, we all have our gaming weaknesses.

Meteor.PNG

Holy shit snacks! That is one badass meteor!

Beautiful things

I know that everything I have posted on the forums so far has been controversial, but I'd like to get away from that.

I have thinking a lot lately about some philosophical stuff and have been examining things in my life very closely, trying to understand how I got to where I am. One of the basic things I realized was simply that we get to where we are through experiences (obvious, right?). Yet, for the most part, the little things don't cause great change or alter the course too greatly. So then I started looking more closely at the bigger experiences, the ones that DO alter the "course" or "path" we were on before we had that experience. I narrowed it down to two categories: terrible things and beautiful things.

Being a pessimist, I looked at the terrible things first, trying to figure out how these things affect us, and more specifically myself. I came to the conclusion that, for the most part, terrible things don't really change the course so much as they make us avoidant of certain situations. Yes, they can make you do something you normally wouldn't otherwise, but I am more interested in actual decision making to DO something.

I then realized that the good or beautiful things are really what change us and open doors to new things. Seeing the sunrise, a rainbow, or a butterfly; holding a newborn; something along those lines. I think these are truly the things that make us into who we are.

TLDR

What is the most beautiful thing that you experienced that truly changed who you are or how your life has turned out, and how/why did it change you?

[Poll] Why aren't you making a puzzle for BQ: TNG?

I would have tried.... but I am more of the gamer than the game maker. I haven't done any kind of legitimate programming in YEARS.

...I would like to try someday though...

So_much_stuff.png

Wow... I don't even think I have this much pirated music! Kidding, kidding... or am I?

So how can the files that go into a game be greater than its actual size...? Probably a dumb question, but I have to ask.

Time for something new. Augments!

This idea is... different. I can't say whether or not I like it because I haven't played this in a while (so much for the BS contest I started!). But I like the idea of commitment, at least on some level. So I guess I would go with "C" as well. Even if you can swap them if you are super patient and run all the way back to the world map, I don't think most people would do it.

BTW (and I'm not complaining), but how many more updates do you have planned for this badboy lol!

The gay marriage debate...

Hmmm... I feel like we're really getting off track here. I know I said some... not so well supported statements about polygamy and human-animal relationships, but I only tried to use those as examples of how I felt about freedom. I guess some people took those comments a bit more seriously than meant them to be taken.

Anyway, I'm still interested in what people think about the whole "changing the name of marriage for legal reasons" thing. Any new thoughts?

waterfallbattle.jpg

I've been wondering... is that the dog from "Secret of Evermore" or am I nuts?

The gay marriage debate...

Okay, for starters, the goat thing was an extreme example of how I feel about freedoms. My point was, as long as no one is being TRULY hurt by your actions anything should be okay (being offended as a "bigot" or otherwise soft skinned individual doesn't count; grow up and walk away from the things that bug you; don't piss in others' cheerios just because something is "icky" to you).

author=emmych
If we're changing it to civil unions, make the straight people have civil unions as well.


So much this! I completely agree here. LockeZ said something about doing this would cause an assload of paperwork because laws would have to be redefined... so what?! I would much rather have a "civil union" with a woman than to be "married" to her. Again, as long as both received the same benefits or what have you. Let me be more clear about this...

I recently went to a friends wedding - a very religious friend - to whom I very close. Although we have butt heads, although lightly, on the religion issue, I still wanted to go and support him and his new wife. But, not having been to a wedding in quite a few years, I was... I guess appalled is a bit harsh, but it's the word that comes to mind. I was appalled to hear the priest, or whatever he's called, say the things about the "woman in this holiest of unions". It was worse than demeaning. It made her sound like she was to be his slave! I know most of it was just tradition and what not, but it was still rather fucked up.

So... I don't want to be a part of that. Marriage to me is a bit of an archaic tradition that was more geared toward building bonds and stopping wars than it was about love and companionship. Yes, things have changed over time, but some of those traditions are still there. When (and more importantly IF) I get "married", I want it to be on equal terms with my wife/spouse/significant other rather than be the "dominant figure". To me, the act of "marrying" someone is a way of entering a partnership, not a way of owning the other person or vise versa.

I hate to keep repeating this point, but I think marriage should stay in the churches. If a church will honor a gay couple, awesome. That would really help me respect at least that specific church much more. But since most of them are too snotty and dickish to let the gay community into there "club", let's change the legal bit so we don't have to get the crazies riled up.

Also, Emmych, thank you for throwing in your two cents. Like you said, we, as heterosexuals, can never understand how this truly affects the people involved. I both respect and appreciate you voicing your opinion here. Thank you!