[MAFIA] SIMPLE MAFIA FOR NORMAL PEOPLE

Posts

author=psy_wombats
In that case, a reveal would be worth it I'd think. But anyway, still waiting on Gourd before putting anything together I guess.

Wait, like, a power role revealing themself would be worth it? Why?
author=Ebeth
I'm still suspicious of Gourd. He's a fun and playful dude but (especially at the start of the game) was acting goofier than he normally does- as such the dramatic posts- saying that he was "playing sleuth" still strike me as odd.

I think there was one post. I'm sure that really set off alarms for you but idk why drawing attention to myself with dramatization is helpful as scum.

author=Ebeth
If either Is or I wanted to get suspicion off ourselves quickly we could have pinned it on each other -not you.

This is a good point and honestly makes me lean toward ebeth being town. Her strong read for town on isri isn't too surpising either since from the start isri held that ebeth was probably town aligned. I think when someone finds you to be town it's a little harder to find that person scummy.
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
author=Gourd_Clae
After yesterday I don't have much of a read on him still. I can't say he exhibited much scum behavior near the end of the day that I noticed. I compared myself to him because I was responding to your post earlier that also compared the two of us. Sorry for not quoting that in the original post that probably cause a little unneeded confusion.
this:
author=Jeroen_Sol
I could have made this all one post, I guess, but I've noticed Gourd and LockeZ haven't really said much about the people who didn't get focussed on today, or if they have I've missed it.


Right, but what I meant with that post was that I wanted more information from both of you individually, and while you did answer, it also seemed like you were throwing shade at LockeZ, saying he posted less reads than you.

I guess if anything that makes a Gourd/LockeZ scumteam less likely though.
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
author=Ebeth
LockeZ I'm on the fence about- he's hard to get a read on. The vote in Cap seems weird but it wouldn't be the first gambit run by town in this game. Him trying to get info from a possible town tracker also seems weird as that would immediately out that person as scum.


author=Ebeth
I'm strongly against the final PR revealing themselves right now unless they have actual useful info. If tracker did see who visited Cap then we need to know- if not they should stay hidden until they have info or to prevent a mislynch if they are targeted. Jailer won't be useful until we nail one of the scum and should not reveal as well.

Also I'm realizing that this may have been what LockeZ was trying to say and I mis interpreted it in which case- oops.


I don't know what you thought I meant, but what I actually meant was the same thing you said: that if the tracker knows who visited Cap, then please say so. The person who visited Cap was the scum performing a nightkill, since there are no other power roles in that setup. We would know who to lynch.
Jeroen_Sol
Nothing reveals Humanity so well as the games it plays. A game of betrayal, where the most suspicious person is brutally murdered? How savage.
3885
author=Ebeth
I'm strongly against the final PR revealing themselves right now unless they have actual useful info.


Exactly. The PR already knows what setup we're in, so they know whether or not there is a roleblocker. They are also the only person for whom that information is relevant, so there is no reason to tell this to the rest of town and get themselves nightkilled in the process.
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
Oh. Huh. I just realized what was actually happening in that exchange.

I'm not really on board with psy_wombats apparently trying to goad Ebeth into admitting that she has a power role. Like, he even worded it in such a way as to make her feel like she'd already admitted it, even though she hadn't, so that she wouldn't realize what info she was revealing. That is a manipulative and tricksy thing to do.

That's as good a reason to lynch as any, I think.

#lynch psy_wombats
author=Jeroen_Sol
author=Ebeth
I'm strongly against the final PR revealing themselves right now unless they have actual useful info.
Exactly. The PR already knows what setup we're in, so they know whether or not there is a roleblocker. They are also the only person for whom that information is relevant, so there is no reason to tell this to the rest of town and get themselves nightkilled in the process.

I feel the same but I guess psy doesn't...?

Also, I guess I was throwing shade at lockeZ inadvertently, but I was trying to point out that you were putting the two of us in this same group that I didn't seem to fit into well.
@Gourd: Revealing tracker would only be useful if they caught the person visiting Cap, like Ebeth stated. Then we'd have one scum down, even if it took the tracker's life to do it, that's what I mean by worth it. Otherwise the tracker runs the risk of getting killed tonight without nailing their scum.

@LockeZ: I'm 100% confident that Ebeth does not have a PR. Otherwise she would've claimed it yesterday instead of offering to suicide. If she had tried (or offered any explanation aside from "that's not what I meant") I was ready with the lynch button.
Being the second day phase, I'd say it is pretty slim that the tracker got any information since there were a few good picks. Without a lucky pick the best they could do is prove that one person is town, but I would push it an extra day if that's all that they got.

Same deal with the roleblocker which is why it's unlikely that we have a jailkeeper. If we do they will probably die during the next night phase. I think this scenario is extremely unlikely though.

I still don't have any definite vibes yet. I would like to hear from IF again before I make up my mind. I dislike all the tracker hunting though in that I think if we do have one, they'd be smart enough on their own to know when to come forward.
Just did the math actually, and it may be better to claim. Right now we have have 5 town, and 2 scum. If we mis-lynch tonight then that leave 3 town and 2 scum which would be a loss. Better to know who the tracker is, and whoever the town member is in order to drop our odds of a mis-lynch.

I haven't played that many mafias though, so can someone confirm if this post is correct?
@demon Yeah either PR should know when to call which is why I think it's a bad sign when someone brings it up unprompted -- easier for scum to talk about powers and setup than who they think is scum.

Anyway, nothing from Gourd really changes my opinion. Teamwise I think Gourd/LockeZ is unlikely and IF/Ebeth is unlikely. I don't think demon can be scum unless Jero is also scum and that team seems /really/ unlikely, so willing to rule him out. That leaves Jero (town at this point), Gourd (no real read), and IF (too few posts). I'm feeling better for Gourd and IF as town because they're Ebeth's two scumreads -- both seem very neutral to me and Ebeth seems scummy to me. Also it's feeling more likely that the scum run on Gourd wasn't all town, in which case I'm willing to remove Jero and call one of <Gourd, Ebeth> as scum.

My current thoughts are LockeZ/Ebeth scumteam for some individual reasons (everything about Ebeth yesterday is valid, LockeZ's cap hunt is still awful) and they're the only viable pair where I could spot team play. I think LockeZ tries to help Ebeth yesterday in three spots: trying to start a train on Cap, voting against Isrieri, and finally that "analysis" post that Ebeth is engaging while Isrieri is not. Also, weaker, but today Ebeth clarifies for LockeZ, identifies LockeZ as her only "I don't have a read." I had originally thought Ebeth was less likely to be scum after the close call yesterday but I missed that LockeZ's Cap vote was likely the "subtle" defense he tried before going for a more overt defense as the situation got more dire. Plus both are the only two to unprompted bring up setup, when this is the one thing scum already knows. It reads in both cases like playing dumb.

Summary:
Townish: demon, Jeroen
??: IF, Gourd
Scummish: LockeZ, Ebeth

#lynch LockeZ to make it even but I could do either.

@LockeZ: Were you trying to bait scum with this post or did you think at this point Cap was scum? https://rpgmaker.net/forums/topics/23154/?post=826011#post826011 -- This is the primary reason why I don't think your late vote on Cap was just to see who would get on board. This comes /after/ Isrieri very explicitly points out Cap is likely PR.
Ninja'd -- @demon: The last PR should claim today if they're about to be lynched but not otherwise.
Alright, got it. I wasn't sure if a mis-lynch this day phase would cause us to lose or not after doing the math. Also on the subject of ebeth/lockez scumteam, they also both called me out on being inactive, but I personally don't think I have inactive. Small observation I just made, and I personally think I've been decently active.
After rereading my post, that may have come off as slightly confusing. To phrase it better, it could have been a team effort to subtly attack my credibility in order to get me killed down the line. Those were the only two to say that about my activity.
CAVE_DOG_IS_BACK
On sunny days, I go out walking
1142
Current Votecount

Psy_Wombats - 1: Lockez
Lockez - 1: Psy Wombats

Not Voting: InfectionFiles, Gourd, Jeroen, demonlord, Ebeth

With seven alive, it takes four votes to execute.





author=psy_wombats
@Gourd: Revealing tracker would only be useful if they caught the person visiting Cap, like Ebeth stated. Then we'd have one scum down, even if it took the tracker's life to do it, that's what I mean by worth it. Otherwise the tracker runs the risk of getting killed tonight without nailing their scum.

Ah, alright, that makes sense. I thought it was a bit weird for you to say it was worth it, but didn't want to jump the gun.
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
author=psy_wombats
@LockeZ: Were you trying to bait scum with this post or did you think at this point Cap was scum? https://rpgmaker.net/forums/topics/23154/?post=826011#post826011 -- This is the primary reason why I don't think your late vote on Cap was just to see who would get on board. This comes /after/ Isrieri very explicitly points out Cap is likely PR.
I thought Cap was screwing with us. You were acting like he was suddenly ultra-trustworthy, and that sat the wrong way with me because he hadn't actually revealed anything. I mean, I still think my argument there made sense at the time.

You're trying to misrepresent what I said to make me sound suspicious now and I don't appreciate it. I never implied that my vote on Cap was "just" to see who would get on board; I specifically said that it was "also" for that reason. Arguing against a strawman stance that I didn't actually take is another scum tactic. Try again.
Post in question is here: https://rpgmaker.net/forums/topics/23154/?post=826243#post826243. You use "also" but my read was that you didn't want that lynch on Cap to actually succeed. Is that correct or not?
LockeZ
I'd really like to get rid of LockeZ. His play style is way too unpredictable. He's always like this too. If he ran a country, he'd just kill and imprison people at random until crime stopped.
5958
I wanted it to succeed if he was scum.
That's not really answer. Was that vote in earnest or part of a play?