SHADOWTEXT'S PROFILE

Search

Filter

Free Graphics Resources for Cheap Digital Artists :P

I'd just like to add TileStudio, for cheap digital artists working on 2D game resources like tiles and sprites. Sovan turned me onto this one and it's just the best I've used.

http://tilestudio.sourceforge.net/

Forum D&D Game (UPDATED: Finalized Details) JOIN NOW!

Yes, as far as I know tomorrow....er....tonight, I guess....should be on still. Has everyone got Ventrilo working?

Naming your characters

I tend to feel that the best names are the ones believable as existing in the real world, or esoteric names that really do exist in the real world....Ezra's a pretty good one. There are real people named Ezra, some of whom are even historically significant, and it doesn't come off like a contrived, tortured fantasy-style name that I see too many people do. I blame Tolkien.

Even using fairly normal human names is fine, but too mundane can break a player's suspension of disbelief.

I'm kind of fond of androgynous names, and giving people names that are usually wrong for their gender. It's not something I'd suggest as "advice" for other people to use when coming up with names, just a personal observation for the names I find most amusing to give characters lately. So it's purely an element of my personal style.

I agree that names are important, but there's no hard and fast rule about finding good ones I think. I think one of the most important points is imagining having a conversation with someone with that name, and whether you would be able to take them seriously....and how you would choose to shorten it if you became casual with them, if it's not already fairly short. It's an important aspect of the social dynamic that gets overlooked a lot--generally the only characters you see using pet names are the overly energetic, goofy characters, but in real life they tend to be common to whole social circles, at least.

Rock Band 2

Man, disparage eighties music at your own peril. That's when Van Halen actually got a good singer, Boston released their best album, and a lot of bands like Rush, Styx, Pink Floyd and Journey did their best music.

Tons of great bands started in the 80's, like REM, They Might Be Giants, the Pixies, and a lot of good bands that wouldn't get really famous until later like the Goo Goo Dolls, Gin Blossoms, Live, Green Day and Nirvana. Also, like every Hair Metal band ever. Poison, Night Ranger, Bon Jovi, Guns n' Roses, Metallica, Warrant, and Cinderella are all 80's. Just....yeah, the 80's were awesome. I'm not even counting all the stuff that was just so bad it was good, like Eye of the Tiger and We Built This City.

Truth or Happiness?

author=narcodis link=topic=1618.msg25635#msg25635 date=1217310350
I remember touching on this subject in a philosophy class I took a few years back. It's basically the "red pill / blue pill" question from the Matrix. Do you want to live your life in an ignorant happiness, or seek the truth for yourself?


We were given a question to discuss as a class. Suppose there is a machine, and this machine, when you are hooked up to it, will suspend you in a state of infinite bliss. You never feel unhappy. You never feel without pleasure. You never feel bored. You never feel sad, lonely, angry, or afraid. You are always happy and content when in this machine.
If you were told you could enter this machine, but never come back out, would you do it?

The general consensus was "I would, if I wasn't made aware of exactly what it did."

It seems awareness really is the key. You can be blissfully ignorant your entire life, until you're made aware of how ignorant you are. You dig?
Would this be a Lotus Eater Machine by any chance?

But yeah, pleasure without pain just doesn't work. The only way you can define that as not being boring is to assume the suspension of consciousness and individuality. Essentially, it would mean death, in the sense that the person you used to be no longer exists.

And at that, I don't think that knowing something is an illusion makes you unable to enjoy it. Humans have a very powerful ability to suspend their disbelief; it's a required component of any form of fiction. If we can appreciate movies, books, video games, what have you, we should be able to appreciate a more permenant illusion.

I think this whole discussion can more simply be boiled down to this question:

"In Final Fantasy Tactics Advance, was Marshe the hero, or the villain?"

Truth or Happiness?

Truth doesn't exist. Well maybe it does, but it's unknowable to the human mind probably. Reality is always viewed through the filter of consciousness, and subject to one's own subjective....dealies.

So yeah, happiness. Anyone who thinks they've found truth has just bought in to a more convincing illusion.

Forum D&D Game (UPDATED: Finalized Details) JOIN NOW!

That depends on if you guys are going to be available this weekend.

Forum D&D Game (UPDATED: Finalized Details) JOIN NOW!

Sorry guys, I was kept late at work today and didn't have the prep time I was depending on for tonight. I'm going to have to postpone this week's session.

Wish I could've told you earlier, but my bosses didn't tell me until today, and it's tough to get a message off at the office. And I thought I was going to have enough time even so -_-. Sorry again.

Sonic and the Black Knight

author=Enker link=topic=1558.msg25193#msg25193 date=1216979652
it's a shame, because this would be a really good look for their RPG franchise if it were an elseworlds approach. Making it a cannon entry seems worrying though.
It's not a canon entry. It's part of the same series as Sonic and the Secret Rings, where Sonic's basically in a bunch of storybooks.

So, like you said, Elseworlds.

The Dark Knight

author=harmonic link=topic=1557.msg25155#msg25155 date=1216956685
So, if the movie had fewer action sequences, its deeper themes would be legitimate? Lots of movies (even snobby, artsy movies) attempt to portray the depravity of man, but fail hard in comparison to Dark Knight.

Kentona: yes
I think part of the issue is that it's showing how depraved a man is, not how depraved man is.. It was actually pretty humanistic about the nature of man in general. Look at the scene with the Ferries for proof of that. And even the other baddie in this movie (I can't imagine anyone is going to be surprised by it, but I'll be vague in case someone was living on Pluto while everyone else was learning the Batman mythos) took quite a bit to snap. And before he snapped, he was mostly a pretty okay guy. Even avoided a lot of pitfalls he could've fallen in.

I don't think the Joker being as deeply disturbed as he was necessarily says anything about humans in general, at least nothing that we didn't already know. And maybe part of the reason the Joker's evil in this movie isn't as effective on some of us is that...

...well those of us who follow comics at all know that the Joker has done a lot worse than the stuff he did in this movie. Are you familiar with the backstory of Oracle?

To quote from TV Tropes' write up for Joker's "Rape the Dog" moment:
Although it's hard for this effect to truly apply to The Joker, considering the grotesque and disturbing nature of many of his crimes, many people thought that "The Killing Joke" -- in which The Joker kidnapped and savagely crippled Barbara Gordon, then subjected Commissioner Gordon to a funhouse ride plastered with giant photos of his daughter naked and bleeding -- took things a teensy bit far. Ironic, considering the Joker's backstory introduced in the story was trying to paint him up as sympathetic.