APRILSCHILD'S PROFILE
Search
Filter
Muse [v0.8 Demo]
I dunno, I think your maps look purty. (I like liteing FX, so sue me.) I may in fact play this - I like the genre.
[Full] Backstage & [Demo] Backstage II THE DAY OF ROCKENING/THE ARROCKALYPSE IS AT HAND
No seriously, guys, this question is not rhetorical and I'm going to ask it while I still can:
Everyone seemed so excited for this! Why is no one playing it?
Please, I'm so curious... what is up?
I continue to endorse this demo because it's honestly my favorite thing that Max has made so far. I'm sad that it's so under the radar. : (
Everyone seemed so excited for this! Why is no one playing it?
Please, I'm so curious... what is up?
I continue to endorse this demo because it's honestly my favorite thing that Max has made so far. I'm sad that it's so under the radar. : (
RMN3 Changes (EVERYONE READ)
author=WIP link=topic=2801.msg53434#msg53434 date=1230847423
Not only that, here is a scenario: if you have a completed game and it has been completed for two months, how are people supposed to find it in a forum? You have to dig through pages and pages of old forum threads.
Because it isn't adding content to a thread that bumps it, it's continued discussion about it that does.
You're removing that mechanic - therefore, old games will be more easily lost.
I think the main difference between your opinion of valid bumping and mine is pretty substantial - you think bumping should happen only when the CREATOR has something new to say. The forums make bumping happen whenever ANYONE has something to say about the subject.
When people see a creator add content, it doesn't tell them how good the content is. But when people see a forum with lots and lots of replies, aka a thread that keeps being bumped by OTHER users, they have more faith in the project.
Also, the difference between people seeing a list of game pages and a list of forum threads? It's all very mental/psychological. Your readers are used to looking at a forum when they want to discuss (bringing us back to the original purpose of a "forum," like in ancient times), and looking at a game page when they want to play.
Since a forum is engraved into all our minds as a "place of discussion," people are more likely to click on a thread and read about it, read the discussion about it, even if they don't initially intend to play the game. However, I fear that less people will click on a game page because of the mentality, "why would I play this? It doesn't sound interesting to me." No one equates a game page with discussion as much as one equates a forum is discussion - and for good reason!
Trying to ram a new paradigm down your consumers' throats is never a good idea, no matter how well intentioned. I know this from recent experience - you'll get more stubbornness in return than you ever thought possible. More than likely, people will continue in the way they've always continued, because humans are like that. When they like something, they don't easily change. So most likely your forumgoers will continue going on the forum and ignoring the game pages - as they have done. And if they see a game page they know nothing about, they will be more inclined to ignore it than a forum thread, which seems less threatening and more noncommittal.
RMN3 Changes (EVERYONE READ)
Instead of having to dig through random forum topics that you incessantly bump, they can just go to your game page to do so.
I just have one major concern about this change:
Advertising.
Yes, I know, active content will "float to the top" of the page." But, what about completed games? What about games that take months between people posting changes (let's face it, despite hard effort made on games, no one makes substantial changes within a day!)? Will people's most prized projects wither and die because they are complete? I feel this is counter-intuitive and actively discourages people from completing their games, or posting their completed games on the site.
Also, I don't know how the list will be, but giving us a bunch of titles in a row is not the same as advertising. More than likely, people will read a title and say "this isn't for me" automatically, ignoring what could have been a perfectly good game because more info is not given to them (and yes, they could just click on the game page, but if they don't know more about the project, they're likely not to do that).
By taking away gamemakers' means of advertising, you're taking away a HUGE part of the creative process. There is nothing, nothing more important to creating art than selling it.
New Years is approaching!
I won't be getting a kiss/laid for New Year because I'm currently in another state than the ol' boyf. You guys who have your s.o.'s near should feel very blessed!
However, one of my closest and oldest friends has returned from Japan (where she's teaching) for the holiday! I am making many many drinks and we will be playing drunken Wii together.
(On a side note, that girl has access to the most awesome games and gaming equipment. Too bad she can hardly read them :P)
However, one of my closest and oldest friends has returned from Japan (where she's teaching) for the holiday! I am making many many drinks and we will be playing drunken Wii together.
(On a side note, that girl has access to the most awesome games and gaming equipment. Too bad she can hardly read them :P)
Cyberbullying and the Law
author=Tyranos link=topic=2798.msg53234#msg53234 date=1230769534
I am just saying that because you are taking the girls side your judgement is altered to favor harsher punishment of the grown woman.
I'm totally not saying that what this woman did was illegal, or even should have been. As I said before, (and we agree on this), that what should be illegal is posting people's info online without their consent, which could endanger others "for teh lulz."
I also agree that what she did was not sane or rational, and this is coming from someone who is a fairly insecure girl with depression.
But I do hold adults to a higher accountability than I do teens/preteens. And what this woman did was inexcusable, because not only did she act like a teenager herself, but she did this knowing that this young girl suffered from depression already. I am, and always have been, an ageist. I believe that children, and even some teens, do irrational and retarded and stupid things. But I also expect my age demographic and older to behave in a more rational and, well, adult manner.
No, what this woman did was NOT murder, not even a little. That, I could even understand more. There are PLENTY of adult murderers, plenty of adults that murder children.
But for a grown woman to stoop to the kind of stuff her teenage children would do, that to me is mindboggling.
Cyberbullying and the Law
author=Tyranos link=topic=2798.msg53226#msg53226 date=1230768395
Being depressed does not give you any special treatment. If you are at the age of 13 you should know DAMN WELL that anything that happens online is pretty much moot and stupid. Why would a 13 year old even look for a relationship online? That's stupid and depression would not lead to such behavior.
If she honestly thought this person who she met only online was in a relationship with her only at the age of 13 then she wasn't just depressed. She was stupid.
Wow, this is incredibly offensive. I was a 14-year-old once, and yeah, I did have an online relationship. I really liked the guy. I like him as a friend even now. He was a real human being and our conversations were real.
Non-romantically, one of my very best friends, I met online. We didn't meet for eight years... I only just met him IRL this past year. Our friendship was just as real as any friendships I have in life, especially now that many of my friends have moved away and I can only talk to them online.
If someone feels ugly, sad, unpopular, and unloved, yeah, they're going to be thrilled when someone on myspace says "you're really beautiful," "i love your eyes" (actual quotes). Especially in a world that's getting smaller and smaller because of the internet. Maybe it's different for boys (I doubt it), but when you're an insecure teenaged girl, you can get won over pretty easily when someone says that they think you're great.
It wasn't like she did the stupid 13-year-old thing and went to have sex/got abducted. Instead, she was just told by someone she trusted that they suddenly and inexplicably hated her. IRL or OL, hearing that kind of thing sucks. Like Max said, she was definitely already not in a healthy state of mind to have killed herself over that...
But the fact remains that an ADULT feigned a romantic relationship WITH A CHILD... just to fuck with them.
Hey guys, wanna help out? Let's talk.
author=Rei- link=topic=2292.msg53224#msg53224 date=1230768216
Max: You're making the change WIP is talking about pretty obvious.
It's a good choice and turns the site activity in the better direction.
Wait... how will not talking about people's games... make the site more about games?
??? ??? ??? ???
Cyberbullying and the Law
author=Tyranos link=topic=2798.msg53219#msg53219 date=1230767970author=Feldschlacht IV link=topic=2798.msg53216#msg53216 date=1230767839No one forces you to read something. It's not like the people sending her mean messages were physically holding her eyes open and forcing her face at the computer screen.
Tell that to little kids being bullied on the playground.
Sure. As soon as they tell me how someone sitting at a computer miles away PHYSICALLY forced a little girl to look at her computer screen as being anything similar to their own disposition.
I don't know dude, it would be like if you were dating a girl IRL for a really long time (which no one forced you to do), and then one day she kicked you in the nuts and told you she was sleeping with your best friend and hated everything you stood for and told you to kill yourself. Maybe this wouldn't phase you, yeah, but what if you'd told her all your deepest secrets/fears and she used all those against you to hurt you.
And let's pretend for a second you're 13 and clinically depressed.
That is what happened to this girl. That is all she knows happened to her. She died before she found out that "lol someone was faking it the whole time."
Cyberbullying and the Law
author=Tyranos link=topic=2798.msg53214#msg53214 date=1230767742author=aprilschild link=topic=2798.msg53207#msg53207 date=1230767363author=Tyranos link=topic=2798.msg53193#msg53193 date=1230765703
This is like saying if someone is mean to you and you kill yourself your family has the right to press murder charges. Simply because you were not nice to them. I'm sorry but this country does not force people to be nice. Live with it. No one has to kiss your, or my own, ass and be a suck up who doesn't stop throwing compliments.
I'd agree except for the fact that this wasn't just someone saying "u suck lol."
It was a long-standing relationship, like a bf/gf relationship, between a teenaged girl and A GROWN WOMAN pretending to be a TEENAGED BOY.
Now think about if I'd replaced "woman" with "man."
Yeah, that's what I thought.
But instead of this ADULT feigning a romantic relationship with a young girl to get sex, she did it to ruin her life and get revenge.
It may not be illegal, but that kind of behavior is SERIOUSLY f*cked up.
Okay I replaced...no real effect other than that person is a loser for pretending to be a teenager. I've heard of a midlife crisis but wow. Thats recapturing your youth.
Uh, it's definitely actually for real a crime for an adult to have a relationship with a 13-year-old. If it had been a male, there definitely would have been sexual harrassment/statutory rape charges made.













