Full Games List
Featured Games
New Games
Media
Images
Blogs
Game Updates
Images Feedback Summary
Game Design Highlights
Tutorials
Articles
Scripts
Utilities / Plugins
Resources
Engines
Engine Bulletins
What is Makerscore?
Past Events
Achievements
Misaos
Forums
Chat
New to RMN?
Full Store List
RMN Music Pack (free)
Profile
Locker
Play ListsMARIO'S PROFILE
mario
0
CloseSearch
Filter
All
Game Pages
User Statuses
The Story Generator
tactical rpgs like fire emblem?
Downloading it now... only 4.6 MB? Pretty small game I expect. Still, looks good and I'm glad you suggested it.
Hope for even more good recommendations
Hope for even more good recommendations
tactical rpgs like fire emblem?
I just checked it out, looks great, I am downloading it now. Thanks for the help. If anyone has anymore recommendations please let me know, thanks.
tactical rpgs like fire emblem?
Are there any games on this site with tactical rpg like features, like advanced wars and fire emblem?
In Praise of Peace Review
Clock of Atonement
Misaos
The system is wrong... youtube and newgrounds uses a simple system like this, anyone at all can vote and judge a game. But those are uploaded games, meant to entertain usually between 15 minutes and an hour, and no installation/ download/ download rgss stuff/download the type of maker/ install them, then play a fan game you just spent 2 hours stressfully installing all that stuff to do, only to find out the game might not be good as advertised, or not be compatable with your pc, or that you forget what part of the site it was on or get too lazy to vote. This conflict will result in poorer than necessary reviews and votes for reasons outside of the creators control.
On youtube many thousands of people vote on videos, but only a handful o those votes are from trolls who, inevitably vote low simply because of their own high perception of themselves. This: "anyone can vote, and every vote is extremely important" thing gives too much power to anyone who wants their own awards without judging who deserves a proper award.
Still, I'll keep an open mind, let's see how it goes. I mean, there's only so many ways this can go, right? Let's see whether or not this is the right one.
On youtube many thousands of people vote on videos, but only a handful o those votes are from trolls who, inevitably vote low simply because of their own high perception of themselves. This: "anyone can vote, and every vote is extremely important" thing gives too much power to anyone who wants their own awards without judging who deserves a proper award.
Still, I'll keep an open mind, let's see how it goes. I mean, there's only so many ways this can go, right? Let's see whether or not this is the right one.
Misaos
post=148020
1) You're seven months late to the party
2) You have it backwards. Games made later in the year ALWAYS have an advantage over games made early in it because people are more likely to remember something they played in November than they did in, say, February. Allowing them to vote all year means they can cast votes for games that impress them as they play them rather than trying to remember what they played in December, giving up, and putting all their votes on the last thing they played. It's a better system.
...in theory. This is the first year we're trying it, so I dunno how well it works.
Also, hey, this is a good time to remind everyone to do some misao voting! Don't forget those games you played in the first half of the year, guys! Remember, you can always change your votes later!
NO! You can vote ALL YEAR. Meaning a necessary release date for that year is no longer in place.
So, let's see if your logic or my logic is correct in this simulation I'm about to run. A good game vs. a phenomenal game that gets released later on that year
guy likes game--->guy votes game of the year (January)
another guy likes the same game (February)
another guy likes the same game (March)
another guy likes the same game (April)
another guy likes the same game (May)
another guy likes the same game (June)
another guy likes the same game (July)
another guy likes the same game (August)
another guy likes the same game (September)
another guy likes the same game (October)
game 2 comes out
guy likes other game2 better (October) and changes his vote
another guy likes the game2 (October)
another guy likes game1 (November)
guy likes game 2 better (November) and changes his vote
another guy likes game1 (November)
game 1 gets 9 votes
game 2 gets 4 votes
but because more people had a chance to play the other game because it was submitted with less time to vote on it, game 2 lost, regardless of being better.
Your logic does apply to the people whom changed their votes, but it would only work if more than half of all people changed their votes to game 2. However setting up conditions for that is going to be hard. You'd have to make someone search for game 2 more often then game 1. Given less time, that would be harder.
If you only get to vote after some sorta completion date field, then every game gets fair consideration and an equal amount of time to vote for each.
Multiple love interests in a serious rpg... Does it work?
post=148010
The Love Plus thing has nothing to do with what I said.
I also cannot think of a single good FF or FE love story, and a game having a love triangle does not mean it is good at what it does.
This is either because you are not thinking or you haven't played enough.
Heard of the infamous Cloud, Tifa, Aries triangle? They've made movies on it.
FE protagonistxdragon girl?
Stop being so pessimistic and rude.
post=148014
There's always Jade Empire.
Isn't that an mmo?
Games - Tester
Games - Other
