SNOWOWL'S PROFILE
Search
Filter
What are you thinking about right now?
author=Dyhaltoauthor=SnowOwlMurica has the most sophisticated democracy in our time. It's the Westminster system that's backwards.
Well, there's always actual democracy (which Murrica isn't).
Let me ask you this: Do you think the people that make up the majority of a democracy, the middle and lower class, has any real power in Murrica?
The westminster system also has problems, I agree, and it can probably be argued that actual democracies where the majority rules are literally nonexistant, but saying that America especially is a democracy is laughable.
What are you thinking about right now?
Describe the above poster's avatar in a 5-word sentence.
What are you thinking about right now?
What are you thinking about right now?
You guys clearly don't like each other. Don't get me wrong here, I'm not trying to defend the game, I don't give a crap about the game or anything about it, I'm just curious to why you go out of your way to play something you already know you won't like? Stalking is obviously not what you're doing, but the only reason I can really see that you would both buy and play it is that you want to leave a negative review and make the developer mad.
Describe the above poster's avatar in a 5-word sentence.
[RMVX ACE] Is giving a game Atari 2600 style graphics a good idea?
Short answer: No.
Longer answer: If you have a good reason. Being too lazy to do something better is not a good reason. I think below NES graphics is too low-tech for most people to stomach, maybe even SNES.
I'm probably alot more accepting than the average person and even I would be really reluctant to play something with Atari-type graphics. I can appreciate someone that does something really good looking within certain limitations, like this picture:
But the way you worded your question makes me think that's not what you're aiming for. You're basically just doing it to make it faster to make, correct? It will have to be a damn good game in other departments for people to play it anyway.
Longer answer: If you have a good reason. Being too lazy to do something better is not a good reason. I think below NES graphics is too low-tech for most people to stomach, maybe even SNES.
I'm probably alot more accepting than the average person and even I would be really reluctant to play something with Atari-type graphics. I can appreciate someone that does something really good looking within certain limitations, like this picture:
But the way you worded your question makes me think that's not what you're aiming for. You're basically just doing it to make it faster to make, correct? It will have to be a damn good game in other departments for people to play it anyway.
What are you thinking about right now?
What are you thinking about right now?
I think it was a good thing she leaked those documents, but I can see why the army would be unhelpful to her. I mean what she's doing is basically first kicking them in the balls and then asking for favours by acting like a child and going on a hunger strike. Anyone would be kinda reluctant, if not averse, to helping at that point.
What are you thinking about right now?
author=Corfaisusauthor=SnowOwlIt's not to be taken literally.
Anyone seen any signs in the sun, the moon and the stars? No? I guess we are safe this time too, then. Phew.
Like everything concerning religion, I guess. Well if they are not to be taken literally, those three verses could fit pretty much any time during which Jerusalem existed, which is roughly 6000 years. Must be a work in progress, the end of the world.
Those prophecy thingies are always so vague you could put them at any number of dates. How am I supposed to know when to convert to the correct religion before the world ends like this? Be more specific, damn amateur prophets.














